House_of_El
Defender of Krypton
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2006
- Messages
- 169
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
What would you think of a remake of the classic film starring Al Pacino? Who would you cast? Who would you want to direct? Discuss!
I think Scarface is a very flat character, poorley written, I am not the biggest fan of the movie to begin with, and I think a remake made solely because of how popular the character has got, would make him even more flatter than he already is
I think it was somewhat intended for Tony to be flat--sort-of akin to the Shakesphere-ian tragedy sense.
Tony Montana's only wish in life was to gain wealth and power and all the great things that come with it, but because he did so in illegal ways, thie things he wanted turned their back on him before his life was ended violently.
To me, the movie was an exploration to how far and how low people will go for what they feel is the American Dream. Think Death of a Salesmen but with a lot more curse words and machine guns.
As for a remake--if someone can twist it into something that makes it as good as the other two, then I don't think I'll mind.
A better written character would have those same ambitions, and not be so stoic, so shallow, I have not seen Howard Hawks, but I have seen some of his work, and I bet that Scarface blows this one out of the water
You seemed to have missed what I was saying.
You see, in early plays, back in the days when Greek tragedies reigned supreme, there were not what one would call "three-demensional" characters. Characters were either completely good, or completely evil, that kind of thing. Same went, in a sense, for Shakespeare's plays. These are called "flat" characters--those who have only a few characteristics, mostly used in morality plays.
That's what I think was used here. Tony Montana is a flat character--a characture of how obsession over wealth and power can slowly destroy the dream and eventually the man.
There's nothing "good" or "bad" about either way of doing characters--just different.
You seemed to have missed what I was saying.
You see, in early plays, back in the days when Greek tragedies reigned supreme, there were not what one would call "three-demensional" characters. Characters were either completely good, or completely evil, that kind of thing. Same went, in a sense, for Shakespeare's plays. These are called "flat" characters--those who have only a few characteristics, mostly used in morality plays.
That's what I think was used here. Tony Montana is a flat character--a characture of how obsession over wealth and power can slowly destroy the dream and eventually the man.
There's nothing "good" or "bad" about either way of doing characters--just different.
I just know that a remake of Scarface will be wall to wall hip hop, rap and big assed women gyrating beside swimming pools and staring Kanye West.
Yeah, it worked awesomely in the 1930s version when they didn't stretch it into some maudlin neon light 3 hour freak show
Yeah but Jack Sparrow is completely bent on obtaining the Black Pearl, and he still is subject to change, and he grows within his character
Maybe your right though, I still don't really like the movie that much
Anybody seen the comic books by IDW?
What would you think of a remake of the classic film starring Al Pacino? Who would you cast? Who would you want to direct? Discuss!
Except that they continue after the movie with Tony coming back to life and settling scores with Sosa and other drug kingpins.I remember seeing something like that. They any good? What are they about?