CantThinkOfAName
Avenger
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2001
- Messages
- 23,127
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
But that really wouldn't have an effect on the deterioration of Hyrule on account that Termina is in a completely different dimension and Link still managed to stop Ganondorf, which is what caused Hyrule to fall.
The third timeline is to show just how downhill Hyrule went with Link's failure. And overall, I'm fine with this, the third timeline created by Link failing to defeat Ganon/dorf really does make the entire series fit overall.
But this event doesn't ever happen in any game. If that was the case, then every game should have an alternate timeline where Link loses. Hell, if that's the case, then every game should have alternate endings.
And it doesn't really fit the story that well. Link losing implies that Ganon continues to rule the kingdom, which isn't the case at the start of A Link to the Past (although further games can explain this gap).
I mean, its not the biggest deal ever, but I don't know, just seems like a lazy way to cast off the earlier games into a separate canon.

