ginny_weasley
Geek
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2006
- Messages
- 755
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
taintedFB said:I think you guys are being overly harsh about X3. I saw it twice and liked it more the second time.
And none of its problems are Ratner's fault. It's all the writers. They needed a few more rewrites to find a better way around Jimmy's schedule than the disrespectful way they discard him, remove the silly humor (and all of Juggs' lines), remove the corny dialogue "we stand together, X-men" and bring Scott back at the end. And have his disappearance REALLY IMPACT his teammates.
But the acting, the action, the effects...X3 wasn't bad, it just could have been better with a stronger and smarter script. This screenplay seemed dumbed down, underestimating audience intelligence:
Example:
Let's setup that Xavier wants Storm to lead, then they debate closing the school for 30 seconds, then she steps up. ******ed!
I agree with that critique, with the exception that after two viewings I'm still none too pleased. I think this is still a mediocre flick at best. For me, it was the gutting of the message (both in the Cure and the Phoenix storyline - there was just no meaning IMHO. No Jean self-sacrifice, no Rogue coping with her powers, no resolution for any character).
But that's another issue. On the screenplay: I have to agree with you taintedFB. After the second viewing, the quality was really apparent to me. There were some nice IDEAS for scenes, but that was about it. The characters were constantly saying things uncharacteristic of them (esp Xavier), the terrible one-liners were grating, and entire conversations were just unrealistic (ie that Storm scene you pointed out).