Marvolo
Avenger
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2006
- Messages
- 47,795
- Reaction score
- 10,762
- Points
- 103
I have read DH and I followed its production. Heyman is bluffing with the "no hallows" stuff. There was a lot of trepidation when they made the decision to make it two films and they wanted to make sure that everyone knew it "had to be done".
OoTP is a perfect example of what I am talking about. It is the densest story in the series in terms of the characters and actual plot (DH is a lot of exposition like HBP) and yet was able to be trimmed down even further then it probably should have been. They really wanted it under 2:20, which is why Yates had to edit it down from the near 3 hour version.
The didn't want another Potter film coming in near 3 hours or over, so they made the decision to cut DH in half, but not really in half. Part 2 is barely 2 hours and yet look at all the stuff they left out from the book. Why? Because they trimmed the first film down to a certain length and what was left would not fit into the second film in terms of the narrative. They also still found a way to rush the epilogue.
Don't know if you know this, but OOTP screenplay was done by Michael Goldenberg. Steve Kloves did the rest. It is interesting that Goldenberg was originally courted to write the screenplay for PS and he is a friend of Heyman's, but Goldenberg declined. Kloves stepped down for OOTP, and Heyman once again went to Goldenberg who this time accepted the gig. Now what I find interesting is OOTP is argurably one of if not the best adapted screenplays in the series when you consider the 3 hour cut. From what is known about it it was a hell of an adaption that had loads of important relevant info, and really nailed the story. When you consider the size of the book and to get it to what he did was really good work. Even in its truncated form that was released the screenplay holds up. Also, it lacks any of Kloves little "Kloveisms" that riddle the rest of the screenplays. Kloves wasted time on his Hermione obsession and took the story place it didn't necesarrily need to go. Had Goldenbverg been the one to write the DH screenplay he may have been able to fit it into one film, but Kloves never had a chance. He was too indulgent and enslaved by his own needs rather than what the story ultimately needed. I absolutely agree that the DH was adapted poorly. They front loaded Part 1 and left hardly any story at all for part 2. Even when I watch them back to back it is severely lopsided. So I don't think splitting it intoi 2 partrs is what did the damagew. It was a poorly written and poorly structured screenplay that did the damage.