You know you can hit the quote button right?
^ Which comics iteration of the characters was 'more successful' doesn't matter. All that matters is the creative intent of the individuals producing this film.
Isn't the inspiration for the film the crux of the arguments here though?
Longtime FF fans are interested in seeing the 616 version of the FF, especially those first 100 or so issues from Jack Kirby. The Tim Story movies gave us a lackluster version of that, with the exception of the changes to Doom, which was inspired in part by UFF. People were dissatisfied but I think more with the execution than with inspirations.
So now this movie comes along and says -- 'those movies didn't work, therefore it must be the source material, let's use UFF as the inspiration'.
While there is also a shift in tone introduced, some of the things from UFF just don't ring true with longtime fans expectations. So already dissatisfied fans become even more disgruntled.
Let's add in the little hints about the film that the studio has sprinkled out over the last 8-10 months. Not enough to satisfy those really interested in the film, and the few things released have also underwhelmed to the point of disdain.
This is where we stand now.
I plan on seeing this movie in the theater. Just because there are things I don't like from all that I've seen, I am still interested in a Fantastic Four movie that I can say captures the essence of the characters I've enjoyed since I was a kid. Maybe this will surprise me.