Sony Hack Saga: CEO Michael Lynton Steps Down

Jason Kane

Sidekick
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Messages
2,879
Reaction score
4
Points
33
Finally!!! Now we can await Rothman's exit next.

http://variety.com/2017/biz/news/michael-lynton-out-at-sony-pictures-entertainment-1201960312/

UPDATED: Sony Pictures Entertainment Chairman and CEO Michael Lynton announced Friday that he is stepping down from the entertainment conglomerate to focus his attention on his chairmanship of Snap, Inc., the social media owner of Snapchat in which he has a major investment.

Lynton is leaving his post atop the conglomerate’s motion picture, television and music units but will remain on as co-CEO for six months to help lead a search for his replacement. The announcement of the departure said Sony Corporation CEO Kazuo Hirai will focus with Lynton on the search for a new leader, with the Japanese businessman taking on a much higher profile in the operation. He will serve alongside Lynton as co-CEO of Sony Pictures Entertainment and open a second office for himself on the Culver City lot.

Among those rumored to be in line for Lynton’s post: DreamWorks Animation founder and former CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg, Tribune Media president and CEO Peter Liguori and Jim Gianopulos, recently ousted as chairman and CEO of Fox Filmed Entertainment. Two sources close to Gianopulos said, however, that there had been no contact between him and Sony.

Another possibility floated late last year: that the Tokyo-based conglomerate would merge the troubled entertainment unit with its more profitable gaming division. That would potentially put Andrew House, the boss of Sony Interactive Entertainment, in charge of the film and television studio.

“It has been an extraordinary 13 years and an honor to work at Sony with some of the most talented and creative people in the entertainment space,” Lynton said in a statement. Explaining his move to the tech upstart he added: “I have been involved with Evan and Snapchat since its early days, and given its growth since then, decided the time was right to transition and focus on my role as Chairman of the Board of Snap Inc.”

The Harvard-educated Lynton was a respected leader in Hollywood, but his regime suffered multiple blows, particularly the 2014 hack of the studio’s computers that led to a series of embarrassing revelations about internal operations. Motion picture co-chair Amy Pascal lost her job following the scandal and workers from top to bottom of the organization were unsettled by revelations in the emails.

More recently, Sony’s Motion Picture Group has struggled to find box office winners, with a string of under-performing films, including “Ghostbusters,” “Inferno,” and, most recently, “Passengers,” the sci-fi romance, starring Chris Pratt and Jennifer Lawrence.
 
How the heck would you merge Film with Gaming? That makes no sense.
 
If Rothman goes, can he just be exiled from Hollywood for good?
 
Technically, he wouldn't necessarily have to leave. It's the CEO stepping down. Rothman is Chairman of Motion Picture Group. Lynton is basically Rothman's boss. Or rather former boss here.
 
There's always the chance that the new CEO drops him. Either way, I don't think it matters much anymore. Sony Pictures is dying a slow death.
 
I hardly doubt it'd be the end of Rothman in the industry. After leaving Fox he got picked up by Sony. Then after Amy Pascal got fired, they gave him her job.

The guy's forged good relationships with the big whigs in town. It's about who you know. And he seems to know everybody.
 
Honestly, Sony should just focus on their gaming, record label and electronic gadget unit. Does Sony even own a non cable TV network? They are the only one from the big six that doesn't operate a major broadcasting network in America. I just feel their film/TV division just drags them down and that is not good for business.
 
THR:
Sony Takes $962M Film Unit Write-Down
Gavin J. Blair & Georg Szalai said:
Sony Corp. said Monday just after midnight L.A. time that it is taking a non-cash goodwill impairment charge in its film division.

Companies regularly test for possible impairments under accounting rules and take write-downs when the fair value of an asset falls below the book value recorded on a company's balance sheet.

"Today Sony Corp. announced that a goodwill impairment charge for the pictures segment of 112.1 billion yen (approximately 962 million U.S. dollars) was recorded as an operating loss in the third quarter ending December 31, 2016," a note from CEO Kazuo Hirai and Sony Entertainment CEO Michael Lynton said.

It said the write-down came "as a result of revising the future profitability projection for the pictures segment."

"The majority of the goodwill that was impaired was originally recorded at the time of the acquisition of Columbia Pictures Entertainment Inc. in 1989," it said. "The impact on the consolidated results forecast for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2017 (April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2017) of this impairment and other factors is currently being evaluated and will be disclosed at the earnings announcement for the third quarter ended December 31, 2016 scheduled to be held on February 2, 2017."

And Sony said: "The impairment charge resulted from a downward revision in the future profitability projection for the motion pictures business within the pictures segment. The downward revision was primarily due to a lowering of previous expectations regarding the home entertainment business, mainly driven by an acceleration of market decline. Underlying profitability projections of film performance were also reduced, but the adverse impact of that reduction is expected to be largely mitigated by measures that have been identified to improve the profitability of the motion pictures business."

However, Hirai and Lynton reiterated Sony Corp.'s commitment to Sony Pictures Entertainment in an email to employees: "We, the management of Sony Corp and Sony Entertainment, take the fact of recording a substantial impairment charge very seriously. But make no mistake; Sony Corp’s commitment to SPE remains unchanged. The value of high-quality content continues to rise. As we have stated on many occasions, including at SPE’s all-hands meeting at the end of last year, Sony Corp. sees SPE as a very important part of Sony group and will continue to invest to achieve long-term growth and increased profits in this space."

The email continued, "We look forward to working together to achieve our consolidated financial targets of more than 10 percent in [return on equity] and 500 billion yen [$4.35 billion] in operating income."

Hirai is establishing an office at SPE and plans to spend more time there as the search for Lynton's successor goes on. Lynton announced earlier this month that he is leaving to become chairman of Snapchat owner Snap.

An analyst who covers Sony at a global financial institution in Tokyo, who asked not to be identified, told The Hollywood Reporter, "the film business has been struggling for years. This year, the only big release will be Spiderman and last year there were no big hits."

Sony also announced that it will sell part of its stake in M3 Inc, a network services provider that Sony established in 2000, to Goldman Sachs Japan for approximately $322 million (¥37 billion) in order to, "to strengthen its financial resources." The sale, the final price of which will be made public on Tuesday, will reduce Sony's stake to 34 percent, though it will remain the largest shareholder.
 
So much pressure on Spider man Homecoming to perform. They better increase Iron Man's screen time.
 
Iron Man's screentime in this is already a touchy subject for a few hardcore Spider-Man fans already.

Don't see why they'd need to increase RDJ's screentime given his presence in the marketing alone will attract lots of folks.
 
Iron Man's screentime in this is already a touchy subject for a few hardcore Spider-Man fans already.

Don't see why they'd need to increase RDJ's screentime given his presence in the marketing alone will attract lots of folks.
I think that was a joke. :funny:
 
It's hard to tell sometimes, honestly. :hehe:
 
Sony’s $962M Entertainment Write Down: A Cautionary Tale For Hollywood Investors
David Lieberman said:
There’s something about Hollywood that dazzles overseas investors — most recently led by those in China. But the $962 million write down that Sony took this morning for its entertainment unit should give them pause.

Sony’s announcement contributed to a 3.5% drop today in its U.S. shares. And it revives painful memories from 1989 when the Japanese conglomerate believed it could ride the entertainment tiger — and made one of the worst deals in corporate history.


Today’s announcement heightened speculation that CEO Kazuo Hirai is setting the stage for a change — possibly a sale of the studio — although he and Sony Pictures Entertainment’s Michael Lynton assured employees this morning that the company’s commitment to movies and TV remains “unchanged.”

SPE is “a very important part of Sony group” and the company “will continue to invest to achieve long-term growth and increased profits in this space,” they said in a memo.

Still, it’s easy to appreciate why many Sony watchers wonder whether Hirai is thinking about a change.

This was the first big impairment charge for the unit since the shocking $2.7 billion one Sony took in 1994. That tacitly acknowledged that the Japanese conglomerate paid about twice as much as it should have in 1989 when it laid out $3.4 billion for Columbia Pictures stock, assumed $1.4 billion in debt, and agreed to pay Warner Bros. another $500 million to let producers Peter Guber and Jon Peters out of their contract so they could move to Sony.

Generally speaking, it’s easier for sellers and buyers to discuss asset values after write downs that get bad news out of the way. With Lynton planning to leave, the charge also would help a new leader — or owner — to craft a story showing growth and other improvements.

And the timing of the announcement is curious. Sony didn’t respond to a sudden or unexpected development. It took the charge to recognize a long term trend: DVD and other home entertainment sales have diminished to the point where the financial types felt they had to assign a new asset value to the studio — which it had carried at the 1989 purchase price less the 1994 charge — the company says.

With the new write down, Sony says that the Production & Distribution operation (not including Media Networks) is just worth the value of the hard assets. It no longer puts a dollar figure on the brand name, or other hard-to-quantify qualities that the accounting world classifies as “goodwill.”

To be sure, the writedown makes sense without assuming ulterior motives. Hirai and Lynton said this morning that the company is “moving forward” with efforts to improve movie profits — and is prepared to be patient.

“One of Sony’s great strengths is the diversity of its business portfolio and unifying power of the ‘SONY’ brand,” they say. “Each business must be autonomous, self-sustaining, but at the same time they work cooperatively under the common identity of ‘SONY’, aiming to enhance the total corporate value of Sony group. It is important to keep in mind that there was a time when some businesses were facing tough challenges; other businesses helped us to improve and sustain the profitability of the entire Sony Group.”

But that isn’t what Sony bargained for when it became a Hollywood power. And it should serve as a sobering reminder for those eager to buy into show business that it’s like no business they know.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"