I'd be patient. Yes, every network and studio is trying to do their own streaming service, and yes, this means either spending a ton of money or picking and choosing services. However, a world where customers get to pick and choose is a *good* one. All you need is a willingness to accept that, just because a service has a show of interest, doesn't mean you have to subscribe. You can, instead, just watch *other* things on a service you do get.
And, since the proliferation is fundamentally unstable, some years down the road there should be an implosion, and we'll be back to a reasonable number of services anyway. After all, it does no good for a network to make their own streaming service, and get all the profits, if nobody subscribes because even $5 a month is still too much for "NBC Unlimited" or whatnot. Eventually, only the handful of meaningfully valuable services will survive, and everyone else will just put their content back up on one of them ( or perhaps some new "joint owned, lets not sell out to a giant" service ).
( Oh, who do I think will survive? Netflix, because they were first and biggest and can make it through the lean years. Amazon Prime, because its attached to Amazon and they won't want to abandon their foothold. Disney+, because Disney has insane content archives. Whatever WB eventually calls their thing, likewise. Everyone else dies, including Hulu, unless Hulu ends up getting turned into the aforementioned "everybody but the giants" combined service. )
