Passion of the Christ sequel

[Dynasty]

Well not really but kinda

http://www.cinematical.com/2006/06/08/passion-of-the-christ-ii-sort-of/


sounds horrible since i hated the POTC (Passion of the Chrsit, not Pirates of the Caribbean)

 

[GoldGoblin]

Could be good.

 

[AlteredEgo]

hmmm, good point. just to play the devil's advocate here though, im gonna say that it could also not be good.

 

[Joker]

the passion was a snuff film with no money shot that was hugely anti-jew, and this is an unnessecary sequel to it...yeah, sounds real f**kin great

 

[Mee]

Like the Goblin said, it could be good. I thought POTC was decent, there should've been a little less blood and gore and a little more story, and definately a longer ressurection scene at the end, but it was alright. It showed people something they haven't seen before. The Bible describes Jesus' torture even worse than what was shown in the movie, and no movie before POTC came close to showing you what Jesus went through for our sins. But anyway enough ranting...

I would like it to be in english like was mentioned in the article, I find reading subtitles for 2 hours rather annoying. Could be good, could just be another generic Jesus movie, we'll have to wait and see.

 

[huskerwebhead]

Passion of the Christ 2: Crucify This

http://www.spikedhumor.com/articles/12633/Family_Guy_Passion_Of_The_Christ_2.html

 

[Wilhelm-Scream]

I thought POTC was decent,

Yeah, but this new one with the octopus-faced guy and the hammerhead shark headed guy looks way more exciting.

 

[Dope Nose]

boy, Hollywood keeps resurrecting old ideas huh?

 

[Mee]

Yeah, but this new one with the octopus-faced guy and the hammerhead shark headed guy looks way more exciting.

Oh you're a clever one.

 

[U.S War Machine]

I dunno if it wants to talk about his ressurection it's not a very long story. Mainly just talks to his apostles and goes up to heaven in a cloud.

 

[Motown Marvel]

sigh....

 

[The Dark Defender]

the passion was a snuff film with no money shot that was hugely anti-jew, and this is an unnessecary sequel to it...yeah, sounds real f**kin great

A snuff film is a film that's meant to provide gratification through violence, anyone that thinks that's why TPOTC was made is an idiot, blind as a bat, or both; and it was not anti-semetic in the least...of course I'm accustomed to inane, circular bashing from this films detractors, since it's been 2 years now and they're still regurgitating the same tired bull**** that was countered...2 years ago.

And no, it should not have been "more story," since it was exactly the story it told you it was going to be long before the film was ever released, and if you wanted a different one, you shouldn't have watched.

You might as well ***** about Jurassic Park having dinosaurs in it, King Kong having a giant simian in it, and Alien having an Alien in it; since those are about as intelligent and valid of criticisms as The Passion being too much about The Passion.

 

[Wilhelm-Scream]

boo hoo

I see your type is still regurgitating the same tired bulls*** from 2 years ago as well. Good job.

 

[Mee]

And no, it should not have been "more story," since it was exactly the story it told you it was going to be long before the film was ever released, and if you wanted a different one, you shouldn't have watched.

You might as well ***** about Jurassic Park having dinosaurs in it, King Kong having a giant simian in it, and Alien having an Alien in it; since those are about as intelligent and valid of criticisms as The Passion being too much about The Passion.

Um...what? I didn't say they shouldn't have shown any gore and torture, but like there was at least 20 minutes of just the whipping scene. There could've been more story in the begining leading up to the garden, and there should've been more with the ressurection. Not that I don't know the story, but it would've made it a better movie.

 

[The Dark Defender]

Um...what? I didn't say they shouldn't have shown any gore and torture, but like there was at least 20 minutes of just the whipping scene. There could've been more story in the begining leading up to the garden, and there should've been more with the ressurection. Not that I don't know the story, but it would've made it a better movie.

I wasn't talking specifically to you, I was speaking of the detractors of the film in general; and the scourging scene ie less than 10 minutes actually; yes it drawn out, but it was that way for a reason. It's not glossing over what he went through, it's capturing the full impact of it(or pretty damn close), hence the point of the film.

The story leading up to the garden has been told numerous times in numerous films, that's why this movie was made, the story it tells hasn't been(not effectively anyway).

 

[The Dark Defender]

boo hoo

Actually, that sums up your side of the argument(very compelling argument by the way, about as intelligent as most of the **** you post. Too bad your brain isn't nearly the size of your ego).

I see your type is still regurgitating the same tired bulls*** from 2 years ago as well. Good job.

No, my type is still regurgitating the same counters to the same lame argument that your type has been regurgitating for two years, even though it's already been countered countless times. No new counter is necessary when you can't muster up a single new point.

 

[tzarinna]

Alright

 

[Mee]

I wasn't talking specifically to you, I was speaking of the detractors of the film in general; and the scourging scene ie less than 10 minutes actually; yes it drawn out, but it was that way for a reason. It's not glossing over what he went through, it's capturing the full impact of it(or pretty damn close), hence the point of the film.

The story leading up to the garden has been told numerous times in numerous films, that's why this movie was made, the story it tells hasn't been(not effectively anyway).

Good points. Like I said it was a decent movie, but could've been better.

Was that scene really just 10 minutes? Seemed alot longer.

 

[Wilhelm-Scream]

No, my type is still regurgitating the same counters to the same lame argument that your type has been regurgitating for two years, even though it's already been countered countless times.

mmm...yeah, my...point exactly, so you've become that which you despise.

Also, do you actually KNOW what my "same lame" argument has been about the film? I may be wrong, but I'd wager you don't know and are lumping me in with everyone else.

 

[The Dark Defender]

mmm...yeah, my...point exactly

That'd be tough, since you rarely have one.

So you've become what you despise.

I don't despise effective counters to lame arguments.

Also, do you actually KNOW what my "same lame" argument has been about the film? I may be wrong, but I'd wager you don't know and are lumping me in with everyone else.

No, I actually know exactly what it is, since you're one of the ones that repeated that lame argument numerous times; as I know because I've you seen you specifically do it in threads that I've engaged in since the release of the film.

 

[The Dark Defender]

Good points. Like I said it was a decent movie, but could've been better.

For what it intended to achieve, it was perfect; and the fact that Gibson made the film the way it was knowing he'd get this type of response from people and still telling the exact story he wanted to tell, exactly how he wanted to tell it in every way is a huge part of why I respect him as a filmmaker and the film itself so much.

Was that scene really just 10 minutes? Seemed alot longer.

It seemed longer because it's extremely visceral, and it you get the feeling it's never going to end while watching it, sort of like how he felt while recieving it.

 

[Wilhelm-Scream]

No, I actually know exactly what it is, since you're one of the ones that repeated that lame argument numerous times; as I know because I've you seen you specifically do it in threads that I've engaged in.

Oh, then I was wrong. Anyway, you might want to power-down the rage-boosters there, sport. You sound inordinately venomous and hurt over a stupid f***ing movie and your disgust for people that have either misinterpreted the film (in your estimation) or who are simply vocal about their dislike of the movie has got you saying ridiculous things, things that are completely untrue.

 

[The Dark Defender]

Oh, then I was wrong. Anyway, you might want to power-down the rage-boosters there, sport. You sound inordinately venomous and hurt over a stupid f***ing movie and your disgust for people that have either misinterpreted the film (in your estimation) or who are simply vocal about their dislike of the movie has got you saying ridiculous things, things that are completely untrue.

I'm not in a rage, nor was I hurt. I simply call things as I see them.

If I see someone that was just told "don't put your hand on that stove, it's very hot" proceed to put their hand right on top of that stove, then complain that they got burnt, I just saw blatant stupidity and incompetence, and that's what I'll call.

If I see someone ***** to no end because The Passion of the Christ was too much about The Passion of the Christ, I'm seeing the exact same thing.

If I wanted to say ridiculous things that are completely untrue, I would just jump ship over to the side of the argument that people like you stand on.

 

[Isildur´s Heir]

They already have a title for the movie, and it´s not The Resurrection

Passion of the Christ II: Payback´s a b**ch

Starring Steven Seagal as JC and Pamela Anderson as Mary Magdalene

 

[Wilhelm-Scream]

If I wanted to say ridiculous things that are completely untrue, I would just jump ship over to the side of the argument that people like you stand on.

The side that says Mel Gibson used too much slo-mo and directed it like an Mtv music video which was inapporpriate? and that, while he obviously set out to graphically depict Jesus' suffering, that in itself was a poor choice?
mmkay.