New civil war tie-in covers

[Darthphere]

oh come on. lets ignore the very bad example i chose. a killer is a killer. cap is a killer. at least agree with that so i can sit back in that smug way that i do, while totally ignoring all the fair points you have made.
plus GNR4LIFE there must have been a punisher/ cap team-up before now.

Well im pretty sure he killed in WWII and other instances, but Punisher is a murderer, Cap kills to stop something really bad from happening. You can argue that Punisher does the same thing but breaking a pimps neck because he slapped his ho around isnt a good reason to be killing anyone.

 

[Darthphere]

thank you my good sir

 

[toya thegr8]

Wolverine versus Sentry. Hnh.

Elsewhere, H4H art by Tucci is alone worth checking out.

 

[Kotagg]

Wolverine had better get his goddamn ass handed to him in that little encounter.

 

[TheCorpulent1]

As little as I like Civil War and Iron Man at the moment, I absolutely love the Iron Man cover.

The blatant homage to wartime propaganda imagery is always fun to see.

 

[LouFerignoDemon]

Crappy analogy. Im saying, if the guy on the phone was really the mastermind behind all of this, something with him wouldve been mentioned about him or he wouldve shown up in the actual title by now. He could for all I know show up in #3 or furhter down the road, but something that big isnt going to be left in the Wolverine tie-in.

Or Marvel wants people to buy their comics, so they tie big crucial parts into other comics.

Don't go say "inconsequential", I just think it'd be an easy way for them to make a lot of money, since it is tied into Civil War and all. Wouldn't be the first time a large arc in another comic was kind of started in another title altogether. And Marvel, like any other business, is all about the money. So it's a big possibility it COULD be a big part.

 

[LouFerignoDemon]

As little as I like Civil War and Iron Man at the moment, I absolutely love the Iron Man cover.

The blatant homage to wartime propaganda imagery is always fun to see.

\



Who needs to make up something when someone made it for you?

 

[Tropico]

This is the cover people are saying Layla is in? WTF?! That's Bruiser with a froggy hat instead of her usual pink one. Check out the long flowing BROWN hair on the left side of her head.

 

[Darthphere]

Or Marvel wants people to buy their comics, so they tie big crucial parts into other comics.

Don't go ballistic, I just think it'd be an easy way for them to make a lot of money, since it is tied into Civil War and all. Wouldn't be the first time a large arc in another comic was kind of started in another title altogether.

Its already been said that everything concerning the actual event takes place in the Civil War comic, the tie-ins just explore different aspects of it.

 

[LouFerignoDemon]

Its already been said that everything concerning the actual event takes place in the Civil War comic, the tie-ins just explore different aspects of it.

Marvel isn't exactly the pillar of honesty.

 

[Darthphere]

This is the cover people are saying Layla is in? WTF?! That's Bruiser with a froggy hat instead of her usual pink one. Check out the long flowing BROWN hair on the left side of her head.

True, true.

 

[Darthphere]

Marvel isn't exactly the pillar of honesty.

Why would they lie about that though? It would make a lot more sense "Hey guys buy Wolverine, something big concerning Civil War is going on in there, huge shoicking events." As you said, they want people to buy more of their books, but they already said it isnt necessary.

 

[Tropico]

Or Marvel wants people to buy their comics, so they tie big crucial parts into other comics.

Don't go say "inconsequential", I just think it'd be an easy way for them to make a lot of money, since it is tied into Civil War and all. Wouldn't be the first time a large arc in another comic was kind of started in another title altogether. And Marvel, like any other business, is all about the money. So it's a big possibility it COULD be a big part.

Marvel has been touting that you don't need anything else but the main title of an event to get the full story. They made it really clear, it was also a dig at DC. Of course, I still believe that they'll take those words back from one moment to the other just like "dead is dead".

 

[Darthphere]

Marvel has been touting that you don't need anything else but the main title of an event to get the full story. They made it really clear, it was also a dig at DC. Of course, I still believe that they'll take those words back from one moment to the other just like "dead is dead".

I doubt it this time around seems to be holding up so far.

 

[LouFerignoDemon]

Why would they lie about that though? It would make a lot more sense "Hey guys buy Wolverine, something big concerning Civil War is going on in there, huge shoicking events." As you said, they want people to buy more of their books, but they already said it isnt necessary.

Neither is reading the Fantastic Four to read the Kree Skrull War to understand where the three cow Skrulls and such come from, since it explains it all away later in the series. Marvel, being the lovely little company it is, tends to RE-explain big things in bigger titles that had already happened in other titles. I could easily see this guy popping up a little later, and Wolverine saying something about it, blah blah blah. There, it's unnecessary to read it in the smaller title, but it was STILL a big part in a smaller title that inevitably tied into the bigger title.

 

[LouFerignoDemon]

Marvel has been touting that you don't need anything else but the main title of an event to get the full story. They made it really clear, it was also a dig at DC. Of course, I still believe that they'll take those words back from one moment to the other just like "dead is dead".

Noticed that too, huh? After Thanos said that, and something like two or three months later, two character were revived?

 

[Tropico]

I doubt it this time around seems to be holding up so far.

Meh, "the night is young".

 

[Darthphere]

Neither is reading the Fantastic Four to read the Kree Skrull War to understand where the three cow Skrulls and such come from, since it explains it all away later in the series. Marvel, being the lovely little company it is, tends to RE-explain big things in bigger titles that had already happened in other titles. I could easily see this guy popping up a little later, and Wolverine saying something about it, blah blah blah. There, it's unnecessary to read it in the smaller title, but it was STILL a big part in a smaller title that inevitably tied into the bigger title.

Yeah, I still stand behind that theyre not going to introduce the mastermind (if there is one) of the SHRA in Wolverine and then in Civil War. Thats too big of a revelation and storyline to leave out of the main title.

 

[Tropico]

Noticed that too, huh? After Thanos said that, and something like two or three months later, two character were revived?

LOL, how could I foget? JQ was going on and on about how Marvel was going to take this seriously and all the blah, blah, blah he gives selling you something (does anyone know if he was a used car salesman at one point?). Then they questioned him about it in a Joe Friday's and he gave a lenthy explanation as to why, but it was obvious that it was something that caught him with his pants down. When you can boil what a guy says down to "$h!t happens", you know you got 'im."

 

[LouFerignoDemon]

Yeah, I still stand behind that theyre not going to introduce the mastermind (if there is one) of the SHRA in Wolverine and then in Civil War. Thats too big of a revelation and storyline to leave out of the main title.

So was showing Spider Man unmasked in another comic before he did in a different comic, but the did that anyway.

And I'm not saying flat out, unmasked, show it to the world, and all of the sudden it comes in as known knowledge in the main comic. Just a little glimpse sort of thing. Bits and pieces.

 

[LouFerignoDemon]

LOL, how could I foget? JQ was going on and on about how Marvel was going to take this seriously and all the blah, blah, blah he gives selling you something (does anyone know if he was a used car salesman at one point?). Then they questioned him about it in a Joe Friday's and he gave a lenthy explanation as to why, but it was obvious that it was something that caught him with his pants down. When you can boil what a guy says down to "$h!t happens", you know you got 'im."

And the lengthy explanation was a load of bull****? Oh hell yeah. That was gold. Platinum even.

 

[Darthphere]

So was showing Spider Man unmasked in another comic before he did in a different comic, but the did that anyway.

And I'm not saying flat out, unmasked, show it to the world, and all of the sudden it comes in as known knowledge in the main comic. Just a little glimpse sort of thing. Bits and pieces.

Spider-Man unmasked happened first in Civil War. Period. You didnt see it anywhere else until after. I assume you referring to the Thunderbolts issue?

 

[LouFerignoDemon]

Spider-Man unmasked happened first in Civil War. Period. You didnt see it anywhere else until after. I assume you referring to the Thunderbolts issue?

Yeah, where they said it happened, before it ACTUALLY happened? Where it didn't flat out show it, but it still glimpsed it? Which is exactly what I'm saying could happen in Wolverine? Yeah.

 

[Tropico]

I'm still not digging the art in Heroes for Hire. I'd prefer they had used the Daughters of the Dragon artist. I like boobs, but there's something...like they're too perfectly spherical...I don't know, there's something disturbing about them.

 

[LouFerignoDemon]

I'm still not digging the art in Heroes for Hire. I'd prefer they had used the Daughters of the Dragon artist. I like boobs, but there's something...like they're too perfectly spherical...I don't know, there's something disturbing about them.

That they look absolutely fake, and done by a blind doctor in pakistan by shoving basketballs in there?