Spielberg Blasts "Irresponsible" TV Industry

SoulManX

The Inspector!
Joined
Oct 20, 2004
Messages
11,028
Reaction score
1
Points
58
Steven Spielberg has blasted today's television industry for exposing children to gruesome shows. The Saving Private Ryan director spoke out at the International Emmy's directors meeting in New York on Monday, warning producers to act more responsibly. He singled out graphic trailers which showed "blood and people being dissected" such as for forensic drama CSI: Crime Scene Investigation. Spielberg said, "I'm a parent who is very concerned. Today we need to be as responsible as we can possibly be, not just thinking of our own children but our friends' and neighbors' children. We certainly need to be responsible and carefu
 
Dr. Fate said:
Ah the joy of being Spielberg...

Im a huge fan of this man...he is the reason I got into the entertainment biz...but what he did to E.T. I will neva forgive.:cmad:
 
I read the article with some of his quotes, blasts seems to be too strong a word. He's merely voicing his concerns in a civil manner which seems to be justified. In Heros it is a bit gratutious at times especially isnce it's about superheros which little kids are bound to watch so he makes a valid point.
 
Yeah, that cheerleader getting her head sliced was gruesome for me to watch.
 
BlackHardKnight said:
Im a huge fan of this man...he is the reason I got into the entertainment biz...but what he did to E.T. I will neva forgive.:cmad:

What exactly do you DO in 'the biz'?

Director: "Uh, Hard Knight...Could you get me another one, only this time use arificial sweetener!"

BHK: "Sure, sure...no problem!"
 
Poetic Chaos said:
Yeah, that cheerleader getting her head sliced was gruesome for me to watch.
yes, but the show was pretty responsible about that. heroes isnt on till 9pm, when most kids are going to bed, plus it wasnt showing those gruesome moments in TV commercials that air during times of the day where kids may see it.

spielberg isnt saying 'dont have gore on TV'...he's just saying to be responsible with where and when its used.
 
I'm not really concerned when my neice and nephews see fantasy violence on shows and movies. Spielberg has a right to his opinion and I can see where he's coming from but i'm really more concerned about the sexual stuff on T.V. Disagree if you like but thats where I stand.
 
I SEE SPIDEY said:
I'm not really concerned when my neice and nephews see fantasy violence on shows and movies.

He's not talking about "fantasy" violence since he used CSI as an example. There's nothing "fantasy" about that show. Also, he didn't say NOT to use violence. Just to be careful where and when you use it.

I think he makes a valid point.
 
Catman said:
He's not talking about "fantasy" violence since he used CSI as an example. There's nothing "fantasy" about that show. Also, he didn't say NOT to use violence. Just to be careful where and when you use it.

I think he makes a valid point.
Woah there tiger! You seem a bit hostel, I didn't blast him and I wasn't even harsh so what is your deal? I didn't say that he said not to use violence, show me where I said he said that because I will gladly clear up any misunderstanding by editing my post or posting a new one.

And he did mention Hero's as if it was the same as CSI and on that I will always disagree, that being said I would perfer Hero's have less violence for cratetive reasons.
 
I wasn't hostel. Sorry if you thought I was.
 
I SEE SPIDEY said:
i'm really more concerned about the sexual stuff on T.V.

I have to agree with you on this. I'm no prude,it surprises me sometimes how much nookie is going on and how graphic and intense it gets. That goes for soap operas too.
 
Poetic Chaos said:
Yeah, that cheerleader getting her head sliced was gruesome for me to watch.
they didnt show anything:huh:

if anything i think its censored too much
 
Prognosticator said:
What exactly do you DO in 'the biz'?

Director: "Uh, Hard Knight...Could you get me another one, only this time use arificial sweetener!"

BHK: "Sure, sure...no problem!"

Ha Ha funny:o
 
Yeah, should really be careful when and where you play certain commercials. Becuase some episode of certain shows show certain content that is just- wow.

For instance, personally, I would have put a parental discretion in front of the chopped up brains episode of 'Heroes' and the episode of 'Heroes' that showed a rape scene. Not ban or get rid of those scenes, just put a parental discretion advisory for christ's sake! I guess many parents had thought that show would be safe to watch with their kids and were surprised by those two segments!

So yeah, definitely be ALOT more responsible. Doesn't mean a 'ban' - just act responsibly by putting certain advisories.
 
hmmm...his comments were pretty fair, but the media is trying to stir things up "berg is a hypocrite etc".....

from spielbergfilms.com:


November 21, 2006
Spielberg speaks out against violence in TV promos

More information has been published across the media on the interview that Steven Spielberg participated in at yesterday's International Emmys luncheon in New York City. Unfortunately, some of this information has been reported and/or taken out-of-context, sending some online sources, particularly media-minded bloggers, to take Spielberg to task for misconstrued statements.

The big news that was making the rounds today was Spielberg's discussion with the sundry industry executives at the Emmy luncheon about portrayals of violence on television. Unfortunately, even this article from The Hollywood Reporter (which seems to have kicked off the trickle down reporting) seems to have signals crossed, first stating that Spielberg was decrying violence in teen and adult programming like the "CSI" dramas and "Heroes."

The Reporter points out, as do other sources, that controversy erupted when Spielberg's R-rated films "Schindler's List" and "Saving Private Ryan" screened un-edited on network television. Famously, "Saving Private Ryan" even ran afoul of Federal Communications Commission debate when it last aired. Talk of levying fines on affiliate ABC stations caused a media firestorm, until it was ruled that the film, while obviously extremely violent, did not violate decency standards as defined by the FCC.

None of this is the point from yesterday's interview, however, as Spielberg wasn't pounding a pulpit on the violence in adult programming per se, but as the Reporter mentions in passing itself, the "on-air promotions" for the aforementioned shows and their like.

Unfortunately, the same interview saw Spielberg mention that a scene in "Heroes," a show that he openly proclaimed as his favorite program of the new season, depicted a character being ripped in two. The filmmaker mentioned that the scene was too graphic for his younger children, and so as a conscientious parent, he sent them out of the room. A direct line between this and Spielberg's discussion about violence in television spots that air throughout the day has been drawn and because of this, some media sources are crying foul that Spielberg is being contradictory considering some of his past work.

Obviously Spielberg made a choice within his parental rights that his younger children would be able to handle a TV-14 program airing during what was once known as family viewing hours ("Heroes" airs before safe harbor kicks in at 10 p.m.) He was not making a judgment against television executives or producers about mature programming that is too violent, rather, that violence-filled promotions and commercial spots have free run of networks throughout the day. It's an important distinction, and Spielberg isn't the only parent with a serious concern for television and film marketing inappropriate for younger audiences airing at inappropriate hours on network television.

"Today we are needing to be as responsible as we can possibly be, not just thinking of our own children but our friends' and neighbors' children," Spielberg said during the interview.

Spielberg also talked about the power of television as a communication medium.

"We certainly need to be responsible and careful about what we put into that box, because what comes out the other end truly has changed the world and will continue to change the world, for better or worse," he said. "I'm happy to think it is changing the world for the better."

 
Or how about parents be responsible with their viewing habits? As much as I like Law and Order and at times Law and Order: SVU, it's not something intended for families to watch all together. If the parent/s can't realize that but instead of blaming networks and TV show producers, then the parents are averting the blame from themselves.

It's not that damn hard to use a TV guide. Cable and satellite companies have guides included with their services which give descriptions of the show's content.
 
Wow, I mentioned Heroes without knowing that Spielburg brought up Heroes. But, I mean- that's a show that any parent would figure to be safe for children to watch. And Heroes (I love the show), in my opinion, should put parental advisory before some episodes. Because one episode showed brains sliced open that even WOWED us when it was on air because of how far they took it- and that rape scene?! That was just down-right brutal! So, in front of episodes with that content- I agree, have advisories of some type.

And Addendum, I don't care about shows like SVU. But 'Heroes'? Come on!!! I don't see that many PG-13 films take it as far as some of the episodes did! Showing sliced brain matter? Showing a brutal rape that has got to be the hardest PG-13 rape scene I have ever personally seen- and I see ALOT of films. There has to be some form of advisory- not talking about a ban- just an advisory.

I'm not a parent, but looking back on Heroes- heck yeah they should have some advisories due to some of the content that it shows.

I know that Smallville, an often kid friendly show, has on occassion used parental advisories. So, why should 'Heroes' be any different? When the content that 'Heroes' has is worse than any advisory episode of Smallville!
 
Tempest19 said:
Wow, I mentioned Heroes without knowing that Spielburg brought up Heroes. But, I mean- that's a show that any parent would figure to be safe for children to watch. And Heroes (I love the show), in my opinion, should put parental advisory before some episodes. Because one episode showed brains sliced open that even WOWED us when it was on air because of how far they took it- and that rape scene?! That was just down-right brutal! So, in front of episodes with that content- I agree, have advisories of some type.
tvratings.jpg

:huh:

What do you call those?
 
There's also called PARENTAL ADVISORY- perhaps you have seen these from time to time?

Some episodes are child safe, while others aren't. It's that simple. As I mentioned before- SMALLVILLE(!!!!) has used some parental advisories in the past for certain episodes- why should 'Heroes' be any different?!

You know those advisory screens were created for a reason.

One episode is safe and then the next you either of Hannibal Lector like scenes of brains being half cut open or a brutal rape scene.
 
And TV shows do use them. It's not the producer's fault that some parents are too lazy to read the screen.
 
Taken from your response, I don't think you know the advisories that I am talking about. There is a black screen with white text reading 'parental discretion advised'. Those small squares with ratings- that can change from week to week. One week it's a family friendly PG-13 and the next it's a hard 13 bordering on an R<- and that's when you use the extra advisory. Or else you'll have parents watch one episode, see it as family safe and then next week there's a brutal rape scene or maybe a sliced brain that looks like something out of the film 'Hannibal'. I mean- that brain scene, I still don't know how they got that on screen because that was definitely boarding on an MA, if not an MA in my opinion. Because the picture of the victim and how he was killed was exactly the same content as that of an R rated film (the brain matter).

I'm not saying, don't do it- but use some freakin' responsibility! Or maybe, the WB and now CW and Fox the only responsible networks on air now a' days. Because Smallville used it- why doesn't Heroes? You keep on skipping past that question: Why is 'Heroes' any different than 'Smallville'? If you notice- almost every episode, if not every episode of Prison Break uses the black screen and white text advisory.

Why should 'Heroes' be treated any differently?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,163
Messages
21,908,355
Members
45,703
Latest member
BMD
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"