Savage said:
I loved it but it's definately the weakest of the series. I'd watch any movie for Snipes' fights alone
A lot of it, apparently, was his double Clay Fontanot. It's no secret Snipes hated the direction the third film was going in, and a lot of days, he just didn't want to do anything. There's even a scene from the alternate ending where Blade is supposed to open his eyes after being presumed dead, and they had to CGI the opening of his eyes 'cause Snipes wouldn't do it on set. Yeah, Snipes should have soldiered on for the sake of the film, but Goyer and New Line were clearly sidelining Blade in favor of the Nightstalkers.
and Hannibal King was pretty badass. Abigail was just...there...and...awkward. Stunt double was desperately needed. Too many actors and actresses want to do their own stunts at the cost of quality.
I applaud the effort. Reynolds (ESPECIALLY Reynolds) and Biel got in ridiculous shape to come off believable as vampire hunters, and them wanting to do as much as they could is far more encouraging than seeing simple actions done by stunt people.
As for The film, I pretty much agree with everything most of you have already said. The big things for me of course are the lack of a vampire hierarchy, which has always been a strong fixture in the franchise (and one of the things I love about the television series), the specifics of the Nightstalkers, as the idea of them makes sense based not only on the comics but dialogue from Whistler in the first film. Somerfield, she should have been Karen Jensen. I would have hated to see her die, but one, the re-introduction of her character would have meant more focus on Blade, and two, it fits in with Hannibal being cured. Mind you, I think it would have been interesting to see how Blade handled a full-fledged vampire on his team. It wouldn't be the same as Blade 2 since everyone else would still be human, and they'd be calling the shots. And I definitely agree with the idea that Dracula should have looked a lot different. I would have cast an actor maybe of Middle Eastern or Mediterranean descent. Long hair, a beard, that would have been nice. A full back tattoo of his glyph as opposed to the tiny brand in the center of his chest.
The sad thing is, Trinity was the most expensive of the Blade films, and looked cheaper than Blade 2!!! What's abundantly clear is that Goyer had no business directing the film. The other two films benefitted more from their directors, with Norrington have a visual effects background, and Del Toro being a master of horror and a full-fledged comic book geek. Blade 2 is probably my favorite comic book movie, as opposed to something like X-Men or Batman Begins that are films based on comics, the difference being how they present the story and characters. Blade 2 had a stronger translation of elements in comic book storytelling. The dialogue, the pacing, the action, all more reminiscent of what you'd see in a comic book. The scene wher Nomak uppercuts Blade during their fight at the end, It's like looking at a comic panel, and you can almost see the sound effect lettering. X-men and Batman Begins had standard movie action, but nothing to really remind you of the action you might find in any particular comic. Burton's Batman falls more into that category.