Zenien said:
Make sure to tell Nintendo that their handheld revision models are bad business.
Which is exactly why I called you clowns uneducated half-wits. Comparing apples with oranges.
Hardware manufacturers like Nintendo
need to come up with new and improved products at regular intervals to sustain themselves and expand their share. It's just the way the hardware market works - manufacturers constantly have to keep juggling with implimenting the advancements in technology, decreasing production costs and product longevity. The hardware business thrives on variety, flexible buying options and keeping up with the latest trends to stay competitive. This is especially true for products that employ dated technology.
Not a single one of Nintendo's "revised handhelds" offers any kind of substantial additions over the older ones. It's pretty much a case of either the new gizmo being "smaller" or "improved" in some way, but still basically the same as the older models.
I find it especially amusing that your ignorance prompts you to equate hardware manufacturers rolling out newer versions of the same product with that of double dipping by movie studios and game publishers, simply because they couldn't be any less identical.
Software typically has a lot less longevity than hardware, so periodic updates without any substantial additions in functionality trying to sustain a dated product are a waste of precious R&D and company resources in this business.
The difference that I'm aiming to highlight here is that Nintendo's revised handheld models have
nothing to do with "smart business" strategy, mainly because it is one of the most basic textbook tactics employed by hardware companies to stay functional.
I don't see how Konami
not releasing so-called "special editions" of it's heavyweight franchise would somehow compromise their market share in any way. It's just yet another despicable way of making a quick buck, that's all.