http://reviews.cnet.com/consoles/sony-playstation-vita-2000/4505-10109_7-35827488.htmlDisplay
The Vita Slim retains the 5-inch screen, but Sony has swapped the old Vita's OLED panel, in favour of an LCD one. Initially that raised alarm bells, as OLED panels typically provide stunningly rich colours. Hearing that it had been removed didn't sound like good news.
My fears were quickly allayed however, as the new LCD panel is actually rather good. It doesn't have quite the same deep saturation as its OLED cousin, but I found it to have a slightly warmer, more natural colour tone. I certainly won't say the new Vita's screen looks better -- but it's no worse, just different. The colour tone on the new panel is different, sure, but I had to look at test images and settings menus on both screens at once to tell the difference. When you're in the middle of a game, I almost guarantee you won't find the new Vita's screen lacking in any way.
Both screens share the same 960x544-pixel resolution, which is sufficient to make small text in games or when browsing the Web look sharp and clearly readable. Whacking in a Full HD display of the kind you'd get on Sony's recent Xperia Z1 smart phone might make things look more crisp, but it would also be much more demanding of both the processor and the battery. As it stands, the screen is more than adequate, and is a good compromise for overall performance.
New PS Vita Model Coming to North America
by Colin Moriarty FEBRUARY 10, 2014
SUBMIT TWEET SHARE +1 SHARE
Today, Sony revealed that the new PS Vita Model -- the so-called "Slim" design -- will be coming to North America this Spring. Additionally, a Borderlands 2 bundle will be available upon launch.
Little else is known about the new PS Vita Model when it comes to its North American launch, such as pricing or a specific release date. However, Sony did show-off the Borderlands 2 bundle's box. Presumably, PS Vita Slim will also be available on its own.
Developing...
It came as a surprise to find Borderlands 2s PS Vita iteration at the PlayStation GDC booth, especially because Sony, 2K, and Gearbox have been so mum about it. Running on debug Vita hardware, Borderlands 2 looks the part and is reportedly content complete with some DLC added in -- but its definitely not on the same level as its console and PC counterparts. (It can, however, speak to the PS3 version of the game with Cross-Save.)
In the five minutes or so I spent with the game, running around a couple of areas while gunning down enemies, I was disappointed that Borderlands 2 isnt running better. Its not a major surprise that there are some performance issues PS Vita is powerful, but not as powerful as the PlayStation 3 and I couldnt help but wonder if Sony and the studio responsible for the port, Iron Galaxy, are working on further optimization.
The game ran somewhat sluggishly, held back by a subpar framerate, and it even froze in place a couple of times for a second or two when there wasnt even that much action going on on-screen. In this regard, I hope that Borderlands 2 is further refined before its released to the general public, because the performance issues are noticeable, and I suspect performance will only degrade further when theres heated action going on all around you.
Anything worth noting, though?
Does the Vita TV/PS TV run carts or is it all digital?
Several more reasons not to bother with a Vita. Sony is killing support for several apps in the coming months
http://www.ign.com/articles/2015/01/28/sony-to-end-ps-vita-support-for-maps-near-and-youtube
Hm, if not for the software they are still actively trying to get for the Vita, I would say this is a sign that it's soon to be done. I wonder why they're doing that. If I understand correctly, it's the companies behind the apps who pay for the licensing, not the other way around, right? Unless they are just trying to cut costs via server space? Guess that's possible.
I have no clue but I thought Sony paid the companies license fees to get their apps onboard. I could be wrong but I thought Sony decided to stop paying bc the userbase isnt big enough to justify the costs. To me as someone that doesnt own a Vita, it defintely doesnt look like they are invested