Not every Bat-villain needs to be scarred/burned.
When did he say that? And can someone get me a big nice res pic of that dude with the clown mask on cuz I cant find it, thanksNolan said himself he wouldn't be killing the villains in his movies.
Oh, well im not gonna go on a quest to find itLook for it. He said something along the lines of he won't be making the same mistakes as the first movies by killing the villains.
Yeah, I think the two villains (or three, but that might be too much) should have one big fight at the end with batman, kinda like SM3 but way betterI don't think he'll look any different, but it'd be a shame if we never see his face. Hopefully we get to see him unmasked at first before he dons it for the rest of his role in the film.
He should name the horse. What should be the horse's name. Mister Ed?
If they want to bring Liam Neeson back as Ra's Al Ghul more power too him. He looked the perfect part and acted it superbly. Even as I watched the movie the first time with my friends I leaned over and said "Ducard looks more like Ra's Al Ghul than Ra's Al Ghul does." I had a feeling of satisfaction at the end of the movie. haha.
But would a re-appearance of Ra's bring with it the StoryArc of the Lazarus Pits? and perhaps Bruce/Batman's relationship with Talia? And Ra's still trying to force Bruce into becoming his replacement? Perhaps again leading into a Nolan-ized Bane who would rock as a true Villian.
That mask is sick![]()
![]()
and here's an outfit to match
Nolan said himself he wouldn't be killing the villains in his movies.
![]()
![]()
and here's an outfit to match
When I see a villain return from an offscreen death. I'm guessing the reason why they didn't show Ra's directly being killed was because it would be too gory.When will people learn that offscreen 'deaths' doesn't mean they died?![]()