Agreed on all the comments on VA work for both versions--just excellent work all around, especially on Spectacular's sudden foreboding drops in tone, just makes the Green Goblin seem all the more unstable and unpredictable. (And nice to see someone else noticed STAS!Goblin's occasional biting sarcasm.)
The show is kid-friendly; it's just geared toward kids who have seen three increasingly violent movies surrounding this character.
LOL, I forgot about that. Yep, the kids are getting more allowances (YAY! for the older viewers)...
I think thats exactly what Howard Mackie had in mind when he wrote the story. It was only a two part story and the surprise was sprung on us on the last page of Part One. (The Goblin had been attacking Peter's friends and its revealed at the end that it was Peter in the costume, drugged and hypnotized to be the attacker.) Part Two was all about the battle of wills between the captured Peter and Norman as Spidey refuses to take the Goblin Formula. Then the whole "heir" angle of the relationship was dropped from future stories, except for Sins Past.
Hmmm...I think at least in Paul Jenkins' "Death in a Family," they referenced it for continuity's sake--though I admit it's not clearly built upon thematically. That plot boiled down to Norman trying to commit suicide by having Spider-Man finally kill him, thus tainting Peter in the process. And...I think that's it--I don't think there were any other clear indications Norman or Peter picking up that 'heir' angle. Damn. I guess I just had the feeling they continued with it; Norman and Peter's superhero-archenemy conflict has gotten so twisted and messed up that I can still see the 'heir' thing under the surface, though it's never referred to. (The only other thing that comes to mind is a recent Spider-Girl plot, where another of Norman's from-the-grave plans go into motion, and through mad science, a digital copy of his consciousness is download into an older Peter, and Norman 'returns'--though I guess that's REALLY more revenge, than the 'heir' plot again.)
And the whole "We all wear masks" speach sounded so sinister (a word that they wouldn't allow 90's Spider-Man to use but yet 90's X-Men did). I have to admit, initially I hated Green Goblin's TSSM design, but after "The Uncertanty Principle" I grew to love it.
However, all and all both Green Goblin voices are great and I can call both of them in my head whenever I please. However, TSSM's Norman blows TAS's Norman out of the water.
I LOVED Goblin's 'mask' speech--it had a great delivery, great animation, and it sounded kinda meaningful to me, like it said something about superheroes/supervillains in general.
Just focusing on Norman--yeah, TSSM's Norman gets to be more of a badass than TAS's Norman. Calling out the guy who's the only one between you and a long drop to becoming a bright red mess on the pavement? BADASS. (In retrospect, makes me rather think that lil' hostage situation may've given TSSM's Norman his taste for flying...)
Anyone know if the Green Goblin plays a big role (or at least an amusing cameo) in the recent Spider-Man video game, Web of Shadows?