Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]454493[/split]
Anyone reckon someone upstairs saw her scenes and was like, 'O that's sh**.' I'm not a hater or a fan of the girl but just wondered this.
Anyone reckon someone upstairs saw her scenes and was like, 'O that's sh**.' I'm not a hater or a fan of the girl but just wondered this.
They announce the sequels in 2016 and 2018. She gets cut. Shailene has a commitment to Divergent. It kinda adds up but then again, who knows what goes on behind closed doors. It's possible her scenes sucked and they're using her other commitments as a well-timed excuse.![]()
I'm fine with the decision; it IS sad for Shailene, especially if she's not able to come back when the character does get introduced, but it makes sense and isn't the big production-shattering deal people are making it out to be.
The thing I could do without is the 'she wasn't pretty enough' crap-storm that the news has reignited.
I'm just ignoring that tidbit too.Woodley beauty profile?
Woodley beauty profile?
I didn't know Woodley was this terribly ugly actress until coming on to these boards. I'm not even a fan or anti fan of Woodley, I'm not saying she is the best choice because who knows? But the snide remarks about her looks are so over the top and nasty. You'd think she was the ugliest person ever to be cast in a movie. It's not shocking to me though, that's how people have always been about this character. Anything less than Megan Fox style looks is unacceptable.
is movieweb reliable at all? they're reporting sarah gadon is replacing shailene.