Monster Goku?

[Trickyg]

http://www.thebadandugly.com/2008/11/06/monster-goku-or-dragonball-weirdness/

Please somebody tell me what the hell this is.

He looks like Selma Hayek in vampire form in Dusk till Dawn.

 

[A.J.Rimmer(BSC)]

Its Oozara Goku.

Hopefully they'll add a shedload of fur on post-production.

 

[Trickyg]

Why?

I could seriously cry now.

Any fan of this series should be offended.

I see wasted money.

 

[Antrax255]

Its called not finished.

 

[huzzah]

I thought Fox stated this was a "test" shot and wont appear in the movie? Anyway the 'amphibian' pic has been out for months.

 

[Water Wagon]

Yeah thats a un used test

 

[Star]

Man, seeing as it's Fox, I'm fairly sure this is practically finished. Fox is the king of half-assed and shoddily done adaptations

 

[LastSunrise1981]

Wait, was this what they were considering using? Seriously that's really pathetic. In fact Goku doesn't have a tail in this one so why would they explore the concept of him turning into a monster?



I can understand them possibly not wanting to go into the concept of Saiyans turning into giant apes at night. But the least they could've done was done more research and actually create the product like they gave a damn.

But then again, this is Fox so expecting quality product is unrealistic.

 

[LastSunrise1981]

I thought Fox stated this was a "test" shot and wont appear in the movie? Anyway the 'amphibian' pic has been out for months.

Fox and company also said Cyclops wouldn't die, Rogue kicks a lot of ass in X3, and Iceman will use the ice slide in X3 too. What's your point?

 

[Da-Scribe]

I wish people would get off the "screw Fox" bandwagon. They're like any other studio. They put out quality productions and terrible productions. I can understand knocking them for the sub-par comic flicks, but to say they suck period? A little drastic as they've put out some serious hitters.

 

[Orb]

Why would the Toy people who are selling the movie toys describe Oozaru as the Giant Monkey?

 

[Ratcrawler]

From what I understand, Goku will go Oozaru during an eclipse, rather than a full moon. Which makes a lot more sense, IMO.

 

[AJOAndre]

Let's beat this dead horse a little more shall we?

 

[Nathan]

From what I understand, Goku will go Oozaru during an eclipse, rather than a full moon. Which makes a lot more sense, IMO.

How does that make more sense?

 

[DorkyFresh]

i honestly think that's one of the few changes that actually makes sense....that is if we're going by OUR Moon. we have 12 full moons a year so Goku would have undoubtedly seen a full moon by the time he were a teen. an eclipse is a lot more rare.....and it's also more visually interesting.

 

[SsM]

i honestly think that's one of the few changes that actually makes sense....that is if we're going by OUR Moon. we have 12 full moons a year so Goku would have undoubtedly seen a full moon by the time he were a teen. an eclipse is a lot more rare.....and it's also more visually interesting.

Yeah. This explanation actually does make sense.

 

[Ratcrawler]

Exactly. Plus they can make up some technical BS about magnetic fields and stuff. Of course NOW naysayers will insist this was a plot device stolen from Heroes.

 

[BestGirl]

i honestly think that's one of the few changes that actually makes sense....that is if we're going by OUR Moon. we have 12 full moons a year so Goku would have undoubtedly seen a full moon by the time he were a teen. an eclipse is a lot more rare.....and it's also more visually interesting.

He could be like the mutants from X-men and his change would be first experienced during his teen years.

 

[DorkyFresh]

Exactly. Plus they can make up some technical BS about magnetic fields and stuff. Of course NOW naysayers will insist this was a plot device stolen from Heroes.

i've heard references, but i've never seen anyone accuse them of ripping off of Heroes.

He could be like the mutants from X-men and his change would be first experienced during his teen years.

that could work i guess...but an eclipse is still more visually appealing, hehe.

 

[Da-Scribe]

Good point Dorky, I didn't think of it like that.

 

[LastSunrise1981]

I wish people would get off the "screw Fox" bandwagon. They're like any other studio. They put out quality productions and terrible productions. I can understand knocking them for the sub-par comic flicks, but to say they suck period? A little drastic as they've put out some serious hitters.

Oh please, there is no bandwagon. Fox studios in general sucks and anyone who says otherwise needs to open their eyes. As for some serious hitters? Their last big hit was a film about a dog. They deserve all the hate for the crimes they've comitted against comic films that had potential to be great, video game films that had potential to be good, and etc.

There is no "hate bandwagon".

 

[Alchemyst]

I wish people would get off the "screw Fox" bandwagon. They're like any other studio. They put out quality productions and terrible productions. I can understand knocking them for the sub-par comic flicks, but to say they suck period? A little drastic as they've put out some serious hitters.

Fox has always been lackluster in their filmaking. When I see the 20th Century Fox logo, I'm immediately put in a bad mood because I dont know what to expect.

 

[Da-Scribe]

Oh please, there is no bandwagon. Fox studios in general sucks and anyone who says otherwise needs to open their eyes. As for some serious hitters? Their last big hit was a film about a dog. They deserve all the hate for the crimes they've comitted against comic films that had potential to be great, video game films that had potential to be good, and etc.

There is no "hate bandwagon".

You mean Marley and Me? A film that just recently hit theaters? You talk about it as if it's less of a film because it's about a dog.

They've also released The Fountain, Borat, Little Miss Sunshine, Walk the Line, The Darjeeling Limited, Juno, The Namesake, Rocky Balboa, and 28 Days Later just to name a few within the past couple of years. The list can go on with past and present classics.

I'm not saying they're awesome, or God's gift to filmmaking. They've also made some of the worst films knowns to man, although we all know those by heart I'm sure. That doesn't mean they're the worst studio out right now. They're the same as any other.

 

[TLH]

Oh my God, that's Oozaru?

 

[Da-Scribe]

I think it'd look fine if it had fur. And maybe not wearing the top of the gi.