State your unpopular film related opinion - Part 10

Status
Not open for further replies.
There's also Jack and Jill, Battleship, Wolverine Origins, Green Hornet, Year One (Jack Black lol), and the Total Recall remake. There's way worse than IM2 and QoS.
i didn't see jack and jill, battleship, or year one. i don't doubt they were worse than IM2 or QoS...i just knew they probably would be and avoided them at all costs. the only reason i saw love guru and zohan was because they featured jessica alba and emmanuelle chriqui respectively.

i will concede wolverine origins is indeed even worse than IM2/QoS. it was a complete disaster. whoever wrote that godawful script really should stop.

green hornet was actually entertaining the first time through. the total recall remake, while falling terrible short of the arnold classic was just a mediocre film, not a terrible one, imo.
 
Unpopular Opinion: Skyfall was far from one of the best Bond movies, and ultimately suffered from having a really mediocre script.
Just out of curiosity, what are your favorite Bond films?
 
Moonrise Kingdom is my least favorite Wes Anderson film.
 
Dr. No, followed by Casino Royale.

And Diamonds Are Forever is my least favorite Bond movie. :o
Good ones.

Let's try a few Bond film related unpopular opinions:

I don't really care for GE, in fact even though I think Brosnan was a decent Bond and that, given better material, he could have done something more interesting with the part (same could be said for Dalton I guess), I don't really like any of his Bond films.
Besides the soundtrack, the ski chase and Diana Rigg, and besides its late in life gain in popularity I'm still not too crazy about OHMSS. Probably due to the fact that I think Lazenby was a really bad Bond.
FYEO is terrible. I don't understand how some people consider it a good Bond film and one of the best Moore efforts? The only two good Moore Bond films are LALD and especially TSWLM.
 
Good ones.

Let's try a few Bond film related unpopular opinions:

I don't really care for GE, in fact even though I think Brosnan was a decent Bond and that, given better material, he could have done something more interesting with the part (same could be said for Dalton I guess), I don't really like any of his Bond films.
Besides the soundtrack, the ski chase and Diana Rigg, and besides its late in life gain in popularity I'm still not too crazy about OHMSS. Probably due to the fact that I think Lazenby was a really bad Bond.
FYEO is terrible. I don't understand how some people consider it a good Bond film and one of the best Moore efforts? The only two good Moore Bond films are LALD and especially TSWLM.

:waa:
 
Speaking of Bond, here's an unusual one:

Daniel Craig, brilliant 007 though he is, has a really weird run.

Seriously, next time you're watching Skyfall keep an eye out for it. Every time he bursts into a sprint it's like, "waaaaadddafuq?"
I don't know if it's because he's so built or what, but there it is...
 
I didn't know he was short, he seems huge on screen. But, yeah, he looks like someone who's only ever had running described to him. :hehe:
 
It could be that his balls still hurt from Casino Royale.
 
It could be that his balls still hurt from Casino Royale.

lmao


-I dont really want Hamill, Ford, or Fischer to show up in Episode VII
-Going off that I dont really Han Solo or Leia to be in Episode VII. At least not more than cameos
 
Last edited:
This is an unpopular opinion. I did not like Skyfall. I loved CR and QOS had some good moments, but I just didn't like Skyfall. I have only seen it once, and I came into the theater without having seen many trailers or read anything about the movie, so my expectations to what I was about to see were way off. However, I'm sure that I'll like it more when I see it the second time.
 
-I dont really want Hamill, Ford, or Fischer to show up in Episode VII
-Going off that I dont really Han Solo or Leia to be in Episode VII. At least not more than cameos

I believe that Luke, Leia, and Han should be recast for the sequels, putting EpVII only a few years after Jedi. It worked okay for Star Trek.
 
I believe that Luke, Leia, and Han should be recast for the sequels, putting EpVII only a few years after Jedi. It worked okay for Star Trek.

It worked for Star Trek because they rebooted and restarted the franchise from the beginning. Recasting Ep7 as a continuation of the story is a no-go for me.
 
It worked for Star Trek because they rebooted and restarted the franchise from the beginning. Recasting Ep7 as a continuation of the story is a no-go for me.
I agree. If you can get all the main actors back, you're kind of obligated to use them.
 
I think all of this is kind of a moot point as its all but been confirmed that the original characters will appear as much older versions of themselves.
 
Rocky V isn't as terrible as people make it out to be.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"