Resistance: The Fall of Man (threads Merged)

What do you think Resistance will score?

  • 1/10

  • 2/10

  • 3/10

  • 4/10

  • 5/10

  • 6/10

  • 7/10

  • 8/10

  • 9/10

  • 10/10

  • 1/10

  • 2/10

  • 3/10

  • 4/10

  • 5/10

  • 6/10

  • 7/10

  • 8/10

  • 9/10

  • 10/10


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
doom3_2.jpg


3_2.jpg


shot05.jpg


DOOM3 loooks much better and they had a crap restrictive engine.
 
Avalanche said:
I actually don't think the second one looks better, if that's what you're implying.

Further, the Resistance shot is close up.


  1. IF YOU CAN'T SEE THE OBVIOUS DIFFERENCE IN DETAIL AND TEXTURE LEVELS, YOU NEED HELP. :dry:
  2. IF ANYTHING, "UP CLOSE" DETAIL SHOULD BE MORE PRONOUNCED, IN AN HD IMAGE......NOT COMPLETELY MISSING.
  3. IF IT LOOKS THIS BAD "UP CLOSE" IN A SCREEN SHOT SMALLER THAN MY 14" MONITOR.......HOW DO YOU THINK IT'S GOING TO LOOK BLOWN UP ON MY 55" T.V.? :rolleyes:
 
Avalanche said:
I actually don't think the second one looks better, if that's what you're implying.

Further, the Resistance shot is close up.

I meant to highlight the level of detail on the two creatures. If your answer is anything other than the fact that the Hell Knight from Doom III simply looks much better, then God help you. :dry:
 
I should send Blas 10 Pm's each more confusing than the last.
 
Fenrir said:
I meant to highlight the level of detail on the two creatures. If your answer is anything other than the fact that the Hell Knight from Doom III simply looks much better, then God help you. :dry:
I think the size has something to do with that. If the shot you posted were as close up as the Resistance shot you posted, the detail would look less pronounced.
 
Looking at the shots you posted, for all the criticism thrown at Resistance, it still looks better. Those Doom shots were shabby. Far shabbier than the Resistance ever have been.

This is hardly a convincing Doom looks better argument:

shot05.jpg
 
Avalanche said:
Looking at the shots you posted, for all the criticism thrown at Resistance, it still looks better. Those Doom shots were shabby. Far shabbier than the Resistance ever have been.

This is hardly a convincing Doom looks better argument:

shot05.jpg

For one it has ambient lighting. Something RESISTANCE totally lacks.

I posted that as an example of the quality model work in DOOM3. There is no low poly excuses in him nor is there any 'texture bending' because the programmers are too lazy to do proper model work.
 
Avalanche said:
I think the size has something to do with that. If the shot you posted were as close up as the Resistance shot you posted, the detail would look less pronounced.



doom32el5.jpg



THERE......IT'S SCALED UP TO AN IDENTICAL SIZE. IF YOU STILL THINK THE "SIZE" OR THE FACT THAT THE 'RESISTENCE' SHOT IS "UP CLOSE" HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE CRAPTACULAR QUALITY OF THOSE CHARACTER MODELS, YOU SIMPLY AREN'T SMART ENOUGH TO HAVE THIS CONVERSATION.
 
Avalanche said:
I think the size has something to do with that. If the shot you posted were as close up as the Resistance shot you posted, the detail would look less pronounced.

doom3.jpg


resistance-fall-of-man-20060914004803238.jpg


Yup, size definitely had something to do with that. Now we have a closeups of both the Hell Knight and the Chimera and voila! Suddenly the details in the Resistance model looks better! No wait...it doesn't. :dry:
 
THWIP* said:
THERE......IT'S SCALED UP TO AN IDENTICAL SIZE. IF YOU STILL THINK THE "SIZE" OR THE FACT THAT THE 'RESISTENCE' SHOT IS "UP CLOSE" HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE CRAPTACULAR QUALITY OF THOSE CHARACTER MODELS, YOU SIMPLY AREN'T SMART ENOUGH TO HAVE THIS CONVERSATION.
I'm not saying it looks bad. I just don't agree that the model is as spectacularly superior as people are implying here.

And don't bring smarts into this.
 
Avalanche said:
I'm not saying it looks bad. I just don't agree that the model is as spectacularly superior as people are implying here.

But it is superior. That's quite a compliment considering the game is more than 2 freakin' years old now.
 
Avalanche said:
I'm not saying it looks bad. I just don't agree that the model is as spectacularly superior as people are implying here.

And don't bring smarts into this.


YOU MUST ALSO THINK THE SUN IS SMALLER THAN THE EARTH. :(


YOU'RE RIGHT, MY BAD.......... THAT REALLY WASN'T FAIR TO YOU. :o
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,348
Messages
22,089,897
Members
45,886
Latest member
Elchido
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"