Schlosser85
Civilian
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2007
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 30,209
- Points
- 0
Twilight movies can be made for pretty cheap, though, when they're not CGIing werewolves and doing large scale battles.
Their CGI wolves looked pretty damn cheap too.
Twilight movies can be made for pretty cheap, though, when they're not CGIing werewolves and doing large scale battles.
I'd rather see sequels to The Last Vampire on Earth.
My brother just saw this scene and agreed with you.
The acting is underwhelming here, I think Twilight stars at least pull enough effort to make commentary videos on that franchise worth watching.
I'd rather see sequels to The Last Vampire on Earth.
Okay, I watched it, and it is good in the "so bad it's good" sense.
My brother just saw this scene and agreed with you.
The acting is underwhelming here, I think Twilight stars at least pull enough effort to make commentary videos on that franchise worth watching.

It's less flattering if you mean "it's not bad enough" when calling it underwhelming.I promise you the RedLetterMedia commentary on this film is worth watching lol. Also, "underwhelming" may be the nicest thing one can saying about their performances.![]()

Not only that it would be very unlikely Pattinson would want to work with Stewart ever again.Radcliffe made an obvious effort to distance himself from Harry Potter in his subsequent career choices, but I don't think he has animosity toward it.
Pattinson just blatantly was done with Twilight while it was still ongoing, lol.
A brand name with a fanbase that has outgrown it.It's still a brand name.
A brand name with a fanbase that has outgrown it.
I just call it like I see it. All of the tweenage franchises from the past decade have all fizzled out and run their course (Twilight, The Hunger Games, Divergent, Maze Runner, Percy Jackson, etc). The only one that's endured is Harry Potter, even though that has more mass appeal. Over twenty years later and it still has a rabid fanbase. Sure, not counting the Fantastic Beasts series, there technically hasn't been a Harry Potter film in nearly a decade but if they get around to making that Cursed Child movie (and they will) and they bring the original cast back, they're looking at an easy billion at least.Won't know that until they try and it fails or succeeds. I think you're underestimating the prospect.
I just call it like I see it. All of the tweenage franchises from the past decade have all fizzled out and run their course (Twilight, The Hunger Games, Divergent, Maze Runner, Percy Jackson, etc). The only one that's endured is Harry Potter, even though that has more mass appeal. Over twenty years later and it still has a rabid fanbase. Sure, not counting the Fantastic Beasts series, there technically hasn't been a Harry Potter film in nearly a decade but if they get around to making that Cursed Child movie (and they will) and they bring the original cast back, they're looking at an easy billion at least.
The Hunger Games was pretty comparable in terms of box office. Well, it started a few years later, but still.