• Super Maintenance

    Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.

    Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.

    We apologize for the inconvenience.

Horror Parker Finn's Smile series

a94140fb0eecbf2d8fa35f8d5abf89da2d02584d.jpg
 

 
Last edited:
I just don't see what else you can do with this? Naomi Scott is what made the second movie for me. They are just kind of repeating the same plot over and over again. They had to concoct a character just so Scott's character could understand what is going on and what's happening to her.

A character who wasn't even real.
 
I'm gonna check this out along with the first one since they're both on Paramount+. I was surprised to see it on there since it feels like it just came out in theaters.
 
I'll be back for the spin-off Frown.

1733433257871.jpeg
 
I just don't see what else you can do with this? Naomi Scott is what made the second movie for me. They are just kind of repeating the same plot over and over again. They had to concoct a character just so Scott's character could understand what is going on and what's happening to her.

A character who wasn't even real.

I think their first meeting was real personally. And after the ending of the 2nd movie there will be absolute chaos in the world.
 
Watched the first movie again. I find it more creepy than the sequel as well as eerie. But I think the sequel had a better central character and bigger scope. Both are really good movies and I hope Parker Finn can stick the landing with the 3rd movie.
 
Watched the first movie again. I find it more creepy than the sequel as well as eerie. But I think the sequel had a better central character and bigger scope. Both are really good movies and I hope Parker Finn can stick the landing with the 3rd movie.
Agreed. I watched b2b and there about even in terms of quality, i do feel Naomi Scott's performance with sky was the better protagonist, her trauma was more potent than Rose's so gave that scope as you said. I was humbled by Scott's performance as il be honest i thought she was a one trick pony who wouldn't live up to Susie Bacon...how wrong i was. With a 3rd film on the way, they could go a few ways but the dilemma is the interpersonal stories these films have mainly focused on, thats been the key to this series. I love LOVE the music in this film though.


Edit. Scott actually made a Skye Riley album for the release. Thats quite impressive tbh lol
 
Last edited:
I watched both of these recently. Honestly the first one kinda bored me. The second one, though? Total 180 for me. The opening scene was awesome and the story that followed was way more interesting to me. I also thought Naomi Scott was a much better lead, no offense to Sosie Bacon.
 
How long before they exhaust the premise? I think 2 did a decent job trying to keep it fresh.
 
I watched both of these recently. Honestly the first one kinda bored me. The second one, though? Total 180 for me. The opening scene was awesome and the story that followed was way more interesting to me. I also thought Naomi Scott was a much better lead, no offense to Sosie Bacon.
The first one was awful imo and it’s holding me back from watching the sequel. Sounds like I have to see it now.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"