darthcoolness3
Sidekick
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2012
- Messages
- 1,272
- Reaction score
- 81
- Points
- 73
When?
last year, when they announced the shows for Disney Plus
When?
last year, when they announced the shows for Disney Plus
Could we get a link/exact wording on that to confirm?last year, when they announced the shows for Disney Plus
Do you have the exact quote or a link to it?last year, when they announced the shows for Disney Plus
That's...not an exact link or quote to your claim.
It’s hard to post a link to someone’s imagination.Do you have the exact quote or a link to it?
That's because it was produced by Marvel Television. They couldn't legally use the Marvel Studios link. But that's always been the case (not just since Disney Plus). It would also be true for Agent Carter. The claim that it's not canon is hard to square with Jarvis's appearance in Endgame.well, Agents of Shield uses an different Marvel Logo than the entire Marvel Cinematic Universe
Agents of SHIELD was ignored by the movies, but the inconsistencies aren't really much more inconsistent that Spider-Man Homecoming screwing up the timeline of when movies took place.I mean, do we actually need more evidence other than the various ways AoS was indifferent or outright contradictory to movie canon? Sure, it'd be nice to get official confirmation, but its not like you could fit AoS into the broader MCU without a sledgehammer and a willingness to smash off 20% of the edges, anyway.
Agents of SHIELD was ignored by the movies, but the inconsistencies aren't really much more inconsistent that Spider-Man Homecoming screwing up the timeline of when movies took place.
There was an article recently that showed Marvel Studios still cared about what Agents of SHIELD did as recently as the finale to ensure consistency. Apparently, the show wanted to call themselves SWORD and were told no. If the show wasn't considered to be part of the same universe, would Marvel Studios care what they did? After all, they could easily just ignore it, right?
does anybody know, when it wasn’t canon any more?
They had Samuel Jackson, Cobie Smulder and Jamie Alexander in a few episodes.
Also they were referring to the events of Thor TDW, Captain America TWS and Avengers AoU
does anybody know, when it wasn’t canon any more?
Season 3 still had president Ellis and Gideon Malick (although the latter was such a small and unnamed part in Avengers that I'm not sure you'd want to count it).Its hard to tell because they mention some actual events like Civil War here and then. The VIP MCU guest stars stoped after season 2 IIRC. And even in season 2 the whole Inhumans-Storyline feel non-canon, since over the whole world Inhumans awaking but we never see one or even mentioned on the big screen.
So for me only season 1 would be canon at best. Though the resuscitation of Coulson with Alien blood sounds even more legit after Captain Marvel, all guest star appereances are kind of forgettable and only easter eggs.
does anybody know, when it wasn’t canon any more?
They had Samuel Jackson, Cobie Smulder and Jamie Alexander in a few episodes.
Also they were referring to the events of Thor TDW, Captain America TWS and Avengers AoU
That's honestly the best way to look at it at this point.I think the best way to look at AOS is that it occurs in another reality in which Coulson is resurrected after the Avengers and SHIELD continues on as a going concern after the events of CA:TWS.
That's always been my take as well. I do think it's important to distinguish between canon and retcons. My belief based on all the comments everyone in an official position has made is that the Marvel Television stuff is canon, but the movies, of course, are free to retcon anything that's inconvenient for them and ignore anything they don't care about. Unlike Marvel Studios properties, there's no pressure to include them.I think what is going to happen with Marvel Television content, is what I suspected all along, Feige is going to pick and choose what he wants to use. He even said as much recently when asked about Charlie Cox in SM3, he said everything is on the table. He doesn't have hard and fast rules about what is and is not canon and in the case of AoS, there are some characters with good fan followings and interesting content that I think he may choose to continue.
That relationship has and always will have been one way. Same for the Netflix shows. Because the films never had or needed to acknowledge the events of the shows.