Endgame Official Avengers: Endgame News & Speculation Thread!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Real question: where do people keep up with these "Marks" of the Iron Man suits? Are they detailed in the toy releases or something? I honestly lost count after IM2, though I realize Tony has mentioned Mark-40-something every now and then in the dialogue.

mwdkh05ar8p11.png
It was basically IM3 where Tony went bananas with the suits (from mark 7 to mark 42). After that he went back to 1-2 per movie (+ the hulkbusters)
 
If there is indeed some fast forward in the movie (i.e. 1 year later), I'm guessing he may have built marks 51-84 in that time (like in IM3).
Well that makes sense. But how did the person who made that Tweet know it was Mark 85? Have they released that info somewhere?
 
Well that makes sense. But how did the person who made that Tweet know it was Mark 85? Have they released that info somewhere?

I think it was called that, by the guy who leaked the first blurry image of IM's new suit (a Hot Toys designer). I don't believe it's been officially confirmed though.
 
I think time travel was used well in Days of Future Past and Edge of Tomorrow. The trick here is that it isn't simply a "do over", the time travel mission needs to be dangerous and costly for it to matter. Secondly, you can at most repeat it once, if you screw up again, you're toast. And thirdly, the "substitue" resolution has to be equally interesting, a sort of equivalent exchange, given the big change of status quo we saw at the end of Inifinity War, it would only make sense to have a big change in status quo even if they prevent the snap (be it a real character death, loss or something else).
Please don't get me started on DOFPs minority murder porn fetish. I much prefer the comic book version where people in the past die one by one as they try to accomplish something, instead of playing idiotic death tag with moronic Mystique Sentinels.
 
Edge of Tomorrow's take on time-travel was hella fun. I did not care for DoFP's. In general, "the future is a horrible dystopia, let's prevent it!" stories bore me after the Terminator movies. Endgame doesn't worry me about falling into that particular trap I don't care for because in this case, the awful future they're trying to prevent is, for us, the present. It's not some hypothetical, distant concept where the filmmakers just present things as awful as possible to make a point because they know they won't have to follow through and flesh out that future. We saw this happen, we followed the whole journey that lead to it, and we'll see them dealing with the fallout of it, so that makes those stakes feel a lot more real for us, imo.
 
Edge of Tomorrow's take on time-travel was hella fun. I did not care for DoFP's. In general, "the future is a horrible dystopia, let's prevent it!" stories bore me after the Terminator movies. Endgame doesn't worry me about falling into that particular trap I don't care for because in this case, the awful future they're trying to prevent is, for us, the present. It's not some hypothetical, distant concept where the filmmakers just present things as awful as possible to make a point because they know they won't have to follow through and flesh out that future. We saw this happen, we followed the whole journey that lead to it, and we'll see them dealing with the fallout of it, so that makes those stakes feel a lot more real for us, imo.
8ae.gif
 
He didnt spontaneously morph into another person. He's the same person. It's part of the suspension of disbelief of the stage and cinema.

My point is that it takes me well beyond my limits of suspending my disbelief.
 
Edge of Tomorrow's take on time-travel was hella fun. I did not care for DoFP's. In general, "the future is a horrible dystopia, let's prevent it!" stories bore me after the Terminator movies. Endgame doesn't worry me about falling into that particular trap I don't care for because in this case, the awful future they're trying to prevent is, for us, the present. It's not some hypothetical, distant concept where the filmmakers just present things as awful as possible to make a point because they know they won't have to follow through and flesh out that future. We saw this happen, we followed the whole journey that lead to it, and we'll see them dealing with the fallout of it, so that makes those stakes feel a lot more real for us, imo.
Groundhog Day is always a good way to go.
 
Real question: where do people keep up with these "Marks" of the Iron Man suits? Are they detailed in the toy releases or something? I honestly lost count after IM2, though I realize Tony has mentioned Mark-40-something every now and then in the dialogue.

Marvel's Iron Man 3: The Art of the Movie Slipcase Amazon product
 
Real question: where do people keep up with these "Marks" of the Iron Man suits? Are they detailed in the toy releases or something? I honestly lost count after IM2, though I realize Tony has mentioned Mark-40-something every now and then in the dialogue.


How could you lose count?

Iron Man 2- Ends with the Mark 6

Avengers

"Sir the Mark 7 is not ready for deployment"
"Then skip the spinning rims. We're on the clock"


Iron Man 3-

Alot of dialogue and emphasis that Stark is now on the Mark 42 armor. He worked on 8 to 41 after New York.

Age of Ultron- The armors numbers grow sequentially as the movie progresses

43- Perfected Mark version of the Mark 42 in Iron Man 3
44- Hulkbuster
45- Sokovia battle


Mark XLV = 45

IInp3an.jpg







Captain America Civil War- Mark 46

Spider-man homecoming- Mark 47


Infinity War- Advertised as the Mark 50

Mark 50


We'll probably never see 48 and 49. They did a little jump to reach Infinity war
 
Last edited:
I notice in that billing they used "with Josh Brolin" as opposed to "and." Is there another special guest?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"