The Amazing Spider-Man 2 Rotten Tomatoes score? - Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm starting to think that is what Sony is going for with this one. Make a spectacle of a film that doesn't need critical aclaim becasue it is just a big fun movie that charms the audience.

Webb even said something about channeling his "inner Bay" with this one and they hired the writers from Transformers.

We'll see if they succeed.
Wow!
 
yeah transformer is a exception. Iron man 3 made a lot because of avengers and iron man 1 and 2. Dark knight rises made a lot because of batman begins. What movie has done great after having a bad 1st one in the siers. Even transformers 1 I think got good reviews.

By the GA only. The critics gave it a rotten. No TF movie has been fresh on RT.
 
Reversing the trend! 61%!

88705.png
:o
 
Another positive review added!

"
A lavish big-screen spectacle to be proud of, an entry in the Marvel canon that comes thrillingly close to matching the spirit and sentiment found in Raimi's original trilogy."

Only 30 more to go to hit 70 again!
 
I don't know if any one fells this way but it semed like up intill a few days ago when the score I think was like 73 or so that a lot of the possitve reviews sounded more mixed leadely toward negative and now the last few days it semeds like the opisite has happened that we are getting reviews that sound possitve and are negitve instead. The last one was 2.5 out of 4 thought it would be possitve but no negitve.
 
man top crits are only 35 7 fresh and 13 negitve with average score of 5.8 does any one think that top crits will get back to 50?
 
oh I don't know I think we have gotten like 30 reviews today that is a good amount.
 
I think a point was made earlier than the TF movies are exceptions. They are movies that the GA enjoys but few people would actually consider "well made".

There are other exceptions as well:

Alice in Wonderland (2010): $1,025,467,110 (RT 51%)

Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides: $1,045,713,802 (RT 33%)


Sometimes people just like watching garbage.
 
Having just seen the movie, 59%-60% feels like the right score for this film. A fine line between rotten and fresh.
 
Why can't they add reviews quickly ?

I believe reviewers/publications add their reviews, ratings and blurbs so it's on their timetable not RTs. Since people tend to read reviews more the closer it is to a release date reviewers like to hold off publishing until the Wed-Fri of release week.
 
There are other exceptions as well:

Alice in Wonderland (2010): $1,025,467,110 (RT 51%)

Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides: $1,045,713,802 (RT 33%)


Sometimes people just like watching garbage.

It seems like most of the movies that had made a billion dollars, had simply just made that much money because they were good to look at.
 
It seems like most of the movies that had made a billion dollars, had simply just made that much money because they were good to look at.

But it's not as simply as that. If all movies needed to hit one billion was to look good, then the movie studios would pour all their money on CGI and much less on screenplay writers and directors.
 
Metacritic:

ASM 2 - 53 after 33 reviews
ASM 1 - 66 after 42 reviews
SM 3 - 59 after 40 reviews
 
This coming down to lower than SM3 is depressing! Seeing the film tonight finally, US premiere and it feels like everyone has just come and gone for weeks now. I guess cause they have.
 
I saw the film two weeks ago and whilst it's not that bad for it to be even close to the score SM3 got is frankly absurd. It's a 6/10 movie but it's not awful.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,398
Messages
22,097,298
Members
45,893
Latest member
DooskiPack
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"