©KAW;18228900 said:
Sadly, Stan Lee could have been a powerful voice for making comic book films better, as a yes man puppet, you can't really take anything he says seriously.
That's what you said about Mark Miller when I posted up his opinion on Spider-man1, when he said that "although it's very easy to pick at the movie, MaGuire was Ditko's Parker in the flesh".
and that wasn't even a 100% positve assessment, sounded to me like a level headed opinion.
If someone indiscriminately says that everyone is a 'puppet' when they work for Marvel and do not share their own opinon, well...you tell me what that says about that person(rhetorical question, lol).
Stan was also very critical of the outfit they gave Daredevil in the Incredible Hulk tv movie , 'The Trial of TIH'. Which was also his first cameo in a live action Marvel production(he was a jury member).
edit: and I am not surprised Stan has been positive about the Marvel movies in general, if indeed he has, the guy spent decades trying to get them onscreen and ended up with crappy humdingers, with the exception of the 70s/80s Hulk show. and, the Dolph Punisher movie, i like that one, but i bet Stan slagged it off.
But, this does not mean that anyone who works for Marvel and expresses a mixed/positive opinion on a movie is a 'yes man'.
Gene Colan slagged off the 2003 DD movie, and I'm sure there have been other less than positive opinions on adaptations by Marvel writer/artists I can't recall right now.
edit: I would say Stan is probably the exception in giving mostly positive opinions, because he is just so happy about finally getting decent versions onscreen compared to all the crap in the past.