TheVileOne
Eternal
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2002
- Messages
- 70,869
- Reaction score
- 15,088
- Points
- 103
KaptainKrypton said:Warner gets all the power in a deal like this. Not the unknown commodity. This is why they have the option to use him again if they want.
How do you know this for sure? Did you read his contract?
The sets were larger, more elaborate in design, and way more varied in terms of design. The FX were also more labored in their task. It's a lot easier to shoot spaceships in flight and stuff like that as opposed to rendering a complete 3D character in flight. My basic point was that depending on how the sequel is written, whether or not the budget will be higher. A lot of the flight shots in SR were completely CG. If the movie were done 10 or even five years ago, then it would've been more green-screen, which is cheaper. WB just let him do what he wanted FX-wise for this one.
I bet you think Batman Begins is going to cost less as well.
Batman Begins also did NOT use a ton of CG. It had a lot of live sets and tons of location shooting. And it still cost over $150 million.
Singer knows a return for the sequel means he probably won't clear as much out of the gate for a paycheck as he did for SR (due to the underwhelming box office). Singer has proven in the past that he can make a superhero movie hit and still be fiscally responsible and do it in a crunched time frame (X1 and X2). This time out WB basically gave him carte blanche to do whatever he wanted to (this included using a new, untested camera for the first time and choosing an unknown in the lead role). They'll tighten the reins a bit on him for the next one, I think, but he'll still be able to make a solid film (in terms of production quality).
Assuming that Singer even directs the next one at all. If there is a next one
.
