The Dark Knight Nolan talks more TDK

Milkman95

Movie Extra & Actor
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Messages
15,817
Reaction score
187
Points
73
I think this is a new interview with some great new stuff. If it's been posted before, I apologize. Enjoy, Nolan really knows Batman and his world in my opinion............

Much of “Batman Begins” was about Bruce Wayne coming to terms with what he is and what he does. Will you need to modulate his inner struggle in a sequel?

What do you mean by “modulate”?

Well, at the end of the first film, he sort of comes to terms with what he’s doing. He’s got this mission now. So I’d imagine that mission will have to evolve a bit.

Oh, yes. Or the world … Let me put it this way, without being too specific: When you embark on a mission, it’s extraordinarily rare that things turn out according to the mission plan. [laughs] The world is going to react in ways you don’t expect.

He did indeed achieve a certain sense of purpose or a certain resignation, in terms of how his life is going to wind up being dedicated to this — which is something that we begin with. But the world itself responds to our actions in ways we don’t anticipate.

You said something interesting about introducing The Joker at the end of “Batman Begins”: “That’s the point of the final scene. That [fighting evil] is not going to be easy. It’s going to get harder.” Is that a touchstone for the sequel?

Very much. Obviously, I can’t really talk much about it at this stage — but I think if you watch that last scene, it gives you a very, very clear direction of where the story’s going.

When Commissioner Gordon turns over that playing card, there’s a sense of dread.

Yeah.

Are the villains going to try to define themselves as extremely as Batman defines himself?

Yeah, in their own way.

Are you drawing any inspiration from Alan Moore’s “Killing Joke” — which made a point of grounding The Joker not in this “Clown Prince of Crime” stuff, but more in sadness and failure?

We’re drawing from the entire canon. I don’t want to talk too specifically about it. The thing I will say is that if you go back to the very first appearance of the Joker in the comics …

Which I’ve read. And he’s a bastard.

[emphatically] Yeah. And there’s a very clear direction … It’s pretty surprising how clearly drawn that character is in that book.

If you’ve read those early stories, Heath Ledger makes sense as a casting choice.

It certainly makes sense to me.

We got to see a lot more of Bruce Wayne out of costume in “Batman Begins” than in the prior “Batman” movies. He was also a lot more fun — buying hotels and engineering corporate takeovers. Will Batman’s alter ego play as prominent a role in the sequel?

Yeah. I mean, Bruce, to me, isn’t just Batman. There are also aspects of Bruce Wayne that are private and public.

Given how muted “Batman Begins” was, in terms of tone and color, do you see any risks in overstuffing a movie with colorful villains?

Well, you have to be careful about everything. [long, long pause]

[laughs] Well. You’ve said, “I actually see myself as a very mainstream filmmaker and always have.” Why do some people keep pegging you — even after “Batman Begins” — as an art-house director?

God, I have no idea. [laughs] The press tends to pigeonhole filmmakers from where they begin — which is actually not necessarily completely wrong — but I directed a “Batman” film, and people still talk about my independent-filmmaking roots.

Ridley Scott is a favorite filmmaker of mine — and for years, anything he did was immediately related to advertising, because he started out there. He’s only just about past it.

I certainly don’t have any complaints if people relate what I do to the independent films I started with. I would hope that all my films would have a personal and sincere foundation — whether they’re on a grand scale or not.

Certainly all your films have trafficked in misdirection. Even in “Batman Begins,” with Liam Neeson’s character.

Well, Batman is an interesting case in point, because you’re dealing with a mythic character. And one of the qualities of mythic stories is familiarity — and, to a certain extent, predictability.

I don’t mean “predictability” in its usual pejorative sense. I mean it in the sense of the inevitable thing — the thing that allows a story to take on the character.

There’s a tension in the storytelling between the familiar elements that make up the myth and being able to surprise people. What it ultimately amounts to is a need for the filmmaker to achieve the inevitable in surprising ways.

Right. Superhero movies are prone to discussions of whether they’re “faithful” or not … Superhero fans want their characters to be comforting, in a way.

That’s exactly the tension I’m talking about. It’s something I find very interesting. Because to me, being faithful to the character in the story is not about slavishly following a particular treatment of one comic or graphic novel — it’s about distilling the essence of the myth.

That’s always been the challenge of Batman, and its strength. You treat the essential elements as mileposts, and all the elements in between — all the other layers and threads — can be fresh and different and surprising. Get that stuff right, and you see the myth in a powerful way.

On a superficial level, when we approached re-designing the Batmobile, we weren’t too specific about what it had to be — other than that it had to be the most powerful car you’ve ever seen. And it had to be black. Other than that, we didn’t say, “It has to have a fin,” or anything like that. And so you’re able to create something completely original and fresh — a renewed concept of “the most powerful car.”

Well, having read the original comics, we’re just lucky you didn’t make it a red sedan. Is the script for “Dark Knight” finished?

I couldn’t tell you that.

Of course you couldn’t.

A script’s never finished with me. I write even as we’re shooting. But we’ve been working at it for quite a while now.

Will the title be “The Dark Knight”? Or do you think it will end up being “Batman — colon — The Dark Knight”?

No, it’ll be “The Dark Knight.”

It sets such a tone.

Yes. Well, that’s the idea.

You’ve said you’re not a huge Internet hound. Were you able to stay away from the ’net during the “Batman Begins” pre-release brouhaha?

Yeah, yeah. Certainly, when you’re making a film that everybody’s watching, you’re going to read a lot of stuff about your film and you’re not necessarily going to like all of it. So. If you’re happy doing that, fine. If you’re not…

When you take on something like Batman, that increases exponentially, and you’re already being hit from all kinds of other directions … I don’t have e-mail.

You know, with “The Prisoner,” you’re going to go through that again with an entirely different obsessive cult.

Yeah. Well. You know. I’ve been through it once before. You have to get on and do what it is you’re going to do. Which is not the same thing as being in any way disrespectful of the material. You have to take responsibility for yourself and get on with it and do a good job.
 
"it’s about distilling the essence of the myth."
:up:

"No, it’ll be “The Dark Knight.”"
:up::up:

"Well, you have to be careful about everything. [long, long pause] "
:huh:
 
That was a great read and when asked if the script is finished Nolan replies he shoots while he writes as well so he's never finished. I like that you can think of new ideas while you have the actors on set.
 
where did ya get this great interview?
 
Ronny Shade said:
"it’s about distilling the essence of the myth."
:up:

"No, it’ll be “The Dark Knight.”"
:up::up:

"Well, you have to be careful about everything. [long, long pause] "
:huh:

I think when he talks about being careful it's about taking liberties with a character like The Joker - you really can't.......
 
Milkman95 said:
I think when he talks about being careful it's about taking liberties with a character like The Joker - you really can't.......
As long as he's not talking about being careful and not putting the joker in colorful suits :up:
 
Man I was hoping he would explain himself as far as Why he went that direction w/ Ras al Ghul. CRAP
 
Excellent interview, and Nolan is right, often the problem with the fans is they get to fetishistic about certain details or storylines and forget the myth is about more than that and you can preserve essential elements and still come up with different things. It´s not the car having fins or not that defines Batman.
 
chosen1 said:
Man I was hoping he would explain himself as far as Why he went that direction w/ Ras al Ghul. CRAP
What direction? In essence, Ra´s Al Ghul is someone who thinks he can heal the world by tearing it apart. Whether he´s immortal or not, is left to the moviegoer to wonder. Which I find pretty fun.
 
ultimatefan said:
What direction? In essence, Ra´s Al Ghul is someone who thinks he can heal the world by tearing it apart. Whether he´s immortal or not, is left to the moviegoer to wonder. Which I find pretty fun.

What Direction????

How about the direction of completely eraseing the character of Henri ducard and making him Ra's.

And how instead of making bruces first encounter w/ Ras a matter of rescueing his kidnapped daughter actually have Ra's train him.

Maybe....
 
very nice interview, more like this should be appearing within the next week or so as we get closer to The Prestige
 
Excellent news and interview! I may be a bit biased being a MASSIVE Nolan fan/idolizer, but everything he says about this film makes me feel very safe and excited! I even love that he's fielding questions about The Prisoner at this early stage!

Now, if only he'd cast Andy Serkis as The Penguin!!!
 
Great interview but would Milkman be so kind to post a link?:yay:
 
chosen1 said:
What Direction????

How about the direction of completely eraseing the character of Henri ducard and making him Ra's.

And how instead of making bruces first encounter w/ Ras a matter of rescueing his kidnapped daughter actually have Ra's train him.

Maybe....

Oh noes!!! It was approached differently to the comics!!! What an ******* Nolan is.
 
Sane Man said:
Oh noes!!! It was approached differently to the comics!!! What an ******* Nolan is.

I would 'nt say all that I was just looking for an explination.
 
Milkman95 said:
[emphatically] Yeah. And there’s a very clear direction … It’s pretty surprising how clearly drawn that character is in that book.


If you’ve read those early stories, Heath Ledger makes sense as a casting choice.

It certainly makes sense to me.
:woot: :up:
 
Being a Batman fan aside, I just flat out like this guy. He brings a quality to everything he does and doesn't treat "filmgoers" like they're dumb. Its also good to see him talking about #6 already. I can't wait to see his take on that.
 
Great read, excellent interview :up:

I love reading Nolan's thoughts.

So now we can say that Nolan is going to use somehow Arkham prisoners (they escaped in 1st movie) maybe they will be some kind of Joker's henchmen like it happened in TMWL :up:

And, we will see Bruse as playboy person again! BTW, this is great to hear how Nolan is trying to be faithful to Batman as icon and comics itself.

And yes, keep TDK as a full title.
 
nolan is on a different level....on a level that singer will never be.
 
Nolan and Singer are different people and they moake different movies about different things. If you hate Singer just hate Singer and **** about it. He's got nothing to do with this.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
201,159
Messages
21,907,671
Members
45,704
Latest member
BMD
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"