Superhobo
Superhero
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2004
- Messages
- 6,254
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Altruism is a sympathetic response. It's not the same thing; that's what I keep trying to say.
Yes, it is. I think we're going in circles, here. But, I wasn't referring to what you've construed as altruism. Like it said in the article I posted -
“To be truly moral, one has to be able to be bad, too,” Dr. Howell said, adding that animals have been observed planning deceptions.
This is referring both to dog-play, where there is a somewhat-cleary defined 'right' and a 'wrong' way to do things, and to other things (which I'm drawing a brain fart on, right now - but, it's in the article itself). To further elaborate -
“Play is very important and animals need to be very sure that they get their requisite amount of play.” Although the amount of play may only be about 2% of the total activity of the animal, that small amount is crucial. In order to get the play they need to be able to engage others and they need to be able to play fairly. “Animals need to hunt and cooperate. They have to be able to interact closely. If they don’t play fairly they can be eliminated from the group.” Animals who are eliminated from a group, he continued, face very little chance for survival.
Though, this still seems somewhat out of context. Again, check out the article itself, if you've got the time.
Different on a much, much deeper level than that.
Ahuh.