Same scenes this time around?

DA Harvey Dent

Civilian
Joined
Jun 16, 2005
Messages
694
Reaction score
0
Points
11
Do you think Raimi is gonna keep his trend and show the repeated same scenes in SM3?

- PP/Spidey going into a burning building to rescue someone
- PP/Spidey screaming to stop an unstoppable force
- Shot of spidey with 1/2 his mask torn away after a fight
- Shot of Spidey swinging in and landing in the top ceiling corner
of a room
- MJ falling down and an upskirt
- Running shirt rip to reveal the costume
- and many others
 
I think him landing a corner, MJ in danger (though it annoys me), and Peter screaming to stop something heavy and tearing his costume are GIVENS.

Most of these are nitpicks. I think they'll avoid the burning building. It was purposely meant to be a parallel in 2, but even so it was annoyingly redundant, I hope we don't get a third where he lets a kid burn or something then.
 
Yeah man, there are way too many redundant scenes. It would be nice to have different scenes. But if Raimi insists on keeping the same scenes, at least change the shots up so we get different angles.

LOL, on the preview just now on Fox, Raimi said, "you can't rely on something we've seen before"

WHAT? sure Sam.
 
DA Harvey Dent said:
Do you think Raimi is gonna keep his trend and show the repeated same scenes in SM3?

- PP/Spidey going into a burning building to rescue someone
- PP/Spidey screaming to stop an unstoppable force
- Shot of spidey with 1/2 his mask torn away after a fight
- Shot of Spidey swinging in and landing in the top ceiling corner
of a room
- MJ falling down and an upskirt
- Running shirt rip to reveal the costume
- and many others

Im sure well get all of those in some way or another....again.
 
There's a train scene in 3. I think Spidey saves a kid during a Sandman fight,on the set at a train station they had set up huge industrial fans and sand,a baby stroller, a butt load of spectators and I think Dunst was a part of that. It was a bit of a cluster ****.
 
Well I dunno about you guys, but I'm actually looking forward to MJ getting pushed and...well, mostly her upskirt shot :D
 
We know from trailers that all that is true but the burning building is a rumour that could show the symbiotes weakness to fire
 
Asteroid-Man said:
We know from trailers that all that is true but the burning building is a rumour that could show the symbiotes weakness to fire
its possible.
 
So we have another hallucination of Norman to Harry.
 
I would just love to see one of you guys helm a $250 million dollar summer sequel.
 
If they wouldn't release a new trailer every few months then we should be fine. It's not even 2007 yet,and already we've had 2 trailers and tons of new posters. As much as I love to see that and hate the waiting,I'd rather they try and keep most of the scenes and such under raps untill at least,early next year.
 
I wonder if the construction site will go up in flames when there fighting.A bunch of wood frames could easily catch on fire.
 
spidered7 said:
I would just love to see one of you guys helm a $250 million dollar summer sequel.

What is up your ass? No one is complaining we're only making observations. :whatever:
 
I dont mind repeated scenes but for gods sake change the music! The recycled music in the burning building scene almost ruined the scene for me
 
I think we can count on MJ not wearing bras :p
 
Kanon said:
I think we can count on MJ not wearing bras :p

Ya complaining? :p
dunststoryth.jpg
 
Stevens25 said:
If they wouldn't release a new trailer every few months then we should be fine. It's not even 2007 yet,and already we've had 2 trailers and tons of new posters. As much as I love to see that and hate the waiting,I'd rather they try and keep most of the scenes and such under raps untill at least,early next year.
Ever heard of WILL-POWER, get your ass out of forums dedicated to the movie and stop scrapping for every single tidbit, and you won't see most of this stuff? Stop blaming the studios for what you choose willingly to see, blame yourself.:o
 
tzarinna said:
So we have another hallucination of Norman to Harry.

Um...that was in the comics. So, can't be faithful now to the comics? :whatever:
 
I'm not complaining. WTF did you read the original post?
He asked what similar things we're getting in the movie as in the past ones. :cmad:
 
I think most of the scenes everyone says are "repeats" that were in Spider-Man 2 were more like nods to the first movie.
 
Spider-Grrl1516 said:
I think most of the scenes everyone says are "repeats" that were in Spider-Man 2 were more like nods to the first movie.

I guess you can make that argument.
 
And Sam Raimi said in an interveiw before Spider-Man 2 came out that there were going to be several nods to the first movie in it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"