Nominations: Which movie sequel was the most disappointing?

Wow, that's a lot of rules for a fairly self explanatory thread. Anyway my nomination goes for Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, just doesn't fit well with the other two, no Nazis, Indy wasn't after a Christain artifact, didn't hint at his day job, he pretty much literally fell out of the sky into the plot, had an annoying kid sidekick and the girl was really annoying.

 

Are these rules deliberately redundant?

 

Speed 2, Speed 2, and....Speed 2.

 

You're so bossy.

 

It's a sad day if people are that stupid.

 

caddyshack 2
grease 2
Sandlot 2

 

are you kidding me? there are oodles of terrible sequels to great movies out there and you choose Temple of Doom? yeah, it was different than the other two, but that was a good thing. Last Crusade, as cool as it was, felt like a rehash of Raiders.

 

Godfather part III,

 

Then it's a sad day.

 

Alien3

 

So? Indy is not Winston Churchill.

So?

So?

I don't see how any of these are relevent to the quality of the film.

If you said, "It's badly written" or "it's Spielberg's laziest movie" or "it's just a rollercoaster ride of stunts and nastiness with very little plot" then you'd have a case.

 

Attack of the Clones was a huge letdown. I thought The Phantom Menace was weak, but surely that was just because Lucas was getting warmed up and surely Episode II would take out the trash? Sadly it's the worst of the series and I recall sitting in the cinema convincing myself not to walk out.

 

The crow 2, not a bad movie but not even close to the greatness of the first.

 

Menace was worse for me.

 

superman returns, I smell a stinker i just saw the trailer with MI:3 Routh is in no way in hell superman, the cast for this film sucked arse!!!

 

You can be so f-ing dumb some times...

 

ri-f***in-diculous...

 

Edit; doh

 

Superman 4.



And I agree with GAH, I think SR is goin' to be crud.

 

Not a sequel.

 

It only takes one to ruin a good thread, and a whole bunch of people like myself to put the final nail in the coffin

Anyway I say Robocop 2 was pretty disappointing, Robocop 3 was not due to the suckitude of 2. I mean the problem with Robocop 2 is that it so superficial. The reason people loved Robocop 1 was because it was fresh and different, and it hit so many levels especially with satire. Robocop 2 basically took Robocop 1 and just remade it with more violent, more over the top characters, and the same point, it simply just came out not that great. But there are some memorable parts to it such as the Robocop 2 process, Cain, and the mayor subplot.

 

You're an expert at that

Coffee.