First let me address this. I don't like the way you've insinuated the ideas I have presented are exclusive to one particular ethnicity. Frankly, I think it's a gross and appalling mischaracterisation of what it is I have been saying and honestly, insulting. What you are getting entirely wrong about this whole thing is, like many people I've argued with before on similar topics, is the difference between the literal and the fantastic. Your position is one coming from a literal point of view, you're essentially saying literally anyone can be a hero at any size, and from that perspective you are 100% correct, literally anyone in real life , be it the guy walking his dog down the street, to the woman on her way to work, to the kid playing soccer with his or her friends in the park, can do a heroic act, help someone out, save someones life, etc. There is no argument from me there. But I'm talking about art and story. Art and story have always been exaggerated forms of real life, because like it or not, real life is for the most part ****ing boring. Here's an art history lesson for you - people prefer the fantasy. Why do you think certain stories have lasted literally thousands of years? It's because they are memorable for their heighten drama. Even in sport the drama is heightened when they add the cinematic music for the TV promo pieces, or the emotional music underneath the interview with the athlete who came from nothing to win the gold medal. Even the best documentaries in the world manipulate the subject matter to make it seem more interesting because we as a species are drawn to drama. People want the fantasy, they want the exaggerated, the extraordinary, the drama, the impossible, the idealistic. For gods sake dude, you're a member of a forum that is literally about this very thing. Superman is the perfect example of who we can be and that's why he is beloved. If you want to make a show filled with heroes of every body shape and size, then fine, knock yourself out, but be honest with yourself and say 'look, these idealic preferences exists, and I know it's probably not going to be for everyone, but I'm going to do my own thing'. And you know what? More power to you, that is exactly the attitude to have and will probably result in something better being made. But if you think by crapping on those preferences, calling them outdated or sexualised or socially engineered or whatever will change people's minds about the idealic human being in fantasy you're deluding yourself into thinking you can change human behaviour. That's not being honest with yourself or to your potential audience, and it leads to the very reaction you're making right now, an over simplification and unwarranted accusations simply because someone thinks the justifications for the design decisions are completely misguided.