Sequels Singer Directing The Sequel, Yes Or No?

SUPERSEBAS

Sidekick
Joined
Oct 15, 2005
Messages
1,072
Reaction score
0
Points
31
Hello everybody! I read a lot of fan critics, and I surprise that a lot of big fans of superman, says that the movie is good, but is not Great! and there are a lot of people that dosent like the movie, only a 30 % ( approximately) says that the movie is AMAZING!

So afther all this, I would like to know! , Fans want SINGER DIRECTING THE SEQUEL?
 
Considering his X-Men was good but not great, while his X2 really hit home and based itself on a classic storyline. I want to see exactly what he'll do with number 2. Seemed like second time was the charm for him last time.
 
Absolutely Singer should direct it.

The sequel will be more cost effective (cheaper to film than this) since alot of production elements are already designed from the first film. Brandon said on Letterman, it should be cheaper to film.

Singer needs to continue the story he layed out in SR. He seems to have an exact vision of where hes taking it and I want to see it play out instead of risking an X3.

The tone of SR should be maintained for the sequel. I like it. Its mature, serious and heartfelt and even if that doesnt draw the little kids in for the big bucks, as long as the sequel breaks even or makes some profit with their reduced budget....thats all that matters.

I wouldnt want to see quality sacrified for $$$ greed.
 
Please NO, We will end up with a Zod and Co. sequal.
 
The writers said at Moviehole.com that they have no intentions to use Zod in the sequels.

But they said they may want to deal with the theme of possible Kryptonian survivors that arent Zod.

I guess that ties into the mystery of the 'astronomers discovered remains of Krypton' part from SR that they set up.

Curious to see how it plays out.
 
i'd love for Singer to direct the sequel. he showed that he CAN make a great Superman flick with the heart and soul that Superman deserves to be made with. Singer will always be welcomed by this Superman fan...
 
Going with a different director always works (note the sarcasm). Honestly even if this one wasn't as good as some people expected it to be (I loved it by the way) no one can deny that changing director would spell death for the series. The only reason Superman II is considered good in my book is because Donner's work is still eveident in some scenes and you can tell where the came in and camped it up with Lester's direction. Every franchise that has gone that way has ended badly, Superman, Batman and X-men. If it ain't broke, don't even try to fix it.
 
NO DAMN ZOD, no Luthor anymore. It was great for this movie, but enough is enough.

They should listen to the Fans ! Brainiac,Metallo,Darkseid,Bizzaro and Doomsday and lots of ACTION, no softcock more Testosteron. Mega - Fights, Metropolis destroyed and new authors.
 
Damn straight Singer should direct it......... anyone who voted No, are either worried about the Zod thing, or are still bitter about the hole x3 thing
 
Angel Of Dark said:
Damn straight Singer should direct it......... anyone who voted No, are either worried about the Zod thing, or are still bitter about the hole x3 thing

Hmmm or we have minds of our own and think he is not the great director you seem to think he is.
While I think Xmen and SR are good films they should and could have been great films if he cared about all the source material not just bits and parts of it.
And some of us do not really want our comic book hero's humanized we like them as iconic COMIC BOOK HERO'S you know a flying storm from day one....A more original superman story based of the comics or heck even STAS etc etc etc....
 
it's simple....Superman Returns = X-Men, Superman Returns Sequel = X2. as we all know...X2 was TONS better than X-Men. if Singer directs the Superman Returns Sequel it will be tons better than Superman Returns.
 
NateGray said:
Hmmm or we have minds of our own and think he is not the great director you seem to think he is.
While I think Xmen and SR are good films they should and could have been great films if he cared about all the source material not just bits and parts of it.
And some of us do not really want our comic book hero's humanized we like them as iconic COMIC BOOK HERO'S you know a flying storm from day one....A more original superman story based of the comics or heck even STAS etc etc etc....
:up:

YES, Superman returns is GOOD, but bring the MAN back, the MAN damn.

He should do good ass kicking, if Singer is capable of bring in Metallo,Brainiac,Bizarro and do a FUN-Action packed Testosteron Movie , no one will talk about gayness.
Spider Man 2 was fun, while Spidey 1 was not that great....hopefully Singer can show some good action elements, some hyperextension FIGHTS. Thats Superman, an icon. If he is not capable of hire Sam Raimi,J.J.Abrams..
 
Clearly Singer is capable. There were some sic Mutant vs Mutant fights in X-men along with that awesome Nightcrawler seqeunce.

He simply just wanted the first film to have Lex Luthor VS Superman..... and not Superman VS a supervillian with Lex taking a backseat...
 
hell u could bring lex back since he isnt dead but just not that much screen time (although i dont mind lex being back he was awesome!)..make it a two villian flick this time
 
NateGray said:
Hmmm or we have minds of our own and think he is not the great director you seem to think he is.
While I think Xmen and SR are good films they should and could have been great films if he cared about all the source material not just bits and parts of it.
And some of us do not really want our comic book hero's humanized we like them as iconic COMIC BOOK HERO'S you know a flying storm from day one....A more original superman story based of the comics or heck even STAS etc etc etc....

IMO, I like my Superhero's humanized...... you can relate to them better...
 
Kane said:
Clearly Singer is capable. There were some sic Mutant vs Mutant fights in X-men along with that awesome Nightcrawler seqeunce.

He simply just wanted the first film to have Lex Luthor VS Superman..... and not Superman VS a supervillian with Lex taking a backseat...

Why not ? METALLO like in the John Byrne Man of Steel days, with a green Kryptonite in....
think that would have worked better than those henchman, the one Indian guy and those others.
Metallo and Lex would have worked good together. The Fans missed a superherovillain, really.

For the lack of superherovillains, we want 2 see at least 2 or 3 supervillains in Superman 2 (by Singer?) like in Spider - Man 3. There is so much money (260 Million dollar production budget) and no superherovillain like Doomsday,Metallo,Brainiac in

Fans should do some Lobby work for supervillains,big fights, cmon the movie was good, but I missed NEW FACES, supervillains. I dont want to see a Remake Donner film again and again. Why honor Donner ? Do your own thing, damn.
Singer do your own thing, listen to the Fans and everything is o.k.

I think the authors arent that good, bring in John Byrne or someone else who just reads Superman Comics everyday and knows what to do.
Singer is a great director, but the sequel needs improvement.
 
Bale said:
Why not ? METALLO like in the John Byrne Man of Steel days, with a green Kryptonite in....
think that would have worked better than those henchman, the one Indian guy and those others.
Metallo and Lex would have worked good together. The Fans missed a superherovillain, really.

For the lack of superherovillains, we want 2 see at least 2 or 3 supervillains in Superman 2 (by Singer?) like in Spider - Man 3. There is so much money (260 Million dollar production budget) and no superherovillain like Doomsday,Metallo,Brainiac in

Fans should do some Lobby work for supervillains,big fights, cmon the movie was good, but I missed NEW FACES, supervillains. I dont want to see a Remake Donner film again and again. Why honor Donner ? Do your own thing, damn.
Singer do your own thing, listen to the Fans and everything is o.k.

I think the authors arent that good, bring in John Byrne or someone else who just reads Superman Comics everyday and knows what to do.
Singer is a great director, but the sequel needs improvement.

Singer won't listen to the fans. He didn't in the X-Men films, and he didn't in Superman. He's going to do what he's going to do. It's sad, but true.
 
If singer does get to do the 2nd one, he better get NEW writers, the current ones need a slap.
 
dpm07 said:
Singer won't listen to the fans. He didn't in the X-Men films, and he didn't in Superman. He's going to do what he's going to do. It's sad, but true.

i'm glad he doesn't listen to the fans (to an extent)....if he did what the fans wanted, we would've probably had a Superman that's similar to Sandy Collora's Superman from his World's Finest trailer.
 
I woudln't care if he directed it but he needs to do 2 things.

Cut out alot of the mush mush with Lois. Ok its established that he's back & they really aren't or can't be together because of Richard.

2. MORE ACTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
GarudA said:
If singer does get to do the 2nd one, he better get NEW writers, the current ones need a slap.

Totally. Took all the best bits from Donner's films. I couldn't believe some of the dialogue at times. Dull to the core.
 
GarudA said:
If singer does get to do the 2nd one, he better get NEW writers, the current ones need a slap.

yeah, the writers should read some comics and less Bold and Beatiful.

They should hire John Byrne,David Goyer or someone who reads comics.
The movie is good, needs improvement for the sequel and more supervillains, at least 2-3 superherovillains:

1. Brainiac
2. Metallo
3. Bizarro
4. Darkseid
5. Doomsday

The best thing is bring em all and do a Action packed movie. No conversation, just ass kicking action.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"