Vid Electricz
Sidekick
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2010
- Messages
- 2,845
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Contradicting yourself already? I thought you said it failed in distancing itself from the other Spider-Man movies?![]()
Here's to reading and comprehension (or lack thereof)! Take a look at my post on the matter again. No contradictions.
(to repeat myself)
1. All the unecessary, alterations to the Spidey universe did not, it fact, improve the film.
2. Having no qualms with the suit from TASM, I was baffled as to why the extreme regression back to referencing the Raimi films costume in TASM2 after they went so far out of their way to distance themselves in TASM.
I really can't be any more succinct.
*sigh* let me re-post my last response to this issue:
Originally Posted by JOE

Describe "with little success". TASM was very successful in distancing itself from Raimi's Spider-Man.
Just like Batman and Robin was very successful at distancing itself from the Burton films (harsh example, sorry). Just because it's "different" doesn't guarantee a favorable result.
Meaning they waaaay went out of their way to differentiate themseleves from the original series by changing things unnecessarily (Ben's death, no wrestling) while adding new elements (Oscorp as a shadowy, evil conglomeration, Peter's parents) that ultimately did nothing for the story.
For all it's changes, TASM was a lukewarm, pieced together movie.
Edit: If TASM did such a good job sitancing itself, why are they right back in bed with the original series, copying the Raimi suit almost to a tee?
Last edited:

, etc...), don't re-tread elements of the old series -sadly, this costume derivation speaks volumes and is perfectly in line with many of Webb's other dubious "creative" choices.