The Valeyard
Civilian
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2013
- Messages
- 373
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
This deserves its own thread to set the record straight and discuss this decision. Here we go:
We haven't had any of those conversations other than to say, what characters are we allowed to use this year and advocate or request certain ones that are of interest to us. And every now and then, they'll say, 'You can't have that guy.' They don't say why, and we figure out why later on.
Link
Many of this knew this for a long while. The CW and the WB Features Division are basically completely separate entities. It would be almost impossible to tie the CW series into the feature film universe. This means we'll eventually get new versions of Oliver Queen, Dinah Lance, Barry Allen, Amanda Waller, Deathstroke etc on the big screen.
What are your thoughts on this? Personally, while I understand the logic of the decision, it seems like a big waste. "Arrow" is a fun ride, but it feels almost inconsequential and pointless if it's going to be replaced by a big screen version like "Smallville" was.
We haven't had any of those conversations other than to say, what characters are we allowed to use this year and advocate or request certain ones that are of interest to us. And every now and then, they'll say, 'You can't have that guy.' They don't say why, and we figure out why later on.
Link
Many of this knew this for a long while. The CW and the WB Features Division are basically completely separate entities. It would be almost impossible to tie the CW series into the feature film universe. This means we'll eventually get new versions of Oliver Queen, Dinah Lance, Barry Allen, Amanda Waller, Deathstroke etc on the big screen.
What are your thoughts on this? Personally, while I understand the logic of the decision, it seems like a big waste. "Arrow" is a fun ride, but it feels almost inconsequential and pointless if it's going to be replaced by a big screen version like "Smallville" was.