Binker
Superhero
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2005
- Messages
- 7,118
- Reaction score
- 185
- Points
- 73
Okay, thanks.
Honestly, it looks the same. Everyone was saying it looked different, like Abrams meets Ent-D or something.
Okay, thanks.
Honestly, it looks the same. Everyone was saying it looked different, like Abrams meets Ent-D or something.
Easily the best of the reboot films for me. Yes, perhaps not as well directed and slick as Abrams' entries, but much more faithful to the spirit of Star Trek and way better written than those Orci and Kurtzman messes. I hope Pegg is involved in the writing of the next one. I'd love to see what he could do with a full pre-production period than a last minute rescue to salvage a scriptless movie.
How long is the film?
Writers Simon Pegg and Doug Jung were passed over for Star Trek 4.
http://trekcore.com/blog/2016/07/official-star-trek-4-is-happening/
Okay, thanks.
Honestly, it looks the same. Everyone was saying it looked different, like Abrams meets Ent-D or something.
Word of advice: Don't quote posts with bootleg material in them. It's a sure fire way to get an infraction.
As for the Ent-A, the only difference I can notice is the saucer's sides are no longer vertical like a pancake's but instead are angled. Gives it a sharper look.
I'm really excited to see Spock and Bones on their side quest.
Definitely one of the highlights of the movie. The have a lot of fun moments together, and my audience was loving it.I'm really excited to see Spock and Bones on their side quest.
It did nothing for me. There was no premise. The movie has to be the most boring movie I've seen in the past 5 years.
Just dreadful.
Here it is.
Notice the nacelles?
Also, the nacelles are spaced further apart and the design seems to be better balanced.
A volcano wouldnt have made a very good film villain for a star trek film. It would have been fine for a 40 minute episode, but a two hour star trek film...