Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]353553[/split]
yeah, cuz you couldn't tell those guys were cg at all.
Yeah, it's easy to see the great disparity between a CG creation like Davey, and Killowog. Granted, ILM had an advantage because they were "painting" over an actual performance, but that was the smart way to do it. In spite of never seeing the actor, his spirit and soul is ingrained to the CG character because a major part of the process involves their participation.Actually, a lot of people honestly believed that Davy Jones was done with practical effects. Can you honestly blame them?
Was the video stuttering? Movements were fine. Extra resolution isn't going to fix how the animation looks. It's great that you like it, but to me I can instantly tell it's much worse than what we've had before.Kilowog looks bad ass and MCD was a great choice to voice him. Get over it already. The visuals from that clip look just fine to me. Are some of you just judging it from a grainy you tube clip or something?
Was the video stuttering? Movements were fine. Extra resolution isn't going to fix how the animation looks. It's great that you like it, but to me I can instantly tell it's much worse than what we've had before.
Actually, a lot of people honestly believed that Davy Jones was done with practical effects. Can you honestly blame them?
Yeah. You can't tell CGI was used for Davy and for Gollum. Sure.....
If I were a lesser person right about now I'd remark on how easy you are to please. Fortunately I'm in a pleasant mood and can only point out that the effects on the CG creatures are just not up to par with what I perceive to be the best the biz has to offer. It's not a matter of nitpicking, it's stating it as it is.Mush worse than what? You haven't seen the whole film yet. That clip looked just fine to me.
Meh, they can't please every nitpicker.