The Original Bamfer
Big, Bald and Beautiful
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2003
- Messages
- 42,637
- Reaction score
- 508
- Points
- 73
Now, I find the irony in this hilarious: Our county is said to be one of the fattest counties in the United States, and our school district has entirely changed our menus to solve this issue (as well as done many other things.) Our school board, however has decided upon cutting all Jr. High sports.
In terms of health and obesity, I do believe this is a wrong turn. Jr. high (In our district, starting at 5th grade) is often when Puberty hits or develops. And kids need to stay healthy to keep up with their hormones and changing bodies. A lot of stress can be found at this age as well. Physical activity is one of the few healthy ways kids really have to relieve stress. Sports give them something to do, as opposed to having more time to turn to drugs and/or alcohol.
And, like anything else, athletes are successful because of their practice. Experience usually makes for a better performance. These few years are vital for athletes when they move on up to High School and the pre-existing team is bound to accept a younger athlete more if they have learned their sport, something, which will be taken away from them if they are cut. Sports, potentially, can invest positive qualities into a teenager, such as responsibility and teamwork.
There have always been sports in Jr. High - the usuals; football, basketball, wrestling, etc. Every sport there acts as a primer for High School Sports. I do not think Budgetary reasons are an acceptable enough reason to rid future-athletes of something so important. Sure, I am a senior that will be done - for good - in five days. So, it doesn't really affect me. But it will a lot of my family as well as people I know. Especially after all fo the drastic changes made recently (No auditorium/theatre in the new school, a more demanding grading scale, cameras & more intense security, etc,) it is slightly offensive.
What do you think?
In terms of health and obesity, I do believe this is a wrong turn. Jr. high (In our district, starting at 5th grade) is often when Puberty hits or develops. And kids need to stay healthy to keep up with their hormones and changing bodies. A lot of stress can be found at this age as well. Physical activity is one of the few healthy ways kids really have to relieve stress. Sports give them something to do, as opposed to having more time to turn to drugs and/or alcohol.
And, like anything else, athletes are successful because of their practice. Experience usually makes for a better performance. These few years are vital for athletes when they move on up to High School and the pre-existing team is bound to accept a younger athlete more if they have learned their sport, something, which will be taken away from them if they are cut. Sports, potentially, can invest positive qualities into a teenager, such as responsibility and teamwork.
There have always been sports in Jr. High - the usuals; football, basketball, wrestling, etc. Every sport there acts as a primer for High School Sports. I do not think Budgetary reasons are an acceptable enough reason to rid future-athletes of something so important. Sure, I am a senior that will be done - for good - in five days. So, it doesn't really affect me. But it will a lot of my family as well as people I know. Especially after all fo the drastic changes made recently (No auditorium/theatre in the new school, a more demanding grading scale, cameras & more intense security, etc,) it is slightly offensive.
What do you think?