Rambo IV: In The Serpent's Eye

TrailerCues

Sidekick
Joined
Jul 10, 2006
Messages
2,536
Reaction score
0
Points
31
According to Production Weekly, Sylvester Stallone will reprise the role of Vietnam vet John Rambo in a fourth "Rambo" film.

The site says that Stallone is set to produce and direct the sequel based on his own script titled Rambo IV: In the Serpent's Eye. Production is tentatively scheduled for January in Thailand.

The next chapter finds Rambo recruited by a group of Christian human rights missionaries to protect them against pirates, during a humanitarian aid deliver to the persecuted Karen people of Burma. After some of the missionaries are taken prisoner by sadistic Burmese soldiers, Rambo gets a second impossible job: to assemble a team of mercenaries to rescue the surviving relief workers.

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=16857
 
There are so many obvious jokes here that they don't even require typing.

I hope this movie has some substance. Rambo: First Blood Part II and Rambo III are possibly the emptiest, most basic movies I've ever seen. Even for 1980's action movies.
 
and they were still good.

can't wait to see if this happens..

stallone better be growing his hair!
 
ROBOCOP CPU001 said:
and they were still good.

Not really. Rambo is a great character and Stallone always performed him well. First Blood is a good movie. The sequels are passable.
 
making them good.

these are some of the few action movies where you don't really care if the storys are lacking..you like them from the start..and you enjoy them..which is always a good thing.
 
Kevin Roegele said:
LOL, passable does not mean good, it means adequate, exceptable.


They were still good no matter how you wish to word it.
 
So they changed the story again?
 
The first two were good movies. The third one was crap.

In the Serpent's Eye????? Are you kidding me?? That is the dumbest subtitle I have ever heard.

No Richard Crenna and no Jerry Goldsmith. I think this one will fail worse than Rocky Balboa.
 
I sense trouble ....

Since when did Rambo need to 'assemble' a gang to save the day??

He is a one man army .... get him doing what he does best and this could be cool.
 
Kevin Roegele said:
There are so many obvious jokes here that they don't even require typing.

I hope this movie has some substance. Rambo: First Blood Part II and Rambo III are possibly the emptiest, most basic movies I've ever seen. Even for 1980's action movies.

Kevin I honestly gotta say I am surprised to see the above statement from you (Knowing that you like cool stuff like Ultimate Warrior and comicbooks).

While Il agree that Rambo III is a pile of poo, Rambo First Blood part 2 is rightly regarded by action film aficionados as the Martin Scorsese of action flicks. The film is straight up frikkin awesome.
So it is a bit of a head scratcher to see you saying it sucks.
 
SolidSnakeMGS said:
The first two were good movies. The third one was crap.

In the Serpent's Eye????? Are you kidding me?? That is the dumbest subtitle I have ever heard.

No Richard Crenna and no Jerry Goldsmith. I think this one will fail worse than Rocky Balboa.


Don be Noob.

RB is going to be a massive success, there's no doubt about that.
And I think that a new Rambo film will do amazing too at the box office in these terrorist dangerous times we live in, think about it.

If you think RB ain't gonna do anything but great business at Christmas then you need to think again bub.
 
The title is so 80's DTV,i love it!!!:woot:
 
TrailerCues said:
According to Production Weekly, Sylvester Stallone will reprise the role of Vietnam vet John Rambo in a fourth "Rambo" film.

The site says that Stallone is set to produce and direct the sequel based on his own script titled Rambo IV: In the Serpent's Eye. Production is tentatively scheduled for January in Thailand.

The next chapter finds Rambo recruited by a group of Christian human rights missionaries to protect them against pirates, during a humanitarian aid deliver to the persecuted Karen people of Burma. After some of the missionaries are taken prisoner by sadistic Burmese soldiers, Rambo gets a second impossible job: to assemble a team of mercenaries to rescue the surviving relief workers.

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=16857
No good can come of this...
"In the Serpent's Eye" sounds like the title of a Conan the Barbarian story.
 
Dangerous said:
Don be Noob.

:huh:

RB is going to be a massive success, there's no doubt about that.
And I think that a new Rambo film will do amazing too at the box office in these terrorist dangerous times we live in, think about it.

There is doubt about that. I don't mean financial success necessarily either. Oh sure, it'll bring in the crowds, but if it isn't any good -- and I have yet to see a sign showing otherwise -- it will flop like a dead fish.

Rambo. That's a different story entirely. Please explain why you think it will bring in the crowds and what living in "terrorist dangerous times" has to do with anything (or explain what that even means :woot: ).

If you think RB ain't gonna do anything but great business at Christmas then you need to think again bub.

I own and am a fan of Rocky I, II, and IV, as well as Rambo I and II, but fortunately for myself I do not let that love blind me from being objective and considering the likely possibility that future entries in these dead franchises will be just as bad as the entry (or entries, in Rocky's case) preceeding them. Rocky and Rambo both ended on very bad movies, and if any good movies were left in them, we'd seen them by now.

Yes, I tend to be pessimisitic towards certain movies. So far, I do not like anything I have heard about either project. I will certainly see them, but my initial rough assessment is very negative.
 
Kevin Roegele said:
Not really. Rambo is a great character and Stallone always performed him well. First Blood is a good movie. The sequels are passable.

The sequels were two of the most entertaining films of the time and still hold up quite well, and emptier movies are released every month, alot of them are nominated for that sham of an "award" known as the oscar.
 
ROBOCOP CPU001 said:
They were still good no matter how you wish to word it.

They weren't good, that's how I'm wording it. :)
 
Stormyprecious said:
The sequels were two of the most entertaining films of the time and still hold up quite well, and emptier movies are released every month, alot of them are nominated for that sham of an "award" known as the oscar.

Well, they don't give Oscars for entertainment, they give them for achievements in the technical and artistic creation of film. I think Stallone gave a genuinely great performance in First Blood, especially his speech at the end when he is caught.
 
Kevin Roegele said:
Well, they don't give Oscars for entertainment, they give them for achievements in the technical and artistic creation of film. I think Stallone gave a genuinely great performance in First Blood, especially his speech at the end when he is caught.

I'm aware, and there are usually vastly superior achievements to the ones that they give that little statue to.
The committee is very biased toward a certain type of film, mainly tedious pretentious ones.
 
Rambo, and Stallone in general, has always sucked, and will always suck. Rocky Balboa looks awful (I mean for gods sake, he had brain damage and could barely talk in the last one, how the hell is he gonna make a comeback from that???"), and this sounds horrible as well.
 
Is Paulie gracing us with a CGI post-humous appearance?

[Paulie] Ya can't make a champ Rocky. Ya born with it. It's in the eyes. I took ya to the top kid, and I stuck with ya during the hard times. Even death didn't stop me! Go get 'em champ!! [/Paulie]

Because, yeah, if I don't get that, there's no way I'm letting Stallone take any of my funds. I didn't see 'Driven' until it recently appeared on TNT, and on viewing it, I was throughly satisfied with the fact that I had opted to neglect a theater session.

Perhaps this film will have moderate success and catapault Stallone to the top one final time. Maybe not. Either way, Stallone's career is over, and he should rest on his laurels.

Ha, ha, I just mentioned Stallone and laurels in the same sentence; in some self-elusive way, that is oxy-moronic.
 
I straight up hate most of your opinions, I hope most of you get nowhere near the making of an actual film.
 
Gammy79 said:
I straight up hate most of your opinions, I hope most of you get nowhere near the making of an actual film.

If it's any consolation, I hope you never put your mouse arrow close to a 'submit reply' feature. . .ever again.

Gammy79 said:
I straight up
. . . hahahahahaha.
 
MulligaN Stew said:
If it's any consolation, I hope you never put your mouse arrow close to a 'submit reply' feature. . .ever again.

It didn't work, sorry :(
(Also, I don't use a mouse, I use the pad thing that comes with most laptops, OMG!)

MulligaN Stew said:
. . . hahahahahaha.

Yeah, I meant to type "outright hate", I guess I was thinking of Paula Abdul.
Sorry, tiger!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,162
Messages
21,908,109
Members
45,703
Latest member
BMD
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"