Sequels Should Carnage be the villain in Spidey 4?

I vote "no" unless most of the old school classics have already been used. Personally, I'd rather see Electro, the Lizard, Kraven, Mysterio and even the Vulture and the Hobgoblin first. It's not that Carnage is a bad character but I feel that other than great visuals, he just wouldn't add much to a story plot.
 
if they are done with venom in spidey3, they should have the lizard as the villian in spidey4, if venom survives, then it should be venom and lizard as the main villian.
 
I vote yes due to the only reason that Raimi had no original reason to use Venom until confronted by Stan Lee. Why the hell would you decide to make a movie involving one of the most legendary comic villains such as Venom in one movie...include for the final 10 mins just to set up Spider Man 4 and Have the Lizard come in. WTF is gonna happen to Eddie Brock/Venom. Theres no point in bringing the lizard in. If he is in the movie, why dont they give him a 10 minute cameo? We want to see what Venom does in the 4th one. Carnage is the only logical villain for the 4th due to the fact that:

A: Venom is at the final 10 mins of the movie(Like I just said)
B: SM4 will most definately show what happens to Eddie after his encounter with the symbiote. (Thus Ravencroft Institute meeting Kasady)
C: And boom, spawn of Venom.

Once again no point in starting an SM4 if you end the 3rd with Venom only being in it for 10 mins. Cause we want to see more of him and the birth of Carnage.
 
i voted yes because carnage is one of spidermans most vile villians other than VENOM!!!!!!!
 
dylan_newport_2002.jpg


How many tiiimes must a thread be posted, before they can call it real old?
 
I voted 'yes' since it would follow up to the symbiote story-line in 3.
 
That's exactly why I chose yes because the whole story line to Spider-Man 3, to me it makes since to bring Carnage in the 4 movie.
 
it is really doubtful that they would use another symbiote villain if they made a fourth movie. the only reason Raimi even put venom in 3 is, for one, because the studio made him, and two, because he was able to find humanity in the character. carange doesn't have that humanity. i suppose he could be reworked a bit, but if raimi's still helming the movies, and i hope he would be, carnage is definitely out of the picture.
 
If Eddie dies in SM3, then I say no.

If Eddie survives in SM3, then I say maybe.

Carnage isn't really anything but a poor man's Venom, in my opinion. A mass murdering maniac with a symbiote advantage. No real story there.
 
I don't think Raimi would dare to do that.
Way too many blood for a child's movie. And without the mass murder, it isn't really Carnage.
 
I voted yes cuz without carnage, venom will be nothing, becuase he is like his evil twin :wow:
 
Since these movies focus on Peter (and Mj) and care only about telling their story first and foremost, I say no carnage. Unless maybe if Venom comes back somehow, but that sounds boring.

Cletus has no relationship to Spider man, and Carnage seems more like Venom's villain at times. Venom works better because his orgin is central to Spider man's story, carnage has nothing to do with it.

I would rather have another goblin, than another symbiot.
 
fallenAngel said:
Since these movies focus on Peter (and Mj) and care only about telling their story first and foremost, I say no carnage. Unless maybe if Venom comes back somehow, but that sounds boring.

Cletus has no relationship to Spider man, and Carnage seems more like Venom's villain at times. Venom works better because his orgin is central to Spider man's story, carnage has nothing to do with it.

I would rather have another goblin, than another symbiot.

Agreed, Goblins in flying pads w/ lots of explosives are cool.
But that's one too many goblins for a series in my opinion.
 
No would like to see just venom cont. from sm3 or a brand new villian like Lizard or vulture.
 
i guess i dont really know but it wouldnt be rite without carnage following on from venom so maybe.
 
yeh thats kinda true.... things like the ps1 games...:-)word::word::word::word: lol) there was carnage in them as a follow on from venom so yeh i kinda agree...
 
usernameinuse said:
I don't think Raimi would dare to do that.
Way too many blood for a child's movie. And without the mass murder, it isn't really Carnage.

^^^I concur 200%. Carnage is too much for a Spidey movie. He would have to be watered down too much. I love Venom and Carnage, but those 2 should duke it out in a rated -R Venom spin off movie. Just let them slaughter each other.
 
Forget Carnage,I want to see classic,and new types of villains that we haven't gotten yet.
 
Personally, I'd rather see Lizard i sm4 but if Venom impresses in sm3, then I wouldn't mind seeing carnage and dont think the studio wont go there because they will. With the way sm3's going, its going to be pretty hard to top.
 
No Carnage before Lizard, and/or Scorpion, and/or Rhino, and/or Vulture, and/or Electro, and/or Chameleon, and/or Smythe & his Spider-slayers, and/or Kraven is in a movie.
 
I want Electro.
Lizard is great, too.

Hell no to Carnage.
 
yes i would like carnage but not yet maybe 5 or somethin like that but i rather have like mystrio and team ups and all that like spidey with the FF or black cat
 
Naaaahhhh. I'm not to big on Carnage. Bring on the Lizard!
 
It depends on what happens here. If the symbiote story-line is well received and succesful, Venom/Eddie survives, then COUNT ME IN.

BUT for that, they should at least name or hint or make a cameo of Cletus Kasady in the 3rd one.

This would also create a continuity that Spider Man movies has, a very valuable thing that Batman, for example, lacks completely.

I don't know if I would make Carnage as the lead villain, though. I still have my doubts.

I voted yes.

D! (dyego)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"