Here is my spoiler filled review of...
Spider-man: Homecoming.
Off the top, I didn't love it and I also didn't hate it.
Let's start with the things I did like.
Tom Holland. A great choice of actor for Peter Parker/Spider-man.
His acting ability can stand toe to toe with any other actor who wore the red and blue tights. He has good comedic timing and can go deep to get the emotional pathos of a dramatic scene and make it seem effortless.
Michael Keaton. Always great to me and actually the person I liked the most in this film acting wise. Absolutely the right choice for this roll although I had my reservations and I had another actor in mind. Keaton wiped that idea away immediately once I saw him in the roll.
The Costume.....Although I still have some issues with the design,seeing it in action on the big screen had some of those issues dissipate because of all of the CGI help it got. It really did for the most part evoke the classic Romita Sr. look that I always wanted to see. Not perfect but pretty darn close.
Donald Golver was cool.
It was cool to see Tyne Daly.
Bokeem Woodbine was good but undeserved IMHO.
The Director also shot the movie well for the most part.
Now for the things I didn't dig.
The story.
This story was predictable and weak like I thought it would be.
First off...Call me old fashion but once you take away the most important mantra (which was later attributed to being the words of Uncle Ben) and being the motivating factor for the character,the most iconic in all of comicdom "WITH GREAT POWER COMES GREAT RESPONSIBILITY." That's one of the things that would make that version of the character ceases to be Spider-Man TO ME. There where some perfect times in this when MARVEL could have and SHOULD have used it but didn't. It to me this is the equivalent of rebooting the Green Lantern franchise and never hearing the GL oath. And we know what would happen if he doesn't say the oath.
Secondly what is Peter's/Spidey's motivations? I was discussing this with my wife and son's and a few friends via email and came to the conclusion that this version of Spider-man because the fact that MARVEL took away his mantra that was seared on his heart because of the tragic death of his beloved Uncle Ben and also feeling some guilt because he feels it was partially his fault. Peter would NEVER use his powers for selfish reasons again was all taken away. Why? Because now Pete doesn't have that motivation and now it's all about joining The Avengers AND trying to please the one Avenger who actually causes most of the problems in the MCU. He doesn't put on the suit just because it was the right thing to do anymore. He became selfish Peter AGAIN or he in this version always was and will be selfish like the Ferris Bueller character and spirit they so poorly are ripping off.. Sadly this Peter/Spidey can't think or do for himself either like he did from the comics AND cartoons. This version stripped away most of the reasons why we like the PERSON of Peter Parker in the first place.
WHY do we need Peter to have an annoying side kick that threatens to tell his secret more than once (AND ALMOST DID ONCE TO THE WHOLE SCHOOL) who is also selfish. If he would have fell in that elevator I would have been alright with it.
Back to the Spider-Man suit. What it can do is just too FREAKIN MUCH!!! It's like MARVEL Just vomited ever aspect of every video game of Spider-man
into that suit. WTH were they thinking? It was too much even when he had the training wheel protocols turned ON. Sigh.........
The rest of the cast.
So sickeningly predictable and weak.
Why did MARVEL feel the need to lie about Zendaya being 'MJ'?
Even they are backing off of it because it was some week BS.
Read for yourself.
Spider-Man: Homecoming producers Kevin Feige and Amy Pascal have dismissed suggestions that Zendayas character in the film is actually Mary Jane Watson. Zendayas quick-witted character in the hit reboot, Michelle, is referred to towards the end as MJ, leading fans to speculate that she could turn out to be the favorite However, Marvel boss Feige has insisted Michelle is her own character. He told IGN: We never even looked at it as a big reveal necessarily, but more of just a fun homage to his past adventures and his past love. Shes not Mary Jane Watson. She never was Mary Jane Watson. She was always this new high school character, Michelle, who we know theres an M in Michelle and an M in Mary. He added: So were so clever and we thought, Wouldnt it be neat if her initials were MJ? And then I think it leaked that she would be playing MJ and then it became a whole headache for Zendaya to have to navigate. It was never a big, Oh my God, its a big reveal! There are big reveals in the movie. Thats not one of them.' Sounds like a truck backing up. Beep! Beep! Beep! Beep! Beep! Beep!............
The rest of the cast was just there for weak jokes and color.
The African student that does the same joke over and over about Flash being wrong...is it Funny because it's funny or are people laughing at the accent?
Hannibal Buress ....Disinterested black man falling asleep at his Job. Tony Revolori "Flash Thompson" DID NOT work for me period. And not because of his race.
Flash needs to be a physical presence of a bully because that is another one of the important hurdles for Peter to understanding
the full picture of "With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility." then later learns to beat Flash with his mind and not his fist at his first impulse. This so called Flash Thompson doesn't look like Flash in any way shape or form or even pose any perceived threat to Peter so what was the point?
In Man of Steel they showed it better in the fact that young Clark wanted to fight back the physically imposing
bully yet knew better not to because he was obviously taught (to steal the phrase here) "With Great Power Come Great Responsibility." Had to go there.
Flash not really a bully just a unfunny rich kid jerk. He actually would have been a better Harry Osborn then they later become best friends.
Hold on...That took a lot out of me to say that. ^ Not that I really would even wanted that either.
HATED the ham handed and immediately predictable tribute to 'Ferris bueller's day off.'
Having Iron-Man and the dumb Captain America vids in this movie rubbed me wrong on many levels.
Why would Cap doe these? He hated doing being a poster boy in the First Avenger? They were also uncomfortably not funny.
Why are they showing them to these kids? The Hannibal Buress character even made the point that he (Cap) is now a enemy of the State.
Tony Stark/Iron-Man and Peter just got back from a major fight against their "friends" and Tony's very best friend broke his back....
Why is Tony driving Peter back home and joking around about sexy Aunt May? TONY! YOUR BEST FRIEND GOT HIS BACK BROKE BECAUSE OF YOU!!!! The could have had the whole scene without Tony and it could have still played well with just Happy Hogan....OR...Have Tony in the Hospital with Rhodey talking though those glasses he was wearing. Have Tony show for once that he is not a complete insensitive jerk. These movies are making me like Iron-Man less and less each time. Speaking of Tony's insensitivity that goes to why I kinda understood the Vulture's motivation to hate Tony and his desire for family above all and ANYONE who threatens his family was dead meat. People like Tony can push hard working good intending persons only so far till they push back.
To me I just didn't over all like the message they were saying in this film if there really was any one main message. It got lost on me.
There is more I can go into but it's not worth the typing time.
I would buy the blu ray but I will be doing some serious fast forwarding.
If I had to give this a 1 to 10 number It would be a solid 5 for me.
But hey....what do I know?