No X-4

narrows101

Guest
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
5,039
Reaction score
0
Points
31
The business of making movies.

http://www.hollywoodwiretap.com/?module=news&action=story&id=4537

EXCLUSIVE: WHY 'PIRATES 4' COULD FLY AND WHY 'X-4' DIDN'T HAPPEN
By Josh Young

It’s blockbuster or bust. Nothing epitomizes the current studio culture more than 20th Century Fox’s decision not to go forward with a fourth installment of “X-Men,” but rather to create a spin-off “Wolverine” franchise. Nothing, that is, except Disney’s newest juggernaut, “Pirates of the Caribbean.”

It’s fitting then that “Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest” recently passed “X-Men: The Last Stand” (third in that series) as the top grossing movie of 2006. From here, however, the two franchises are going in opposite directions.

Fox, the studio with a reputation for making the toughest deals in town, says the “X-Men” franchise has run its creative course. Despite director Bret Ratner stepping in for Bryan Singer and delivering the goods on the third “X-Men” movie, with $458 million worldwide and counting, Fox co-chairmen Tom Rothman and Jim Gianopulos had decided even before the film opened not to develop a fourth installment.

“They drive the toughest deal, no question about it,” one top manager says. “They run a solid, no-nonsense business, but there will be opportunities they miss because of this management style. ‘X-Men’ may be one of them.”

Disney, however, had already started production on a third “Pirates” movie before releasing the second one on July 7. Reportedly subtitled “At World’s End,” the third “Pirates” film opens May 27, 2007.

“The hardest part was getting everybody together at the same time period,” producer Jerry Bruckheimer told darkhorizons.com. “That’s why we made two movies. To get Gore (Verbiniski), (writers Ted) Elliot and (Terry) Rossio, the three lead actors – that’s the hard part. Scheduling is really difficult. Then making the deal, especially when you come off a successful picture everybody deserves more money, and of course Disney always wants to make it for less. So you have a real problem.”

The cost of the second and third “Pirates” together has been reported as high as $450 million. But with all the production delays due to constant weather problems and a long hiatus improvised into the schedule of the third film, one producer who works with Disney claims the cost is “over a half a billon for both films.” Production on the third film ramps up again this fall for 70 additional days of shooting.

A 'PIRATES 4' SCORECARD
Historically, the decision to greenlight second and third installments simultaneously has met with mixed results. New Line scored big with this strategy on “Lord of the Rings,” while on Warners’ “Matrix” and Universal’s “Back to the Future” franchises, when number two didn’t deliver, number three petered out at the box office.

But never mind history and hurricanes. There’s already talk that Disney is thinking about a fourth installment. For his part, director Gore Verbinski told Entertainment Weekly he hoped “there was no reason to ever make a pirate movie again,” but Johnny Depp countered with “never say never.”

If there is a “Pirates 4,” look for it to be the most expensive motion picture ever made when budget and first-dollar gross are taken into consideration.
According to a rival studio executive and several agents queried, the gross out on the second and third “Pirates” movies is 32.5 percent, which is above the artificial first-dollar gross topline of 27.5 percent that studios claim they will not exceed these days.

The exec tallies the backend as follows: Depp 20; Bruckheimer 10 (up from his customary 7.5), and Verbinski 2.5 of first-dollar gross. Two of the agents tallied it differently among the principles, but came up with the same 32.5 total.

“On another sequel, Disney not only has to contend with the same backend but it will have to sweeten Orlando (Bloom) and Keira’s (Knightley) deals by putting even more gross out, or paying more upfront,” explains one agent. The only way they don’t go above 32.5 is if Gore doesn’t come back.”
Bloom and Knightley reportedly received huge salary raises on “Dead Man’s Chest.” (Bloom’s take was pegged at $11.9 million for the both films, plus 2.5-3 percent of adjusted gross.) For a fourth film, both could easily ask for first-dollar gross and/or upfront raises.

But will Disney even make any money on “Dead Man’s Chest”?
You bet it will.

In its first 17 days, “Dead Man’s Chest” grossed $321 million. Assuming a 90/10 studio/theater split the first weekend falling to 80/20 the second week and to 70/30 the third, Disney has collected roughly $269 million domestically. Of that amount, it will have paid out about $87 million in first dollar gross, leaving the studio with $182 million after just 17 days. Add the $214 million-and-rapidly climbing foreign receipts as well as home video yet to come and big-time returns are at hand.

The studio’s internal projected worldwide gross for “Dead Man’s Chest” is upwards of $700 million, according to one agent who recently spoke to Disney chairman Dick Cook. Even with bonzo production and marketing costs and 32.5 of the gross out, profits will still be in the stratosphere once all ancillaries are counted.

'THE NEW MOUSE ORDER'
Despite a potential $250-300 million price tag, “Pirates 4” fits snugly into the studio’s newly revamped business plan. Many blanched at the idea of 12-13 Disney-branded films per year (down from roughly 18) and significantly less studio overhead. How will Disney fill its production pipelines, they asked? How will it maintain revenue and profit levels? Making bigger movies better seems to be one answer. Sure, "Pirates 4" will cost a lot of loot, but all the money goes to the movie — a near-sure thing — and not to dubious development deals and iffy mid-level movies.

“The new mouse order,” carps one agent.

Back to “X-Men and Fox.” With “The Last Stand” battling its way past half a billion at the box office, why not do a fourth?

Because it’s too expensive. “The Last Stand” cost roughly $210 million and carries gross players in Marvel Entertainment, stars Hugh Jackman and Halle Berry, producer Lauren Shuler Donner and director Brett Ratner.

“‘X-Men’ has 16 characters to bring back,” explains one of the participants. “That’s why it was such an expensive movie. It’s easier to make ‘Pirates 4.’ You don’t have such a huge cast. Plus, since ‘X Men’ has come out a lot has happened. Halle’s won an Oscar. Ian McKellen has been in ‘Lord of the Rings’. All of that affects the movie.”

And Fox is not Disney. The studio generally insists on its tentpoles costing less and its talent profits being lower than others do.

Consider the saga of “Used Guys,” the Jay Roach comedy that was to star Jim Carrey and Ben Stiller. Due to a miscommunication between business affairs and production, the budget jumped from $104 to $113 million, with 27.5 percent of the gross out to the three creatives, according to one executive involved in the deal. Fox’s Rothman and Gianopulos simply pulled the plug.

“Tom (Rothman) hates the idea of paying directors and giving final cut, except to certain artists,” says one manager who does business regularly with Fox. “On ‘Wolverine,’ they still have to pay Hugh and Marvel. Maybe they don’t feel it’s worth it to pay Lauren Shuler Donner and Halle Berry and whoever directs.”

Fox’s reasoning is, rather than risking $200-plus million and paying out more than 25 percent of the gross on another “X-Men” movie, why not make a “Wolverine” that costs far less and carries fewer gross profit participants?

Meanwhile over at Disney, if “Pirates 4” doesn’t get the go-ahead, Bruckheimer will be plenty busy putting together “National Treasure 2” — and maybe even a 2/3 combo if things go well for “Pirates 3” in May.
So which studio’s plan will work? Maybe both. Fox’s tightfistedness has already delivered years of “record profits” according to Rothman and Gianopulos. And with a franchise like “Pirates,” it’s pretty hard for Disney to go wrong.
 
Great! Just friggin great. This makes me want to cover my hand in spikes and fist Rothman.

Disney has finally had thier revenge. Go Mickey.

Pirates has such a pull on its audience, where they could literally set all the characters on fire and the people would say, "Wow, that was fantastic!" Disney and Bruckhiemer can do no wrong. ( I really liked National Treasure, BTW. I'm looking foward to the sequel.)

Were as X-men could make everything right, please every fan base, and people whould still hate it. There is no recovery. Singer washed them out, Ratner made them shallow, and Rothman sold them out and got his jollies.
 
Nice. I always thought x4 would kill the franchise potentially. The spinoffs need to have less sfx budget and more story.
 
as long as they have a younger x-men movie (rogue, bobby, peter, kitty) ill be happy, bc i could care less about the mag and logan films
 
Yeah, right. They'll make one in time, just watch. They always say crap like this with other movies, but what do they do? They still make more sequels.
 
I wouldn't be surprised if they did make another one.

But seeing as FOX have now publicaly said they no longer wanna do anymore X-Men movies, maybe they will sell the rights back to Marvel, who could then make some more, as they know have their own movie production company, am I'm not mistaken.
 
Mothling said:
I wouldn't be surprised if they did make another one.

But seeing as FOX have now publicaly said they no longer wanna do anymore X-Men movies, maybe they will sell the rights back to Marvel, who could then make some more, as they know have their own movie production company, am I'm not mistaken.

I hope Marvel does get the rights back, but i think it will be too late if the spinoffs arent good.
 
spark627 said:
as long as they have a younger x-men movie (rogue, bobby, peter, kitty) ill be happy, bc i could care less about the mag and logan films

ditto:up:
 
They really like screwing both the franchise and the fans over.
 
Specter313 said:
Yeah, right. They'll make one in time, just watch. They always say crap like this with other movies, but what do they do? They still make more sequels.

That is true. Once someone shows them a powerpoint presentation with lots of pie charts and big numbers with a $ in front of it, they'll make more.
 
DAM FOX!!!!!!!!!

I do not want to see a Wolverine solo movie. With X-Men 4 they could have fix or at lease tried to fix the X-Men after the third movie.

They have just given up. How sad! It is really too bad. The first 2 movies were great.
 
Someone explain to me please how long does the studio own the rights?

I know awhile back anne rice was about to get the rights back to her novels when the studio rushed and made queen of the damned just to do something before they lost it.
 
phoenixstorm said:
Someone explain to me please how long does the studio own the rights?

I know awhile back anne rice was about to get the rights back to her novels when the studio rushed and made queen of the damned just to do something before they lost it.

I believe FOX has the rights for 4 more years.
 
Good thing names were named. Let those who are not in-the-know know the evil that is Rothman.
 
Because it’s too expensive. “The Last Stand” cost roughly $210 million and carries gross players in Marvel Entertainment, stars Hugh Jackman and Halle Berry, producer Lauren Shuler Donner and director Brett Ratner.

THEN DON'T SPEND $200 MILLION ON IT. X1 and X2's budgets were fine.
 
WorthyStevens4 said:
THEN DON'T SPEND $200 MILLION ON IT. X1 and X2's budgets were fine.
I think probably if you translate the dollars from 2000 and 2003 when those two movies were made it would probably be the same or close to X-3. Big budget movies are expensive to make.
 
WorthyStevens4 said:
THEN DON'T SPEND $200 MILLION ON IT. X1 and X2's budgets were fine.

This is one reason from the article why it cost more than the first two:

Plus, since ‘X Men’ has come out a lot has happened. Halle’s won an Oscar. Ian McKellen has been in ‘Lord of the Rings’. All of that affects the movie.”

It's true...some of these actors are a lot more well-known than they were since the first movie. Plus X1 wasn't a sure thing 6 years ago. Now it is...and it was going to cost them a fortune to get everyone back and make everyone happy at the same time.

Disney paid through the roof, reportedly, to get all 3 main characters back for the POTC sequels. They even sent an apology letter to Johnny Depp for questioning his performance in POTC1. Imagine bringing back 16?

I can understand the business decision. But it still sucks. :mad:
 
I always said FOX would rather stick to Wolverine Solo Movies. But it would not surprise me tall if they did go ahead & make a 4th X-Men Movie. BUT knowing FOX & how they are Wolverine ****es they will stick with the Wolverine Solo Movies making Wolverine into his own franchise
 
The true face of the devil

TomRothman_Grani_7187128_400.jpg
 
Right, this call's for a personal visit to Fox...
 
Pauluz said:
That's a big Jew!

:rolleyes:

There's no need to bring everyone back. Leave out Wolverine and just bring back James Marsden, Ben Foster, Kelsey Grammer, and some of the younger kids.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"