News for the WOLVERINE movie

javon

Superhero
Joined
Feb 11, 2006
Messages
6,041
Reaction score
3
Points
58
October 30, 2006 - Slowly but surely, Wolverine is coming together. According to star and producer Hugh Jackman, if all goes to plan, fans can look forward to seeing Wolvie in his first solo, big screen adventure in late spring of 2008.

"That's kind of what we're looking at right now," Jackman tells IGN. "A summer release would be great though. Perhaps that's possible. But some things still need to fall into place."

The first element that needs to fall into place is the screenplay. And the word from Jackman is screenwriter David Benioff "has delivered, big time. We now have the final script, the final draft, which I absolutely love. For me, it's the most superior of them all. I know the fans are going to go crazy for it."

Jackman and his producing partners inquired with a few screenwriters and considered story proposals. Inevitably, they were sold by Benihoff's knowledge of X-Men lore and enthusiasm for the Wolverine movie.


wolverine-20061030012653559.jpg

[SIZE=-2]20th Century Fox[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]
Hugh Jackman as Wolverine in X-Men: The Last Stand[/SIZE]



"Here's a guy who's this amazing writer, probably one of the hottest writers going in town; Spielberg and everyone are after him," says Jackman. "But he was beating down our door to make this movie because he's the most passionate Wolverine fan. He's followed all of the books since he was 9-years-old. For us, it's one of those rare combinations where you have a writer who has all these Oscar-winning directors wanting to work with and he's like, 'I want to do Wolverine!'"

As Jackman was working on The Prestige and other projects, he stayed in periodic contact with Beinhoff as he wrote the script.

"With someone like David, you mostly let him do his thing and he comes back with the script," he says. "He'd deliver a draft, we'd sit down together and talk about it. And I'd let him know what I think. If I think so, I'll say 'It's fantastic.' Or, 'We may have to go in this direction.' Or, 'What about this?' He's very collaborative."

Having played Wolverine for three films, Jackman says he was able to bring his unique perspective to the script.

"For better or worse, I've played the role for three movies so it's a character that I know. I feel like I know what I want to achieve with the film, but David has been very collaborative, and I'm not shy in telling him what I think. He'll say I disagree with you or whatever. But it's been a really terrific process so far."



wolverine-20061030012653122.jpg

[SIZE=-2]20th Century Fox[/SIZE]



What Jackman wants for Wolverine is this: "I don't want the film to appear at all like X-Men 4 in disguise. I want it to feel like a very fresh, whole new character piece. I want it to be a character movie. And by the end of the movie, I want it to be that you definitely knew who this guy was. Cool action, great characters, but ultimately that you totally know who Wolverine is. Like Mad Max and Dirty Harry. Characters I loved. He's a good guy, but he's not a nice guy. He's just the guy you want on your side. [David] really got that. He's one of the best character writers in Hollywood. He totally got it."

The next essential element is working Wolverine into Jackman's schedule. As the star and producer, he knows it will be a huge time commitment - probably three to four months of photography, some of which may take place in Australia, then considerable post-production.

"I'm shooting a movie with Baz Luhrmann and Nicole Kidman next year in Australia, and then we plan to do Wolverine after that."

And let's not forget about a director. "That's our next goal," says Jackman. "Now we have to find a director, which we're looking for now. If I see you guys maybe in about a month, I might be able to let you know who the director is. We're close."



http://movies.ign.com/articles/742/742513p1.html



Sounds pretty good overall, especially since they don't wanna go into a X4 disguise :woot: .
 
Oops, forgot about that. I suppose a mod will move it, or i'll just PM LS.
 
This script is the best of them all?

Didn't they say the same thing about X-Men: The Last Stand?

I know you're promoting this and all, Hugh, but do you really expect the fanbase to think that a SOLO film can possibly be the "best of the bunch" over 3 team films?

Sorry.
 
IT'S STILL THE WRONG FORUM!!!!

lol :p

I dunno but Hugh seems like a nice guy but he's so naive when it comes to promoting and "how the fans will feel". I suppose ppl in hollywood are fed good crap to speak like that.
 
<to GambitFire>Thats just the thing they did with X3. They said ''Fans will be satisfied". And the movie ended up not being fully developed at all. Fortunalety, I'm okay with seeing that happen to the Wolverine film :woot: .J/K I won't take my anger out on his movie because he was the some-what lead in all 3 movies.
 
I think the Wolverine movie has a great chance to be awesome. Maybe focusing on a few characters instead of 40...TLS...it will be better. I love Wolverine and if they get his character right...ala before the trilogy...then I think it has a chance to be better than the lot of them.
 
I wonder if that will do better than SpiderMan 3? Hell, half of the reason the X-men movie franchise did good was becauseof Wolverine, his solo movie is gonna rock (in cash) like hell.
 
No offense to Wolverine BUT I HIGHLY DOUBT IT COULD EVER DO BETTER THAN SM3

Wolverine helped X-Men but it's not the reason the franchise did good.

IMO.

I think the TAS following more than anything helped it do good, not too mentin the social issue within the story.
 
I'm glad there getting a really good writer for this movie and they said there going to take there time on the movie too. So yah I can't wait for this one.
 
gambitfire said:
No offense to Wolverine BUT I HIGHLY DOUBT IT COULD EVER DO BETTER THAN SM3

Wolverine helped X-Men but it's not the reason the franchise did good.

IMO.

I think the TAS following more than anything helped it do good, not too mentin the social issue within the story.
Oh I know, I was just saying MABE. I can't wait til SM3 makes a fol out of X3..I mean Wolverine :woot: .
 
javon said:
I wonder if that will do better than SpiderMan 3? Hell, half of the reason the X-men movie franchise did good was becauseof Wolverine, his solo movie is gonna rock (in cash) like hell.



No.

Wolverine will not come near Spidey in terms of numbers. Wolverine(solo) as unique and as dark as his story is, I don't see it really doing that well in the theaters. Simply because as popular as he is, he's not Superman, Spider-Man, or even Batman for instance.

The only way(IMO) to really make a great Wolverine film is to make it Rated R. Because then they can really make it dark, complex, and show Wolverine as part of the Weapon X program, Sabretooth, Omega Red, and Lady Deathstrike possibly.

But seriously, I'm bored of Wolverine and if I'm not mistaken, Batman Begins: The Dark Knight comes out in 2008. I don't see Wolverine putting up much of a fight in 2008 to be honest.
 
Nell2ThaIzzay said:
I know you're promoting this and all, Hugh, but do you really expect the fanbase to think that a SOLO film can possibly be the "best of the bunch" over 3 team films?

He's the producer as well...what's he supposed to say? It won't be as good as the other three but they'll do the best they can?

This is how people sell movies, folks.

It just keeps coming up because he's out there promoting other the other zillion movies he has coming out (btw, I saw a screening of "Flushed Away" this week--it's funny as hell, Hugh and Ian McKellen are bloody hilarious in it), and interviewers keep asking about it.

This isn't going to be a movie intended to be as big a Spiderman or Batman sequel, it's a smaller movie, smaller budget. They're not rolling this out as *the* comics movie of 2008.

But I am most definitely looking forward to it.
 
Nell2ThaIzzay said:
This script is the best of them all?

Didn't they say the same thing about X-Men: The Last Stand?

I know you're promoting this and all, Hugh, but do you really expect the fanbase to think that a SOLO film can possibly be the "best of the bunch" over 3 team films?

Sorry.

I disagree on that Nell. I really do. From an x-men fans perspective all they want to see is team team team. Films often do these type of things to study a character and flesh it out entirely, so from a film perspective this is a very smart move and would be very entertaining, unless its paced like x3 and cramps character development, thus making the whole idea of a spinoff useless :oldrazz:
 
he could say i hope this will be not so much this will be, because that way he doesn't come off as a scam artist :p lol j/k
 
Nell2ThaIzzay said:
This script is the best of them all?

Didn't they say the same thing about X-Men: The Last Stand?

I know you're promoting this and all, Hugh, but do you really expect the fanbase to think that a SOLO film can possibly be the "best of the bunch" over 3 team films?
I think you misunderstood, Nell. Hugh didn´t say the Wolverine script was "the most superior of them all" refering to the X-Men movies. He was talking about the scripts Benioff wrote, because the guy wrote like three or four different drafts. So Hugh said the last script was "the best of the bunch", and that they were ready to go on with it. :cwink:

I think Hugh is quite realistic when it comes to comparing Wolverine and X-Men. He knows Wolvie will be a smaller movie, not so much expensive, and will not attract the huge crowd films like Spidey and X-Men attract. It´ll be a grittier movie, even if it´s PG-13 (so I hope). He seems okay with it, and I really don´t give a damn if it won´t have the same box office as SM3 - I know it won´t. I just want a good movie - dark, intriguing, misterious, just like Logan himself.

And, huge crowds or not, wrong forum or not, I can´t wait for it! :woot::up:
 
I sincerely hope it flops that way it'll leave egg on the faces of every single Fox executive. I really don't see a point for spin-off films. Didn't Fox learn anything from Elektra?
 
LastSunrise1981 said:
I sincerely hope it flops that way it'll leave egg on the faces of every single Fox executive. I really don't see a point for spin-off films. Didn't Fox learn anything from Elektra?
Wolverine has absolutely NO comparison with Elektra, when talking about Marvel characters. He´s WAY more known, as part of the X-Men and solo character.
So don´t try to come with Elektra comparisons just because you hate Wolverine or Fox or whatever...
 
There are no words on that script can make that movie not suck. The final knife in the fanbase back is .....PG-13! Yulp. That will totally make it an INO more than non-Selina Kyle did for CINO.

Again, for farther proff of how wrong it will be, look at his movie introduction. Not one element from his cannon past was there. Wait, that's wrong. He was forgot stuff, and got porked from behind with the adamantium.

Thanks to X2, his backround will forever be linked and center chain of religious zealot Styker...oh wait. That is wrong in so many ways. Ugg.

With Marvel pumping out superheroes in every damn venue (THE GUIDING LIGHT...oh god was that terrible, and so was all the not-so-subtle Marvel advertising), with Heroe's too, and the next five years full of superheroes movies, the market will be oversaterated.

Spin offs are a good way annoy people. X4...err I mean Wolverine will take us there. Good Job!
 
Loganbabe said:
Wolverine has absolutely NO comparison with Elektra, when talking about Marvel characters. He´s WAY more known, as part of the X-Men and solo character.
So don´t try to come with Elektra comparisons just because you hate Wolverine or Fox or whatever...

Exactly. "Elektra" spunoff from "Daredevil," whose entire domestic box office was less money than X3 made on it's opening weekend alone. It didn't have nearly the following of the X-Men series, and the character isn't nearly as popular.

And I doubt they're spending the kind of money that would bankrupt the studio if it flops.
 
Loganbabe said:
Wolverine has absolutely NO comparison with Elektra, when talking about Marvel characters. He´s WAY more known, as part of the X-Men and solo character.
So don´t try to come with Elektra comparisons just because you hate Wolverine or Fox or whatever...

Elektra IS a popular character as well. To say Elektra isn't well known is a flat out lie from a Logan fanatic who's not familiar with the comics or comic history.

Elektra is one of the main reasons why Daredevil was so great, as great of a character he is, the story between him and Elektra being the badass she is has her own comic and has been popular for the same amount of years as Wolverine has been around. Nice try.

I hate the overexposure of Wolverine and I hate Fox. Don't get mad at me because you love Fox and Wolverine. :yay:
 
LastSunrise1981 said:
I sincerely hope it flops that way it'll leave egg on the faces of every single Fox executive. I really don't see a point for spin-off films. Didn't Fox learn anything from Elektra?

I sure hope so, then theyll get a spinoff correct. Doesnt mean to throw the whole idea into the trash.
 
danoyse said:
Exactly. "Elektra" spunoff from "Daredevil," whose entire domestic box office was less money than X3 made on it's opening weekend alone. It didn't have nearly the following of the X-Men series, and the character isn't nearly as popular.

And I doubt they're spending the kind of money that would bankrupt the studio if it flops.

I advise you to educate yourself on the popularity of Elektra and Daredevil.

To say Elektra and Daredevil don't have the same following as the X-Men series is like saying Batman doesn't have a following. It'll be nice watching Wolverine have its ass handed to it by The Dark Knight though.
 
LastSunrise1981 said:
It'll be nice watching Wolverine have its ass handed to it by The Dark Knight though.

:woot::o

Yea, again. I totally cheered in [BLACKOUT]The Prestige when Batman shot Wolverine then set him on fire.[/BLACKOUT] Greatest moment ever!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"