'Sony' Official Accuses 'MS' Of Copying Their Strategies....

[THWIP*]

UNBELIEVEABLE. TALK ABOUT THE POT CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK. I SUPPOSE WHATEVER ONLINE STRATEGY 'SONY' IS SCRAMBLING TO THROW TOGETHER.........'MS'/'LIVE' RIPPED THEM OFF.

HEY 'KAZ', IN CASE YOU HAVEN'T HEARD, THE '360' CAME OUT LAST NOVEMBER..........SO YOU'VE BEEN "FOLLOWING" 'MS', DUMBASS.

 

[Spidey-Bat]

Sony never changes

 

[PWN3R]

Wow, thats even more lame then the price their asking for a PS3!

 

[ProductionMusic]

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=8080THE '360' CAME OUT LAST NOVEMBER..........SO YOU'VE BEEN "FOLLOWING" 'MS', DUMBASS.

Sony is getting worse & worse. They are really getting desperate now

 

[Mentok]

ahahhahahaha

 

[Addendum]

So...

Sony incorporates the Blu-ray as a central aspect of the PS3.

Microsoft decides to release an HD-DVD player as an optional add-on. Apologies for the repetitveness.

I don't see a copy at all. Seriously. No crossing of fingers, toes or other body parts or snide comments.

Sony exists in another Solar System, especially since the July '06 Issue of Game Informer has Kaz Hirai saying the following when asked the question, "What if Blu-ray doesn't win the format war?"

How can that be?

 

[hippie_hunter]

All these recent stupid statements by Sony are pissing me off. Hell the only reason why I am getting it is because of Metal Gear.

 

[LouFerignoDemon]

Actually, MGS isn't even enough to convince me to buy this box of dog s***

 

[SpiderFan17]

That's odd for Kaz to say that, because if my memory serves me right, Sony did their miserable failure of an E3 Presentation beforehand, and Microsoft didn't copy that.

The spin machine with this company knows no bounds.

Awaiting Zenien showing up and defending Sony's completely ******ed statements in 5... 4... 3....

 

[THE LIZARD#1]

Well if you really look at it and over analyze it like I do I can sort of see where he is coming from...Prepare to get the gattlen gun out

If you really think about it Sony was the first console to go online it was sort of their idea with the PC being able to play games I believe like Counter Strike and how online oriented it was they made an online system. If that makes sense, basically Sony came up with online and then Microsoft came out with Xbox live which was a better online system than Sony's but think about it thats because Microsoft came out a year later than Sony's online giving them more resources.

Personally I don't care about these little remarks because somewhat there is truth behind them. Just like Microsoft coming out with a camera for the Xbox 360 can you say Eye-Toy wannabe?

 

[imdaly]

If you really think about it Sony was the first console to go online...

That's if you don't count the Dreamcast, "Sega Channel", and "Xband".

 

[ProductionMusic]

That's if you don't count the Dreamcast, "Sega Channel", and "Xband".

 

[THE LIZARD#1]

That's if you don't count the Dreamcast, "Sega Channel", and "Xband".

And the winner is imdaly who was the fastest to get out his gattlen gun and shoot down my plane of error lol. Man this sucks, i'm never going to get anything right And I call myself a gamer.

P.S.

Sony just gave a little nugget about how much their games will cost for the PS3 he said its not going to be 100 dollars but don't be mad at him if its not in the 59.99 range although he said they want to make the cost as low as possible for the consumer.............................*Wind*

 

[THWIP*]

That's if you don't count the Dreamcast, "Sega Channel", and "Xband".

OR THE FACT THAT PC GAMING WENT ONLINE BEFORE ALL OF THEM.........AND WE ALL KNOW WHO THE KING OF THE PC IS.

 

[ProductionMusic]

he said they want to make the cost as low as possible for the consumer.............................*Wind*

Sure they do

 

[imdaly]

And the winner is imdaly who was the fastest to get out his gattlen gun and shoot down my plane of error lol. Man this sucks, i'm never going to get anything right And I call myself a gamer.

Woo-Hoo! I win!

But, lol, don't go beatin' yourself up now.

P.S.

Sony just gave a little nugget about how much their games will cost for the PS3 he said its not going to be 100 dollars but don't be mad at him if its not in the 59.99 range although he said they want to make the cost as low as possible for the consumer.............................*Wind*

HAHA! Where was this? You got a link? I think you just found the next in a ever-rapid string of crazy "assurances" that Sony's been spitting out lately!

"Don't worry, the games won't cost $100 each. But just don't be upset if they're higher than the normal $50-$60 range. But, hey.....at least they're not $100 each!"

mwahaha. PLEEEEASE tell me you have a link to this!

 

[THWIP*]

Sony just gave a little nugget about how much their games will cost for the PS3 he said its not going to be 100 dollars but don't be mad at him if its not in the 59.99 range although he said they want to make the cost as low as possible for the consumer.............................*Wind*

SORRY, 'SONY'......YOUR JEDI MINDTRICKS WON'T WORK ON ME.

 

[Spidey-Bat]

Personally I don't care about these little remarks because somewhat there is truth behind them. Just like Microsoft coming out with a camera for the Xbox 360 can you say Eye-Toy wannabe?

Sony never did much with the EyeToy except make stupid games no one wanted.

 

[Aiden]

Sony never did much with the EyeToy except make stupid games no one wanted.

And that face wrap thing on Tony Hawks was a pile of ****

 

[Horrorfan]

And the winner is imdaly who was the fastest to get out his gattlen gun and shoot down my plane of error lol. Man this sucks, i'm never going to get anything right And I call myself a gamer.

You could get yourself a 360 instead. that would be doing something right

 

[lars573]

Sony, not living in the real world since 1999.

 

[Horrorfan]

They live right next to Vince McMahon in non-reality land.


But get this, a uk mag called playstation world (psw) did a huge article slamming the ps3 and the lies sony have told. you KNOW you're in trouble when a magazine dedicated to your format slams you hard (and it really was quite brutal). But they had an interview with the head of sony europe, who unbelievably (yet sadly probably rightly) said that ''people would but it at launch, no matter if it had any games or not''.

 

[Aiden]

*runs down to the Spar to get PSW*

 

[Horrorfan]

Its the one with smackdown on the cover. It really is brutal, and worth reading for the sheer entertainment of seeing a ps mag rip on ps3 and sony.

 

[lars573]

They live right next to Vince McMahon in non-reality land.

You mean how he tries the same stuff with different guys and wonders why it doesn't work?

But get this, a uk mag called playstation world (psw) did a huge article slamming the ps3 and the lies sony have told. you KNOW you're in trouble when a magazine dedicated to your format slams you hard (and it really was quite brutal). But they had an interview with the head of sony europe, who unbelievably (yet sadly probably rightly) said that ''people would but it at launch, no matter if it had any games or not''.

Wish I cold see that. The north american PS mags are too far up Sony rectum to do something like that.