Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]286716[/split]
Pokemon is a dead trend. It was great at it's prime, but they ruined by getting rid of Ash and alot of key playersNo one posts in the Pokemon thread
man, i gotta say. Skyward was a step down compared to Twilight Princess. Twilight Princess was pure epicness
im surprised nobody is talking about the released Timeline?
DEFEATS GANON, BUT STAYS IN THE FUTURE
Windwaker
Phantom Hourglass
Spirit Tracks
That means all the original old games are in a third timeline that nobody knew. I think i need to play "A Link to the Past" to understand the third timeline better.I only just found out about it. What I don't get is how is it split into three timelines? But other than that, it totally makes sense.
I don't see the problem with three timelines. The Wind Waker specifically states that the Hero of Time banished Ganon, yes? Well, A Link to the Past details the major points of the Imprisoning War where Ganondorf became Ganon, yet only mentions the Sages, not a Hero. So either the people telling the story remembered the villain and completely forgot about Link, or there's a timeline where the Sages had to do the heavy lifting.
I'm not big on the timeline debate, but I've always figured A Link to the Past as the square peg amongst the round (triangular?) holes. The first origin story was clearly developed before anyone on the development team had an inkling as to what "Zelda 64" would be about. So the only clean way to fit the classic games into the overarching story is an alternate timeline/universe.