Spider-Bat
BATMAN
- Joined
- May 24, 2007
- Messages
- 1,471
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
While an interesting experiment, it's probably not a good ideato shoe horn too much reality into the Fantasy realm of the superhero.
Oncea depictionveers toward realism, each new detail releases a torrent of questions that exposes the absurdity at the heart of the genre.
The more realistic Superheroes become, the less believable they are.
It's a delicate balance.But this much I do know: Superheroes are real when they're drawn in ink.
-David Mazzuchelli
This is so true. Why would you want to take something meant to be other worldly and make it realistic, it takes away from the fun of it all, everything doesn't need to be explained, and the explanation that is given in thecomic book is all that is needed. The comic films that over do it on the explanations and over do the reality are not that successful, and ruin the material.
Whatever they come up with in the comics is always more entertaining and better than what they come up with in the comic movies.
I don't want some director's take on my favorite heroes, I just want to see that comic book come to life. That's what I've waited all these years to see, so when I hear they're making a movie of one of my faves I think oh great I get to see that Superhero come to life because I like how he/she is in the book, the comic I know, but I don't want to hear, oh we're making it different just 'cause we don't have the imagination to make it the way it is.
Otherwise, why make Starwars, The Lord of the Rings, Spider-man and so on.
The thinking of making these realistic is down right dumb. Would you make a comedy and then say well, we won't make it funny 'cause people won't want that from a comedy? No, that makes no sense. And that is how it should be with comics, don't say, that Superhero shouldn't have a costume 'cause people won't get it, that makes no sense, fan or not, that person will see that the movie is about a Super Hero and expect him to wear a costume, 'cause that's what superheroes wear. Duh!
The X-men were ruined by a director with no imagination, Superman Returns had the mythos of Superman screwed with too much with the kid, and how could Superman lift a whole island of Kryptonite?
Why wouldn't the X-men wear their costumes? Forget leather. That wa done just 'cause the matrix was popular at the time Singer admitted it.
Why couldn't Ra's al ghul have his lazarus pits? Sure would've been more interesting. That's what I expected at first, then I heard about Nolan's b.s. about realism, here we go again. UGH!!! Why did the scarecrow keep taking his mask off? Because Nolan didn't want him to wear it in the first place and Goyer had to talk him into it. why have Batman dress as a Bat then? Why do it at all?
Crap or get off the pot. Don't act like you're too good to make a comic book film, if you're embarrassed by it, then don't do it.
Oncea depictionveers toward realism, each new detail releases a torrent of questions that exposes the absurdity at the heart of the genre.
The more realistic Superheroes become, the less believable they are.
It's a delicate balance.But this much I do know: Superheroes are real when they're drawn in ink.
-David Mazzuchelli
This is so true. Why would you want to take something meant to be other worldly and make it realistic, it takes away from the fun of it all, everything doesn't need to be explained, and the explanation that is given in thecomic book is all that is needed. The comic films that over do it on the explanations and over do the reality are not that successful, and ruin the material.
Whatever they come up with in the comics is always more entertaining and better than what they come up with in the comic movies.
I don't want some director's take on my favorite heroes, I just want to see that comic book come to life. That's what I've waited all these years to see, so when I hear they're making a movie of one of my faves I think oh great I get to see that Superhero come to life because I like how he/she is in the book, the comic I know, but I don't want to hear, oh we're making it different just 'cause we don't have the imagination to make it the way it is.
Otherwise, why make Starwars, The Lord of the Rings, Spider-man and so on.
The thinking of making these realistic is down right dumb. Would you make a comedy and then say well, we won't make it funny 'cause people won't want that from a comedy? No, that makes no sense. And that is how it should be with comics, don't say, that Superhero shouldn't have a costume 'cause people won't get it, that makes no sense, fan or not, that person will see that the movie is about a Super Hero and expect him to wear a costume, 'cause that's what superheroes wear. Duh!
The X-men were ruined by a director with no imagination, Superman Returns had the mythos of Superman screwed with too much with the kid, and how could Superman lift a whole island of Kryptonite?

Why wouldn't the X-men wear their costumes? Forget leather. That wa done just 'cause the matrix was popular at the time Singer admitted it.

Why couldn't Ra's al ghul have his lazarus pits? Sure would've been more interesting. That's what I expected at first, then I heard about Nolan's b.s. about realism, here we go again. UGH!!! Why did the scarecrow keep taking his mask off? Because Nolan didn't want him to wear it in the first place and Goyer had to talk him into it. why have Batman dress as a Bat then? Why do it at all?
Crap or get off the pot. Don't act like you're too good to make a comic book film, if you're embarrassed by it, then don't do it.