This is close to the worst Superman movie ranking I've ever seen. The only way it could have been worse is if Superman II and IV switched places. Who rates STM lower than III and IV? Honestly. And judging a superhero movie based on whether there's a supervillain fight is pretty shallow in my eyes. In the comics, Superman didn't have a steady superpowered nemesis that he could actually fight for the first ten to fifteen years of his existence. It's not like he could get into knock-down, drag-out fights with Mr. Mxyzptlk, Lex Luthor, or Toyman. I just don't understand this belief that superhero movies have to have fight scenes in order to be entertaining. Superheroes do more than fight. This is the worst. It's like they were ranked by age alone, where the oldest is the worst and the newest is the best. I didn't respond at first because I thought it was a joke, but now I'm starting to wonder..