The Amazing Spider-Man Sequel or Reboot for Spidey?

[Rodrigo90]

Are you happy with the way this franchise is going? Or getting tired of it?

 

[VenomVsSpidey]

sequels. reboot = not till after SM6. long after SM6.

 

[Symbiotic]

Sequels. It hasn't gotten bad enough to abandon the current continuity.

 

[Batspider77]

REEBOOT!!!!
Marvel should get the rights back and hire a Director who really knows the Character of Spiderman.
Spiderman has the biggest Potential of all the Superheros out there....please don´t let it be ruined by Raimi and Sony.

 

[MadVillainy]

For me, its not even that the current continuity has gotten so bad that I want a reboot. Its that I want to see a new vision for the franchise. I mean the current cast a crew have been on for like 10 years and I think they should give someone else a go

Hell, Im hoping that 3 years after SP4 there is a new cast and crew hopefully making a teenage Spiderman film

 

[VenomVsSpidey]

Double

 

[samsnee]

Reboot, but not using Green Goblin or Doctor Octopus again. Save them for the reboot sequel.

 

[SpideyFan914]

Here's the real question: Is this thread a sequel or a reboot?

 

[Spiderine]

Honestly, these directors should be given the opportunity to do their trilogy and move on. Hire someone else to helm the francise after that because their vision just seems to get a little stale. In this instance, they have decided to allow Raimi to return for the fourth which I really don't have a problem with however this should definitely be his last whether it's a masterpiece or a disaster.

 

[Venom 1988]

^^^^
This

 

[The Squirrel]

I was willing to give Raimi a chance (definitely not with Tobey, I really wished they would have cast someone else), but Raimi has sealed his fate and I eagerly await a brand new director.

 

[Flint Marko]

If spider-man 4 does as well as the previous movies have, they should make 5 and probably 6. After that, Marvel Studios needs to acquire the rights to the character and reboot the franchise after a decade or so.

 

[Doc Ock]

Sequels, Spidey 3 IMO wasn't bad enough to ruin the series.

 

[SpideyFan914]

I was willing to give Raimi a chance (definitely not with Tobey, I really wished they would have cast someone else), but Raimi has sealed his fate and I eagerly await a brand new director.

If this is about the Vulturess, I'd like to point out how obviously fake that is.

 

[The Squirrel]

If this is about the Vulturess, I'd like to point out how obviously fake that is.

Yeah, like that horrible rumor that Sandman would be Uncle Ben's killer. I'm glad that wasn't true.

 

[MadVillainy]

I really want a reboot with Michael Angarano as Parker and Emma Stone as MJ

 

[SpideyFan914]

Yeah, like that horrible rumor that Sandman would be Uncle Ben's killer. I'm glad that wasn't true.

More like the rumor that Carnage would turn out to be Aunt May.

 

[FaT_tONle]

If SM4 is somewhat successful and they leave it open ended, I'd consider just recasting and going forward with sequels. Have Lizard in SM5, maybe the Sinister Six in the final installment. But if it turns out to be another turd, I say go back to high school 6-8 years from SM4 and reboot this sucker. Sign actors in their teens to a four movie Twilight type deal. Film some movies back to back here and there so we won't have to wait 4 years between films. Have 3-4 movies out in a span of 4-5 years. Marvel should do the same with X-Men once they get that back as well.

 

[bullets]

If spider-man 4 does as well as the previous movies have, they should make 5 and probably 6. After that, Marvel Studios needs to acquire the rights to the character and reboot the franchise after a decade or so.

I think if Spider-man is good then I would like to see them make it to six and hopefull yfilm 5 and six back to back. Then they could put the franchise in someone elses hands. Spider-man 3 was bad but hopefully thye can find some redemption and if SM4 is bad , reboot the series.

 

[FaT_tONle]

Apparently Vanderbilt's script basically had two films in one script. I don't know where it fits with Raimi's vision (obviously they both weren't on the same page), but if it's as good as the indications were, I'd like to see them work off of that. I doubt Tobey fits into their plans. He'd be filming SM5 by the time he's what? 36? 37? Kinda old. Doable but it has to be done back to back. I don't know if his salary would even make it worthwhile.

 

[SpideyFan914]

If SM4 is somewhat successful and they leave it open ended, I'd consider just recasting and going forward with sequels. Have Lizard in SM5, maybe the Sinister Six in the final installment. But if it turns out to be another turd, I say go back to high school 6-8 years from SM4 and reboot this sucker. Sign actors in their teens to a four movie Twilight type deal. Film some movies back to back here and there so we won't have to wait 4 years between films. Have 3-4 movies out in a span of 4-5 years. Marvel should do the same with X-Men once they get that back as well.

Why not have Lizard in SM4?
(PS: Since you mentioned Twilight, you lost your credibility.)

 

[bullets]

Well if Lizard is not going to be in Spider-man 4 the least they could do is give us a cliffhanger .

 

[FaT_tONle]

Why not have Lizard in SM4?
(PS: Since you mentioned Twilight, you lost your credibility.)

Wow... I am using Twilight as a business model (and a darn good one) in this instance. And if you have been reading anything the past 24 hours you'd realize Lizard is HIGHLY unlikely at this point.

 

[Venom 1988]

edit

 

[Eggyman]

It shouldn't need to be all about reboots. The comics don't reboot (very rarely/ultimates), they just go on and on even when the writers and artists change. The movies should just do the same. Just release Spidey films for **** sake. Let someone tell a stand-alone story, without changing or warping what's come before. None of this carrying arcs over.

We know who Spidey is and we know how he came to be. Just give us some good stories without all this attention to arcs and franchise continuity.