In YOUNG ALLIES, Arana definitely mentions not having powers. She even nearly kills herself messing up a jump and probably would have slipped to her death (like Dusk in SLINGERS) if Nomad hadn't been there to help her up. Over there at least she's just slumming it with her grappling hook and SHIELD/Initiative training.
Frankly, I think this is a senseless move. Arana was a spin-off of the JMS Totem story of ASM, originally written by a writer who was JMS' devotee. This was back when he was writing ASM as well as SUPREME POWER (and was about to land THOR) and had a lot of weight at Marvel. Arana's origin was ponderous, but removed from it, she had some charm. Her costume wasn't the greatest, but one could argue it wasn't unlike what a teenager in 2006 might choose to wear for herself, and was distinct. Especially the goggles, and the tattoo on her arm. But now?
Now Arana is using a name that isn't hers, and a costume that isn't hers, and honoring a legacy that isn't hers (as the various "Spider-Women" have nothing to do with the Spider Totem rubbish, or at least didn't; I've heard mixed reviews of GRIM HUNT). Frankly, this not only sounds as bad as Noh-Varr, a quirky Grant Morrison character who could have been a worthy new foil for the Fantastic Four becoming the incredibly bland Protector under Bendis' watch. They've removed almost everything that made Arana unique (besides being a Latina, and that's sad that the fact that someone is Hispanic is apparently enough of a difference to count as major to an industry that is still run, mostly, by middle aged white men who when someone says, "are you hip to the times", they reply, "No, I don't have HIP, I'm on GHI insurance"). They're trying to shove Arana into headlining a franchise that has failed every single time they have launched it.
SPIDER-WOMAN failed. It failed to last long in the 70's and 80's. Carpenter had a stab at it in the 90's, but c'mon, even SLEEPWALKER got about three years in the 90's. Not even Brian Bendis can make SPIDER-MAN sell. SPIDER-GIRL has hovered around the cancellation range for 12 years, and the only reason it has lasted this long is because the digests sold and there's some obscure contract bit with Tom DeFalco in which Marvel HAS to assign him work (which is perhaps similar to what Chris Claremont has with them). How many times does the same franchise have to fail before Marvel tries something new?
I mean, AGENTS OF ATLAS was new. Marvel gave that a very good try over the last two years, but are seeing the writing on the wall. Sad, but they're moving on. They're not just renaming the team ATLAS AVENGERS and shoving them into a franchise where they don't fit, and renaming Ken Hale Beast or calling M-11 "Human Iron Man" or whatever.
I don't think it is a good or wise or innovative idea to take a new character and shove her into a lot of old things, and remove her individuality. It's a mistake DC makes way too often and it makes a lot of their characters interchangeable. You need a Bachelor's Degree in DC Nerdologica to tell the difference between some of the various Robin's or Green Arrow's or Aqualad's or Supergirl's or Atom's or whatever. This move with Arana will fail, and then Tom B. will give some interview in which he acts truly surprised, showing how out of touch he is with his own medium. Any fan in any shop would predict this ain't going to fly.
I hate, absolutely loathe, new ideas or new characters being shoved into some old franchise for no purpose than a company being too spineless and cowardly to try anything new for any length of time. Arana, as she was, at least stood out from the crowd. Now you literally can't tell the difference between her and at least 2-3 other heroines. That leads to apathy. That leads to "why do I care?" rejections and mysteriously underwhelming sales for a debut issue.
I am getting so bloody tired of a medium in which the next new idea is just a recycled old idea from ten, twenty, forty, a hundred damned years ago.
I can see why no one in the big two makes new characters. Even when they try, they are simply chopped up and made into old characters anyway. What's the point of innovation? What is the reward for imagination? It is partly the fans' and retailers fault for not supporting new characters, but they don't do so because DC and Marvel have trained their audience to not bother with "unimportant" books and that any new title or character will be abandoned if it doesn't sell 700,000 copies out of the gate as if it was still 199-****ing 4. So they know not to try. Why bother reading AGENTS OF ATLAS #1 or YOUNG ALLIES #1? Marvel will can it immediately. Does no editorial board see the consequences of their actions, or understand the philosophy of reaping what they have sown? For a company whose major preached motto is, "with great power comes great responsibility", Marvel seems to show no responsibility for accepting some of the problems they have made for themselves regarding new blood. It's always someone else's fault.