Should Batman have been able to beat Captain America?

Discussion in 'The Community Diner' started by Dr. Fate, Mar 6, 2005.

  1. Marvin Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    19,564
    Likes Received:
    1
    respectfully indeed

    what u say has alot of weight!

    and that (along with his brains and very extensive knowledge) is probubly why deathstroke can take batman 7 out of 10 times(cap ain't no deathstroke)

    thing is, deathstroke is hardpressed to take shiva(or conner) down and they're mere mortals
    2 of the few who are better than batman.

    that says mountians about technique over physical advantage

    one of most important philosophies in martial arts(ninjitzu/akido for example) are to use ur opponets strength(s) against them...
    the harder cap punches, the further he'll fly...but that's just hearsay

    with that i'm off
    if u've got anything else to say i'll get to it when i do

    later
     
  2. Clark K. Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2006
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, you seem to be more knowledgable on the subject of Batman an martial arts than I. You are his fanboy, and this term is used out of utmost respect now, just saying you know him well. I took this as a learning experience, and if I think of another idea or something, I'll post it, cause maybe we can both learn from this...
     
  3. supermarvelman Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,685
    Likes Received:
    0
    Are you still going Marvin, Jeez let it go. ****in loser.

    Again, you seem to not get this through you thinck skull, my comment about not budging was diected, directly at you nobody else, You were stating the same arguements over and over, and you didn;t convince me, so I was letting you know, that I would not budge, that doesn't mean soembody else cant convince me. About the name calling big ****in deal, what are 6 years old, words are only words.
     
  4. Marvin Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    19,564
    Likes Received:
    1
    yea guess i am

    I'll no doubt stop when i'm either proven wrong, or when i'm proven write(unconditionally)
    or when i'm satisfied that some sort of answer or settlement has been reached

    I won't however stop just cause some "grown man" told me to
    and then called me a name.

    then again, it's all ur opinion isn't it

    (u have a funny concept of loser by the way)
     
  5. supermarvelman Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,685
    Likes Received:
    0
    Your a funny guy you know that.

    Oh my god he called me a name, I'm gonna go tell my mommy, Marvin have you never called anybody a name before? I doubt it, so dont act all high and mighty okay, kid. "oldrazz woot loser".
     
  6. Eros Registered

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2005
    Messages:
    7,718
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wow this discussion is why we all are loyal fanboys. Nearly 2 in the morning, and we still are on this pointless subject.
     
  7. Marvin Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    19,564
    Likes Received:
    1

    One, I've more pointed out the fact as opposed to whine about it.
    why are u implying that i'm "running and telling my mommy," all i've done is asked u to stop...

    I'm not acting "all high and mighty"
    I'm just "acting" like a sensible poster in a debate...
    if anything, ur acting low and shallow...

    Listen, I'm really not so concerned with if or when u resort to "calling names" I am on the other very interested in why...
    I can think of a few reasons why one would resort to such things when arguing:o
    (i'll let ur figure them out on ur own)

    i have a rhetoric and philosophy class, and i enjoy a good debate...

    to answer ur question
    yea sure I've called ppl names before(mostly when i was younger)
    but never in a debate...that would be silly

    later
     
  8. Brainiac 8 Clark Smash!

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2005
    Messages:
    15,845
    Likes Received:
    2
    If Batman ever fought Cap...it would go something like this.

    Batman would jump out like this:

    [​IMG]

    Then get slightly distracted when Robin gets in position:

    [​IMG]

    But Ultimately win by doing this:

    [​IMG]

    And Robin would exclaim:

    [​IMG]

    Holy Hurting Anus Batman!
     
  9. sto_vo_kor_2000 Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2006
    Messages:
    3,037
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually at the end of the Negotiation's DC caved in on the Batman issue but Marvel got greedy and wanted it all.....DC wanted to hold onto Superman because their was talk about doing a film.
     
  10. blud_knight Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,273
    Likes Received:
    0
    ^ if marvel got a hold of all of DC's rights to characters i would quit reading mainstream comics. I would rather see batman turn into a villan and start canabalizing orphans and nuns than see him turn into reed richards best bud.:oldrazz:
     
  11. supermarvelman Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,685
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not me, I think if Marvel had bought DC, Marvel would've done much better with there characters than DC has IMO.
     
  12. Brainiac 8 Clark Smash!

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2005
    Messages:
    15,845
    Likes Received:
    2
    If Marvel bought the DC characters, then where would Marvel get most of their big event ideas?:huh:
     
  13. supermarvelman Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,685
    Likes Received:
    0
    Your kidding yourself. I have yet to see Civil Crisis or Secret Crisis or Infinite War.
     
  14. blud_knight Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,273
    Likes Received:
    0
    ^ you will now, they have people scouting these boards as we speak
     
  15. DACMAN The Spidey Fan

    Joined:
    May 27, 2001
    Messages:
    11,274
    Likes Received:
    1
    That's the most backwards thing i've ever read. Every bit of DC tries to be Marvel in any way it can. Even the fact Superman and Batman have any kind of personality is owed to Marvel.
     
  16. supermarvelman Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,685
    Likes Received:
    0
  17. Midnight Ice Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    3,400
    Likes Received:
    0
    Oh really? I must have missed that Batman WASN'T a normal human and was given the Super Soldier Serum or anything like it that would enhance his endurance. Cap has the edge here, whether you want to admit it or not.:xmen:
     
  18. Clark K. Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2006
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    0
    Alot of us agreed to disagree on this one.
     
  19. Maxinsc Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2006
    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    0
    CAptin America ftw
     
  20. blud_knight Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,273
    Likes Received:
    0
    DACMAN have you ever read a DC comic in your life? Wow!? Wow!? :whatever:
    superman and batman evolved like any other characters. why would you credit them to marvel? Give me some hard evidence.
     
  21. kgcarini Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2002
    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is how it would go down....

    :brucebat:

    takes Cap's

    :cap:

    in the face then

    :batty:

    is blocked by Cap's

    :cap:

    then Cap's

    :cap: + :batman:

    = Captain America the winner! :bow:
     
  22. Anubis Sup?

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Messages:
    66,237
    Likes Received:
    1
  23. DACMAN The Spidey Fan

    Joined:
    May 27, 2001
    Messages:
    11,274
    Likes Received:
    1
    Yes. I read a lot of Batman and Superman. They "evolved" after the Marvel Age of comics (the early 60's for those of you who need "hard evidence"). Stan Lee introduced the hero that had at home problems and character flaws. Superman and Batman had none of those until Marvel did it first. The reason Marvel turned so many heads in the early 60's was because of that. Superheroes at the time were nothing more than their costume and powers. Marvel injected them with humanity. Anyone who doesn't know that, I would assume, isn't a very big comic fan to begin with.
     
  24. Docker2.0 Watchin' you!

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    25,283
    Likes Received:
    2,419
    Way to resurrect a thread after being dead for years. Oh! And Cap would own Bats. They are basically even but that super soldier formula would give Cap the edge becuase it would go on for hours and Cap would not get tired at all. They are basically dead even. I'd say Cap is a better strategist while Bats is the better detective, deducing Cap has no real weaknesses, he'd bow out, like he did in JLA vs. Avengers.
     
  25. DACMAN The Spidey Fan

    Joined:
    May 27, 2001
    Messages:
    11,274
    Likes Received:
    1
    I like Batman more, but I agree. Batman is the world's greatest detective. Cap on the other hand is the world's greatest fighter and military strategist. Not to mention Cap is pushing the superhuman ability card (peak human everything and doesn't tire), while Bruce is simply a human.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"