Smackdown 2007 for PS3 cancelled

Horrorfan

Superhero
Joined
Apr 3, 2006
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
0
Points
31
Yep, IGN and THQ have both confirmed that for PS3, there will be no smackdown vs raw 2007. So if you want to play true next gen smackdown this year, you will need a 360.

It's still coming for ps2 and psp, in a somewhat irrelevant versions that won't have the sheer spectacle of the 360 exclusive smackdown.
 
Yeah, I heard about this. That totally sucks a$$:mad:
 
I heard it was cancelled b/c PS3 has a high enzyme count in its liver, possibly due to Hep C :o
 
:up:
Prognosticator said:
I heard it was cancelled b/c PS3 has a high enzyme count in its liver, possibly due to Hep C :o


LOL that was fairly clever.:up:


as long as kurt, lashley, king booker and the boogeyman are in this, it will be awesome.


also jake roberts (no tricks this time), bret hart, bulldog, demolition , lod and the rockers as legends
 
Horrorfan said:
:up:


LOL that was fairly clever.:up:


as long as kurt, lashley, king booker and the boogeyman are in this, it will be awesome.


also jake roberts (no tricks this time), bret hart, bulldog, demolition , lod and the rockers as legends

Hmm.. It seems game companies/devs are running from Sony like the Plague nowadays. :down
 
Horrorfan said:
Yep, IGN and THQ have both confirmed that for PS3, there will be no smackdown vs raw 2007. So if you want to play true next gen smackdown this year, you will need a 360.

It's still coming for ps2 and psp, in a somewhat irrelevant versions that won't have the sheer spectacle of the 360 exclusive smackdown.

SO the PS2 and PSP versions are missing features?
 
Zenien said:
SO the PS2 and PSP versions are missing features?

They probably will. :(

PS2 and PSP won't probably be able to handle as much game as the X360 can.
 
Horrorfan said:
Yep, IGN and THQ have both confirmed that for PS3, there will be no smackdown vs raw 2007. So if you want to play true next gen smackdown this year, you will need a 360.

It's still coming for ps2 and psp, in a somewhat irrelevant versions that won't have the sheer spectacle of the 360 exclusive smackdown.
no one cares about the ps3.
 
It's a WRESTLING game, not Oblivion. I highly doubt that the PS2 version would be ground to a halt having to render the legs on a table or something. :o
 
Zenien said:
SO the PS2 and PSP versions are missing features?

Not positive. Im not sure if they use the analogue system that 360 has, but I do know it doesnt look a billionth as good as the next gen version which is life like. You will be picking up the inferior version, but the choice is still there I guess, even if it would be akin to playing pong over rockstar's table tennis.

I gotta say z, never saw you as a wrestling fan before.
 
Zenien said:
It's a WRESTLING game, not Oblivion. I highly doubt that the PS2 version would be ground to a halt having to render the legs on a table or something. :o

You never know.. they might have to skimp on some features to make it work as well as the X360 version. :confused:

Just because of the type of the game doesn't mean it is always going to fill this or that mold. :mad:
 
I don't care about Oblivion anymore :O

I got $50 for it off some idiot just outside Gamestop the other day as I was walking towards the store :up:
 
Horrorfan said:
Not positive. Im not sure if they use the analogue system that 360 has, but I do know it doesnt look a billionth as good as the next gen version which is life like. You will be picking up the inferior version, but the choice is still there I guess, even if it would be akin to playing pong over rockstar's table tennis.

I gotta say z, never saw you as a wrestling fan before.

I'm not, but my dad use to make me sit down and watch wrestling with him sometimes.

I'm willing to bet my account that there wouldn't be any feature loss between the games. THere's just nothing in wrestling that would be so demanding as to exclude it. I mean the most intensive thing would be the thing with like a ton of guys in the ring at once right? I'm pretty sure the PS2 Smackdown games do that don't they.

I've seen the game though, they look like Zombies, definately not lifelike. :confused:
 
Zenien said:
I'm not, but my dad use to make me sit down and watch wrestling with him sometimes.

I'm willing to bet my account that there wouldn't be any feature los between the games.

I've seen the game though, they look like Zombies, definately not lifelike. :confused:

Zombies? ROFL!!!

For some reason, that amuses me. Zombies doing Stone Cold stunners and piledrivers to each other would be a hell of a game.
 
Zenien said:
I'm not, but my dad use to make me sit down and watch wrestling with him sometimes.

I'm willing to bet my account that there wouldn't be any feature loss between the games. THere's just nothing in wrestling that would be so demanding as to exclude it. I mean the most intensive thing would be the thing with like a ton of guys in the ring at once right? I'm pretty sure the PS2 Smackdown games do that don't they.

I've seen the game though, they look like Zombies, definately not lifelike. :confused:


I hope you mean the ps2 version, because the 360 version looks basically real (I think I'd know seeing as I watch the shows regularly).

Basically, why would you choose pong over rockstar's table tennis? Thats what it basically would be.
 
You can't make something look real when the whole sport is bull**** :o
 
Exactly. And it's not like people care about the wrestling, but more about the gimmcks nowadays.
 
Axid said:
You can't make something look real when the whole sport is bull**** :o

I was going to say that.. but I figured it might piss a few people off. :up:

Thanks for taking the fall for me. :)
 
Grow balls then :).....though, it doesn't take balls to be like that on an internet forum :O


Example: Zenien :o




( Zenien I love you and our children)
 
Extromaniac said:
Zombies? ROFL!!!

For some reason, that amuses me. Zombies doing Stone Cold stunners and piledrivers to each other would be a hell of a game.


You can do that in dead rising :D
 
Axid said:
Grow balls then :).....though, it doesn't take balls to be like that on an internet forum :O

I suppose you're saying you don't have balls then? :o
 
Extromaniac said:
I suppose you're saying you don't have balls then? :o
I suppose you are trying to be funny with me, but it didn't work :mad:


:D
 
Axid said:
I suppose you are trying to be funny with me, but it didn't work :mad:


:D

I suppose you are trying to think up a good response to that, but that also didn't work. :mad:

:up:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"